Classification of Aphasis Flashcards
Prevalence
the total number of disease cases at a given period of time
Incidence
the number of new cases during some time period
Prevalence of Aphasia
- CVA: 3rd leading cause of death in US
- mortality rates differ across strokes; 8-12% of ischemic strokes and 37-38% of hemorrhagic strokes result in death
- leading cause of disability
- ischemic strokes are more common than hemorrhagic
- Broca’s aphasia is more common in younger pts
- Wernicke’s aphasia is more common in older pts
read over pp98-99 of text (ethnocultural groups)
Fluent vs. Nonfluent Classification (look @ pic)
- pts w/aphasia are grouped according to their fluency of speech
- we are not speaking of fluency (necessarily) as it relates to the presence or absence of stuttering
- some pts have relatively preserved fluency of speech while others have marked difficulty in producing and sustaining fluent speech
- hence our classifications are either fluent or nonfluent
- this classification is based on both deficiencies of language but also on anatomical considerations
Receptive Aphasia
- references deficits in language comprehension
- lesions more posteriorly located in the cerebrum tend to produce more comprehension related issues
- fluent aphasias are considered receptive aphasias
Expressive Aphasia
- references deficits in language production
- more anterior cerebral lesions tend to be associated with language production problems
Aphasia Symptomatology
patients will demonstrate a set of common symptoms:
- paraphasia (various types)
- disorders of fluency (not stuttering per se)
- auditory comprehension
- repetition
- agrammatism vs. paragrammatism
- anomia (word finding difficulties)
- writing problems (agraphia)
- reading problems (alexia)
- visual (gestures)
- apraxia vs. dysarthria or both
Paraphasias
errors in speech consisting of unintended words or sound substitutions
-often considered a central sign of aphasia
most are present in all types of aphasia, as such, (not a significant factor in identification of specific types of aphasia)
3 primary types of paraphasia: verbal (global) paraphasias (unintended word) neologistic paraphasias (made up word) phonemic (literal) paraphasias (sound level)
Verbal (Global) Paraphasia
entire word is substituted
2 types:
[1] semantic paraphasia: substituted word is semantically related to the one intended (e.g., pt says son for daughter) (in same category as intended word)
[2] random paraphasia: substituted and intended words are not semantically related (e.g., window for banana) (no relation to the word intended)
Neologistic Paraphasia
references the use of a meaningless, invented word
pts may refer to an object by their invented, nonsensical term
aka: neologism
Phonemic (Literal) Paraphasia
substitution of one phoneme for another (loman for woman) or the addition of a phoneme (wolman for woman)
different diagnosis than apraxia of speech or speech sound disorder
Disorders of Fluency
aspect of language production; fluent speech flows and is produced with less effort
it is smooth and devoid of too many interruptions
fluency: speech that approximates the normal rate, typical word output, length of sentences and the melodic contour
pts who produce 5+ connected words may be judged fluent
when word output is less than 50 words a minute in conversation, fluency is significantly impaired
Disorders of non-fluency
pts who are nonfluent, tend to speak with a degree of muscular effort not seen in normally fluent speakers.
speech may be slow, deliberate, or limited
utterances may contain fewer words than normal
speech is usually hesitant
Auditory Comprehension
most pts w/aphasia have some degree of difficulty w/auditory comprehension
not dependent necessarily upon fluent or nonfluent status
it is the degree of severity that varies
assessed from simple tasks to more complex multi-steps
Repetition
pts imitation of single words, phrases and sentences
usually more frequently present in cases of impaired auditory comprehension; not always the case though
must rule out true deficit versus inability to repeat secondary to apraxia, etc