Client-Lawyer Relationship Flashcards
A lawyer declines a client. She gives no reason why.
Proper.
What constitutes “good cause” to reject a court appointment?
MRPC 6.2. Good cause to decline representation exists if: (i) the lawyer could not handle the matter competently; (ii) if the representation would result in an improper conflict of interest (as for example, when the client or the cause is so repugnant to the lawyer as to be likely to impair the client-lawyer relationship or the lawyer’s ability to represent the client); or (iii) if acceptance would be unreasonably burdensome, for example, when it would impose a financial sacrifice so great as to be unjust. MRPC 6.2, cmt. 2.
A casual conversation happens between a lawyer and a potential client. If the facts indicate the client reasonably believes the relationship exists but the attorney does not, then…..
the relationship DOES exist. The CLIENT’S belief is key!
Duty to reject if …
1) violate ethics of law; 2) condition impairs: 2) can be done competently- NO CONFLICT, TO COMPLETION
Client controls ____, lawyer controls ____.
Objective, means
If client and lawyer disagree about methods…
lawyer can withdraw and client can fire.
Lawyer decisions include:
1) procedural tactics; 2) limiting client objectives….manner and scope of cross-examination, choosing a theory of the case
A lawyer can LIMIT scope of representation if….. examples include….
1) reasonable; and 2) client gives informed consent… exclude specific means that might otherwise be used to accomplish the client’s objectives, including actions that the client thinks are too costly or that the lawyer regards as repugnant or imprudent. MRPC 1.2, cmt. 6.
Decisions Made by Client include:
a. Scope of representation
b. Advanced authorization
c. Acceptance of settlement
d. Taking an appeal
Decisions made by criminal defendant
a. testimony
b. right to trial by jury
c. entry of plea
A client ________ constitutional right to compel his lawyer to assert issues if the lawyer decides not to press those issues as a matter of the lawyer’s professional judgment.
DOES NOT have a
A client tells an attorney he can settle for anything over $100K. The client’s house burns down. The next day, the attorney settles thinking it’s the right idea.
Improper. Should have consulted with client because of material change since advanced authorization.
If a lawyer agrees to a settlement without the client’s consent and authorization is subject to discipline, may the opposing party enforce the agreement if the lawyer acted with apparent authority?
Yes!
A client does not want to take an appeal. The lawyer sees that this decision will be materially adverse to the client. Can the lawyer take it without discipline?
No! The decision to take an appeal rests with the client. Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers § 22(1); Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745 (1983).
A lawyer reasonably believes that the client has diminished capacity, is at risk of substantial physical, financial, or other harm unless action is taken, and cannot adequately act in her own interest, the lawyer tells the client’s only neighbor she might hurt herself. Improper?
No. Lawyer may take reasonably necessary protective action, including consulting with individuals or entities that have the ability to take action to protect the client and, in appropriate cases, seeking the appointment of a guardian ad litem, conservator, or guardian to act on behalf of the client. MRPC 1.14(b).
A client is going to gamble all of her money away under the influence of drugs in Atlantic City. The attorney contacts her sister, who she hasn’t spoken to in 10 years in an attempt to support her. Good idea?
NO. Information that relates to the representation of a client with diminished capacity is protected by the confidentiality provisions of MRPC 1.6. Thus, generally, unless authorized to do so, the lawyer may not disclose such information. When taking protective action, including seeking the appointment of a guardian, however, the lawyer is impliedly authorized to reveal information about the client, even if the client directs otherwise, but only to the extent reasonably necessary to protect the client’s interests. MRPC 1.14(c). The lawyer should determine whether it is likely that the person or entity consulted with will act adversely to the client’s interests before discussing matters related to the client. MRPC 1.14, cmt. 8.
In an emergency when the health, safety, or financial interest of a person with seriously diminished capacity is threatened with imminent and irreparable harm, a lawyer may take legal action on behalf of such person even if … OR…. AND….
the person is unable to establish a client-lawyer relationship OR to make or express considered judgments about the matter, AND the person or another acting in good faith on that person’s behalf has consulted with the lawyer.
In emergency for person with serious diminished capacity, a lawyer may not act if…
the lawyer reasonably believes they do not have a lawyer
If a client begins acting criminally using lawyer’s services, lawyer MUST/MAY withdraw
MUST!
At the suggestion of a judge, the attorneys for both parties to a civil action agree to waive additional discovery and to begin the trial immediately. The judge does not know that the client of one of the attorneys has instructed its lawyers in writing not to bring cases to trial without specified discovery, some of which the attorney has not yet accomplished in the case. Although the attorney lacked actual authority to waive discovery here, the attorney had apparent authority, from the point of view of the judge. What can the judge and client do?
The judge may hold the client to the immediate trial date. The client, however, may seek a discretionary release from the waiver from the judge, and may be able to obtain damages from the attorney for acting beyond the scope of her specific authority.
A client suggests a course of conduct that would result in such a violation and criminality. Must the lawyer withdraw.
No, only if he DEMANDS she do it.