Clinical Flashcards
What are the 4 D’s of diagnosis?
Deviance
Danger
Distress
Dysfunction
Deviance
Behaviours, cognitions, feelings and desires which are extreme, unusual or bizarre and which differ from social and statistical norms.
They may get negative attention from others and social exclusion and for this reason norm-breaking is seen as a useful indicator.
Dysfunction
The inability to conduct everyday activities and their usual roles and responsibilities.
This is measured on the WHODAS II (world health organisation disability assessment schedule) which is a questionnaire that looks at factors such as a persons understanding of what’s going on around them, communication and deterioration in self-care.
Distress
- When symptoms cause emotional pain or anxiety this is a sign that a diagnosis may be beneficial to the person. They may be manifested into physical symptom eg aches and pains, palpitations or feeling tired all the time.
- Measured using the Kessler Psychological distress scale (K10) which is a 10 item self report questionnaire on experiences in the last 4 weeks.
Danger
Careless, hostile or hazardous behaviour which jeopardises the safety of the individual and/or others may be considered grounds for diagnosis.
In the UK if they are considered a danger to themselves or others they can be detained. This requires the agreement of 3 professionals.
Give 2 strengths of the 4 Ds in diagnosing mental health disorders.
- Helps avoid erroneous diagnosis- If only one is used then you could diagnose people with something they don’t have and might miss other things. This means that the system is valid and not over nor under inclusive.
- Application- Used in conjunction with classification manuals such as the DSM-5 or ICD-10. As different disorders display a different combination of D’s so all of them are useful.
Give 2 weaknesses of the 4 D model
- Lack of objectivity- They aim to be objective but as they are based off of feelings eg distress. This makes it unlikely. The lack of objectivity effects reliability. Also in terms of deviance its in comparison to social norms and so effects reliability as they rely on the subjective view of the clinician.
- Labelling- We end up with labels for people with mental health issues. ‘Danger’ as a criterion leads people to equate mental health with danger. Fazel says most people with schizophrenia are not actually more dangerous than people without.
What is the DSM?
Describes symptoms and features and risk factors of over 300 mental and behavioural disorders. Provides revenue for the American Psychiatric Association.
Describe the 3 sections of the DSM-5
- Section 1: Guidance about using the new system
- Section 2: Details about the disorders and is categorised according to our current understanding of underlying causes and similarities between symptoms.
- Section 3: Suggestions for new disorders which require further investigation.
How do clinicians gather information on an individual?
- Observation
- Unstructured (clinical) interviews
- Structured interviews.
2 ways reliability is assessed
- Test-retest reliability
- Inter-rater reliability
4 ways validity is assessed
- Descriptive validity
- Aetiological validity
- Concurrent validity
- Predictive validity
Descriptive validity
When two people with the same diagnosis exhibit similar symptoms
Aetiological validity
When two patients share similar causal factors
Concurrent validity
When a clinician uses more than one method or technique to get a diagnosis, both giving the same diagnosis.
Predictive validity
Accurately predict outcomes for an individual from their diagnosis eg prognosis and reaction to treatment.
Give a strength and a weakness of the DSM in terms of reliability
Strength- REGIER: 3 disorders inc PTSD had kappa values ranging from 0.60 to 0.79. 7 more had values of 0.40 and 0.59. PTSD is significant as the criterion has changed.
Weakness- COOPER: DSM-5 task force classified levels as low as 0.2 and 0.4 as ‘acceptable’ suggesting that the DSM-5 may be less reliable than previous models.
Give a strength and a weakness of the DSM in terms of validity
Strength- KIM-COHEN: Demonstrated the concurrent validity of conduct disorder. Through interviewing children and their mothers. They also found risk factors so aetiological validity. Predictive validity as the 5yr olds were more likely to display behavioural difficulties aged 7.
Weakness- Just a label: The DSM lacks validity as a psychiatric diagnosis tells us nothing about what is causing a disorder. A diagnosis is a label and tells us nothing useful.
What is the ICD?
- Includes both physical and mental disorders.
