Clients Who Are Danger To Self Or Others Flashcards
Duty to warn/protect
- Tarasoff Decision
- -orginally stated as duty to warn then changed to duty to protect.
- -psych to communicated a “serious threat of physical violence against a reasonably identifiable victim”
- -psych should notify intended victims and law enforcement
- -psych should only disclose info needed to protect the intended victim.
- Ewing v. Goldstein
2004, the court expanded the meaning of patient’s communication to include communications from the patient’s “immediate family members”; communication from a patient’s family member may trigger the psych’s duty to protect.
–“serious” and “physical violence” includes grade bodily injury
- Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA)
an exception to privilege when a client poses danger to self, others or property.
—medical info may be disclosed, consistent with appplicable law and standards of ethical conduct, by a psychotherapist..if the psychotherapist in good faith, believes the disclosure is necessary to preventer lessen a serious and immense threat to the health/safety of the victims, and the disclosure is made to a person to prevent/lessen the threat or target.
- Situations in Which the Duty to Protect Does NOT Apply
- Someone other than the client is the dangerous 3rd party: must have patient-client rel.
- Someone other than a family member reports that a client has threatened to harm someone: the psych does not have duty to protect if it’s reported by someone who is not a immediate family member (psych should still assess)
- There is NO reasonably identifiable victim(s): if there is no reasonably identifiable victim, psych does not have duty to protect but may want to consider hospitalization.
- Client threatens suicide: tarasoff cover’s a third party victim, not the client.
- HIV and Duty to Protect
- -it’s vague and unclear. For physicians and surgeons, they are protected from civim and criminal liablity.
- -Several options:
- Initial course of action is to maintain client’s confidentiality and encourage safe practices; offer to help the client disclose their status; psych should also discuss the possible legal consequences of engaging in unsafe practices.
- If psych believes client is danger to others is due to a mental disorder, the psych may have to involuntarily hospitalize the client.
- The psych may decide to breach client’s confidentiality in order to protect the intended victim, but before doing so, should explain the decision to the client and try to get their consent. If the client does not consent, and the psych breaches confidentiality, he may be charged with professional misconduct
- -consulting with a colleague is always a good option
Involuntary Commitment and Conservatorships
a) client is denier to self or others is immenent or client is gravely disabled
b) danger or grave disability is a results of a mental disorder or alcoholism
c) client has refused or unable to comply with recommendation to enter a psych hospital voluntarily.
- Involuntary Commitment of Adults
5150 begins with a 72 hold, which can be followed by a 14 day hold , and then additional postcertifcation holds
72 hour hold 5150
when a person, as a result of a mental disorder, is a danger to others, self, or gravely disabled, a peace office, member of state facility, mobile crisis, or prof person designated by the county, may upon probable cause, take the person into custody and place him in a facility designated by the county for a 72 hour tx and evaluation
Grave disability
a) a condition in which a person, as a result of a mental disorder, is unable to provide for his basic personal needs for food, clothing, shelter;
b) a condition in which a person has been found to be mentally incompetent
–a psych may initiate a hold but only certain individuals may institute an involuntary hold
During 72 hour hold
–each person admitted shall receive evaluation as soon as possible, and receive whatever tx that condition calls for the full period that they are held. The person shall e released before 72 hours is lapsed only if psychiatrist believes person no longer requires eval and tx.
14 day hold 5250
–after 72 hour hold, the person can be certified for up to 14 days if a) as a result of mental disorder or chronic alcoholism, the person is a danger to self or others, or is gravely disabled and b) there person has been advised tx is required but has not voluntarily consented.
5251 and 5253
require a notice of certification to be signed by two people, and then a copy of the notice is personally delivered to the patient, attorney or advocate
–person must also be informed that they are entitled to a certification review hearing to determine if there is reason to detain him or her
Section 5256
unless the person requested a judicial review, the certification review hearing MUST be held within 4 days on which the person is certified unless they ask for a postponement. Hearings may be postponed for 48hrs
Section 5276 Judicial review by writ of habeas corpus
judicial review shall be in the superior court where the 72 hr eval was conducted if the patient is act icing in his behalf informs the facility in writing,…”
–at the end of the 14 day hold, patient must be released, referred for voluntary tx, or certfify for involuntary tx begin process of appointing a consevator
5260 Post certification hold for suicidal bx
–if person continues to be threat to self, may be confined for additional period not to exceed 14 days