- Created by the WHO.
- Provides common language so that data from many countries can be compared.
- 11 sections in chapter 5 with leftover codes.
How is the ICD used to make a diagnosis?
Selects key words from an interview with a client that relates to their symptoms.
The clinician looks up these symptoms in an alphabetic index. Then uses other symptoms to locate a subcategory.
what does HCPC stand for
Health and Care Professions Council
What improvements were made to the ICD-10
Presentation, communication and interpretation of symptoms is shaped by language and culture. This culture bias means that clients in one culture could get a different diagnosis from clients in another culture, despite presenting similar symptoms.
The ICD-10 was made in many different languages and appropriate cultural forms. The process reveals inconsistencies, ambiguities and overlaps. The ICD-10 is now described as clear, simple and logically organised.
Give 2 strengths of the ICD in terms of reliability
- PONIZOVSKY- The reliability of the ICD-9 and ICD-10. About 3000 patients assessed. They found PPV increased from 68% to 94% for schizophrenia.
- GALEAZZI- Two researchers assessed 100 patients with psychosomatic symptoms and had kappa values from 0.69 to 0.97.
Give 2 strengths of the ICD in terms of validity
- MASON- The diagnosis of schizophrenia using the ICD-10 has good predictive validity. ‘Reasonably good’ at predicting disability in 99 people with schizophrenia 13 years later. Shows that the initial diagnosis was useful and meaningful in terms of its ability to accurately predict future outcomes.
- Application- The development of the ICD-11 they aimed to improve the ‘clinical utility’ of this system. Having spoken to clinicians they will be cautious adding new disorders and will merge difficult disorders.
what is the HCPC
a regulator set up to protect the public.
how does the HCPC achieve their aim
they keep a register of professiona;s who meet their standards for their professional skills, knowledge and behaviour
name the 10 standards
- promote and protect the interests of service users and carers
- communicate appropriately and effectively
- work within the limits of your knowledge and skills
- delegate appropriately
- respect confidentiality
- manage risk
- report concerns about safety
- be open when things go wrong
- be honest and trustworthy
- keep records of your work
give an example of ‘promote and protect the interests of service users and carers’
keep relationships professional, if a client develops feelings for the psychologist, they must decline any advances and potentially arrange for another clinician to take over.
must gain consent from client before providing care, treatment of other services.
give an example of ‘work within the limits of your knowledge and skills’
keep up to date with and follow the law, this guidence and other requirements relevant.
keep within the scope of your practice – if a client requires medical attention, do not attempt to provide this if you lack the qualifications
give an example of ‘delegate appropriately
only delegate to people who have the knowledge, skills and experience required. continue to provide supervision.
what is background question of the clincial practical
how do mainstream political parties in this country view mental health
what is the aim of the research
to investigate the views held by 4 of the main[stream] political parties in the UK towards mental health using their 2015 manifestos
what are the variables of our clincial practical
viewpoints/polices/positions regarding mental health
what is the researhc hypothesis of our clinical paractical
there will be a significant difference in the viewpoints of left-leaning and right-leaning political parties in terms od mental health
what was the sample of our clincial practical
4 political parties manifestos (2015) - conservative, labour, lib dems, green.
what was the procedure of the clinical practical
go through manifestos and use control f to find mentions of mental health within each manifesto. read over quotes and identify themes (6 - improving accessibility, reforming NHS, increasing funding for NHS, special focus groups, employment, ending discrimination/stigma) in which each mention of mental health can be categorised. tally up each mention of mental health for each party in the relevant theme. create pie charts to demonstrate the proportion of how each party mentions mental health. select quotes and analyse the way in which each party discusses the themes identified.
what ethical issues in the clinical practical
none.
its ethical because the info is on the public domain
how are we analysing data in the clincal pracical
pie chart –> qualitative
describe how each political parties talk about those things –> qualitative
what were the quantative results of of clinical practical
The r-wing parties mention mental health less than l-wing. r-wing = 10 mentions. l-wing = 17.3 mentions (mean).
r-wing mention MH in the context of accessibility more than the left wing parties. 30% vs 12.7%.
r-wing mention MH in the context of reforming the NHS less than the l-wing parties. 0% vs 25.3%.
what is a similarity between l-wing and r-wing parties’ manifestos in terms of MH
they both suggest they will increase funding for mental health care for young people and children. similar intentions for future plans for funding MH for children.
c: “increasing funding for mental health… including children and young people”.
l: “will increase the proportion of mental health budget that is spent on children”
ld: “revolutionize children’s mental health services… with the £250 million a year”
what are 3 differences between r-wing and l-wing manifestos in terms of MH
- r-wing focus on economic benefits of improving MH services, l-wing focus of social benefits.
- l-wing parties want to reform certain aspects of NHS, whereas r-wing aren’t looking to change the way its run, just the no. of staff and funding.
- mention MH within employment in different contexts
explain the difference of r-wing focus on economic benefits of improving MH services, l-wing focus of social benefits
c: “ensure proper provision of health and community based places of safety for people suffering mental health crises - saving police time”
g: “Work towards ending stigma against people with mental health problems, including discrimination in employment.”
explain the difference of l-wing parties want to reform certain aspects of NHS, whereas r-wing aren’t looking to change the way its run, just the no. of staff and funding.
c: “new access and waiting time standards” “increasing funding”
no mention of reforming
l: “current system is too fragmented” “we will create a whole person approach: a single service to meet all of a person’s health and care needs.”
explain the difference of mention MH within employment in different contexts
c: “should get the medical help they need so they can return to work” “if they refuse a recommended treatment, we will review whether their benefits should be reduced”
ld: “Support good practice among employers in promoting wellbeing” “Improve links between Jobcentres and Work Programme
providers and the local NHS”
what is the construct validity of our clinical practical
reasonably high
- behaviour categories worked well in terms of sorting the data
- control-f function allowed us to pick up all instances of “mental” (health, issues) but may have missed some related terms. e.g. talk of suicide
what is the ecological validity of our clinical practical
mixed
manifestos are real life documents not produced for the purposes of our research
- nothing artificial about the process
- findings should apply to real world
- however, what they say they will do in the manifesto and what they actually do may not be the same thing so findings may not generalise
what is the population validity of our clinical practical
- target pop = mainstream political parties in the uk in 2015
- sample = con, lab, lib, green
- but UKIP were 3rd highest in terms of vote share.
- we didnt study that manifesto because they were a one issue party and they disappeared post-brexit
- however, there is still a lack of generalisability and this may have left r-wing parties underrepresented
what is the reliability of our clinical practical
- inter-rater reliability was generally high - once we had categories it was easy to tally up as everyone had the same catgoeies
- however, it was low for the behavioural category of accessibility. this is because quite often improvements to accessibility had to be inferred from the statements made by the political parties
- some observers made the inferences, some didnt
what is the objectivity of our clinical practical
- opinion in terms of how you tally up
- opinion in terms of themes
- opinion in terms of quotes
- but from the point that you have your data, there is no opinion in terms of its analysis - e.g. average number of MH mentions in L-wing parties.
whats the conclusion of our clinical practical
In conclusion, our results support the research hypothesis that there will be a significant difference between the views held by left and right leaning parties in terms of mental health, suggesting we should accept it. This leads us to believe there are variations in the way mental health is discussed by different mainstream political parties, specifically between the left and right wing parties. left wing parties have more of an orientation towards social justice.
what were the results of our summative content analysis
we found that right leaning parties mention mental health less than left leaning parties; 10 mentions and 17.3 mentions on avaerage respectively. right wing parties mention mental health more in terms of accessibility (30% of their mentions) whole left wing mention it less (12.7% on average). both right wing and left wing parties discuss increasing funding to benefit mental health services for children. conservatives state “increase funding for mental health services… including for children and young people”, while liberal democrats also say they will “revolutionise children’s mental health services… with £250 million a year”.
What is the aim of Rosenhan (1973)?
To investigate whether sane people could be admitted to psychiatric institution and if once admitted they would be detected. Also to find out what life was like in a psychiatric hospital and raise awareness about conditions.
What was the sample of Rosenhan (1973)?
The participants were the staff and the true patients as it was their behaviour that was recorded.
This stuff in the 12 hospitals representing a range of good and bad, old and new institutions across five states in the USA.
Who were the pseudo patients?
8 pseudo patients, including Rosenhan, were recruited. Three women and five men. None had a history of mental problems. The occupations included paediatrician, psychiatrist, painter and housewife.
What was the first thing Rosenhan had the researchers do?
They each had to phone the admissions office of one of the 12 hospitals to make an appointment because they were “hearing things”. they used the words ‘empty’ ‘thud’ ‘hollow’
in defence of the psychiatrists, hearing thud wasn’t only symptom, they were nervous from lying and insisted on being hospitalised.
Psychiatrist tend to play it safe and go for the most serious diagnosis before ruling it out.
Discharging pseudo patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in remission is evidence that the psychiatrist thought the patients were completely asymptomatic. Schizophrenia in relation is a rare diagnosis.
To what extent did the researchers provide correct information about themselves?
Each patient gave a false name in order to protect themselves.
Those who profession was psychology related also gave a fake job, but everything else they disclosed to the staff, including the significant life and family relationships, was correct.
Once they were in the hospital they acted normally
Were all the researchers admitted to the hospitals? And if so, what diagnosis were they given?
Yes, they were all admitted with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, except one who was admitted with manic depression with psychosis.
Does Rosenhan (1973) research show the DSM to be reliable or not?
reliable because they were almost all given the same diagnosis.
What happened once the researchers were admitted to the hospitals?
Once admitted, they stopped feigning symptoms and behaved normally, answering all questions from staff and patients honestly except about being part of a study.Once settled in, they observed life on the ward, were friendly and cooperative, and recorded their experiences by taking notes. They had to try and convince the staff of their sanity in order to get out.They had daily visitors who indicated that they were behaving normally.
they were all eventually discharged with schizophrenia in remission. shortest stay was 7 days, longest 52, average 19
What was the key finding of Rosenhan (1973)?
All pseudopatients were diagnosed as having a serious mental health disorder on minimal symptoms.
Was the sanity of the researchers ever detected by staff?
No. However, patients did suspect the pseudo patients were saying.One asked whether the researcher was a journalist.In three hospitals where records were taken, about a third of the patients challenged the pseudo patients (35/118)
researchers discharged with schizophrenia in remission
How did the staff treat the researchers?
In a way that was consistent with their diagnosis, an frequently pathologic sized normal behaviour.For example, note taking was referred to as writing behaviour. Pacing from boredom was interpreted as nervousness and waiting outside the none too early was labelled by 1 clinician as Oral Inquisitive Syndrome.
Depersonalization of the patients by staff.
What statistics were found regarding the depersonalization of patients by staff?
When contact was initiated towards the nurses by the pseudo patients, 71% of times were ignored.Eye contact was made 23% of the time, verbal responses 2% of cases.This was worse from the contact was directed towards senior staff members. Of 185 reasonable questions, directed at staff none were answered.
Describe the follow up of Rosenhan’s study.
Some institutions reacted with a challenge as they did not believe their systems would be so easily fooled. Rosenhan agreed with one leading hospital to do another similar study and set up a test.Every staff member who dealt with admissions had to rate all patients in terms of probability that they could be pseudo patients.Over a three month period, 193 patients were admitted and of those, 41 were thought to be fake by at least one staff member, and nineteen of those were classed as fake by two members.In fact, Rosenhan sent no pseudopatients to the hospital.This confirms his initial result that there is unreliability in the diagnostic process.
What conclusions were made by Rosenhan?
He was concerned about the effect of the label made when a diagnosis was attached to a person and the way a person was subsequently treated by the staff in institutions.
He contended that the diagnostic label changed the perception of the person so that all their behaviour was interpreted within the context of the label.He argued this could lead to the self-filling prophecy, as the person is then treated in a way that is consistent with the label and their behaviour in response to this consistent with the label, thus confirming the validity of the label.
what is a strength of rosenhan
population validity
- 12 hospitals spread over a wide geographical area (5 different states)
- variety of type of insitution (research and teaching hospitals to private ones to older shabbier ones)
- findings not limited to one type of hospial or area
- but was only tested in 1 culture and in the early 1970s
Describe the weakness of ethical issues in Rosenhan (1973).
Only permission that was gained was for Rosenhan’s own admission, and even then it was only with the hospital administrator and the chief psychologist in one institution. None of the other staff in any of those tools were aware of the ruse.
It could be argued that their actions affected the amount of attention given to those who are genuinely ill
However, testimonies of pseudo patience suggested this was not true as the staff had very limited contact with the patients.
This was measured as an average of 6.8 minutes per day pursuit patient to include admission, discharge and will medication, suggesting this was not the case.Arguably, the breach of ethical guidelines is justifiable in the public interest.
define schizophrenia
psychotic disorders that are characterised by major distrubances in thought, emotion and behaviour
How long must a person have symptoms until they are diagnosed with schizophrenia?
At least one month of active symptoms and experienced disturbance to every day functioning for at least 6 months.
What are the 4 key symptoms of schizophrenia and explain them?
- Thought insertion- When a believes their thoughts to not belong to them and have been implanted by an external source.
- Hallucinations- Involuntary, vivid and clear perceptual experiences that occur in the absence of any external stimuli. These can be visual or auditory.
- Delusions- ‘Fixed beliefs that are not amenable to change in the light of conflicting evidence’ eg persecutory believing someone is trying to harm you. Referential believing that social or environmental queues have special personal meaning. Grandiose believing you’re exceptional.
- Disorganised thinking- inferred from a person’s speech. A person might switch from one topic to another jumbling seemingly unrelated ideas together. Word salad.
What are 3 features of schizophrenia?
- Lifetime prevalence of 0.3-0.7%
- Onset is later in women. early-mid 20s men and late-20s in women.
- Positive symptoms reduce over time but debilitating negative symptoms often remain.
What are examples of negative symptoms of schizophrenia?
- diminished emotional expression (flat effect)
- abolition (lack of goal directed behaviour)
- alogia (poverty of speech)
Give a strength and a weakness of diagnosing schizophrenia
Strength- Sartorius et al quoted high kappa of 0.86 and only 3.8% of clinicians said they lacked confidence in their diagnoses of schizophrenia using the ICD-10.
Weakness- Different cultural differences to the psychologist can make diagnosis difficult. Rastafarians use neologisms which are a play on English words. If a clinician was unaware this could be a symptom of schizophrenia.
Why did the theory of Hyperdopaminergia gain support?
In the 1950s two antipsychotic drugs called chlorpromazine and reserpine were found to be helpful in alleviating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
However they also induced tremors and muscle rigidity.
Which are symptoms of Parkinson’s disease which is caused by low levels of neurotransmitter dopamine.
What were the 2 explanations for high levels of dopamine?
- Low levels of beta hydroxylase, which is the enzyme that breaks down dopamine. Causing a build up of excess dopamine in the synapse.
- Proliferation (duplication) of D2 dopamine receptors on the post synaptic cells may be responsible for hyperdopaminergic activity.
What did Davis contribute to the dopamine hypotheis?
Positive symptoms of schizophrenia may be the result of excess dopamine in the mesolimbic pathway.
Negative symptoms may be the result of hypodopaminergia in the mesocortical pathway.
What did the drug clozapine do and how did this impact the dopamine hypothesis?
Clozapine binds to D1 and D4 dopamine receptors, and only weakly on D2 receptors.
(The original dopamine hypothesis focused on D2 receptors)
Clozapine also binds to serotonin receptors and greatly reduces both positive and negative symptoms.
Therefore hypothesised that negative symptoms are caused by irregular serotonergic activity.
Serotonin regulates dopamine levels in the mesolimbic pathway.