Classification and Evolution Flashcards
Why do we classify living things
For our convenience, to make the study of living things more manageable, to make it easier to identify organisms, to help us see the relationship between species
Who first classified living things, how did they do this, what did they produce
- Carl Linnaeus- 1735
- catergorized according to visible features
- 5 main groups- Kingdoms- Plantae, Animalia, Fungi, Protoctista, Prokaryote
- after Kingdom there is phylum, class, order, family, genus and species
Who added to Carl Linnaeus’ classification system, how
- Carl Woese - 1977
- added domain (highest taxonomic rank) - 3- Archaea, Eubacteria and Eukaryote
Describe the current system of classification
8 Taxonomic ranks:
- domain- the highest taxonomic rank- 3- Archaea, eubacteria, eukaryotae
- Kingdom- Traditionally 5 main- prokaryotae (eubacteria, archaea), protoctista, fungi, plantae, animalia
- phylum- a major subdivision of the Kingdom- contains all the groups of organisms that have the same body plan (e.g. possession of a backbone)- 2 in the animal kingdom- Chortata (CNS along back), Arthropoda (exoskeleton)
- class- a group of organisms that all possess the same general traits (e.g. same number of legs)
- order- a subdivision of the class using additional information about the organisms, such as meat eating and vegetation eating animals
- family- a group of closely related genera, such as the dog and cat family
- genus- a group of closely related species
- species- the basic units of classification. All members of a species show some variations, but all are essentially the same.
mnemonic- kings (and) princes can often find grass snakes
Describe the binomial naming system
- genus name followed by species name
- genus name always capitalised, species name not capitalised
- typed or printed text- italics
- handwritten- underlines
- e.g.- humans = Homo sapiens
- Latin- universal language- whenever a species is named, it is given a universal name- every scientist in every country will use the same name- avoids the potential confusion caused by using common names
Who developed the binomial naming system, why
- Carl Linnaeus
- before, species were identified by a common name, or a long and detailed description
- using a common name doesn’t work well because the same Organism may have a completely different common name in different parts of one country, different common names are used in different countries, translation of languages or dialects may give different names, the same common name may be used for different species in other parts of the world
When classifying an Organism, why is it important to study each specimen in detail
- at the higher levels of the ranked system the differences between the organisms can be very great- quite easy to place a species into its domain, Kingdom or phylum
- class can be a little more difficult as the differences between the classes in one phylum may not be very great- longer description of the species may be needed
- as you descend to the lower taxonomic groups, it becomes increasingly difficult to separate closely related species and to place a species accurately- a more and more detailed description of the species is needed
What are two definitions of a species, why do we need the second
- biological definition- a group of organisms that can freely interbreed to produce fertile offspring
- this definition does not work for organisms that reproduce asexually, and it is very hard to apply to organisms that are known only as fossils
- phylogenetic definition- a group of individual organisms that are very similar in appearance, anatomy, Physiology, biochemistry and genetics
Describe the development of classification
- being so similar, the members of a species occupy the same niche in an ecosystem- this fact was used in early classification systems which were based only on appearance and anatomy
- however, it is easy to make mistakes- for example Aristotle classifieds all living things as either plant or animal, and further subdivided the animals into those that live and move in water, live and move on lands, move through the air- based on similarities he observed- but this groups fish with turtles, birds with insects, mammals with frogs
- such early classifications have been adapted and made more accurate as more research is carried out and more information becomes available
- the early classification systems of Linnaeus and other scientists were based on observable features- means they were limited to those features of organisms that you can see
- by the 17th century, scientists had microscopes to help
- traditionally, all living things have been grouped into a number of kingdoms- for many years, the generally accepted number was two- plants or animals- as more living things were discovered and studied closely, it became clear that not all could fit easily into one of these categories
- in the early 2 Kingdom classification systems, the animal Kingdom includes single celled organisms that had some animal like features, and the plant Kingdom included single celled organisms that had plants like features
- later, electron microscopes revealed further details inside cells- made it clear that many single celled organisms share some of the features of both plants and animals- such as chloroplast’s as well as using a flagellum to move around- doesn’t fit clearly into plant or animal
- fungi didn’t fit in either- don’t move about like animals, and the hyphae grow into the surrounding substrate in the same way as roots do, however they do not photosynthesise and they digest organic matter and absorb the nutrients like animals
- Led to adoption of 5/6 kingdom classification system- still based on the observable features of their anatomy, but at a microscopic level
What are the domains and kingdoms included within them
3 domains, 6 kingdoms
Archaea- Archaebacteria
Bacteria- Eubacteria
Eukaryota- Plantae, Fungi, Protoctista, Animalia
Diagnostic features of archaea
- have no nucleus
- have a loop of DNA that is not arranged in linear chromosomes
- have naked DNA- DNA that is not associated with histone proteins
- have no membrane bound organelles
- have smaller ribosome’s than in in other groups
- have cells smaller than those of eukaryotes
- may be free living or parasitic (some cause disease)
- e.g. crenarchaeota
Diagnostic features of Eubacteria
- have no nucleus
- have a loop of DNA that is not arranged in linear chromosomes
- have naked DNA- DNA that is not associated with histone proteins
- have no membrane bound organelles
- have smaller ribosome’s than in in other groups
- have cells smaller than those of eukaryotes
- may be free living or parasitic (some cause disease)
- e.g. E coli bacteria
Diagnostic features of Protoctista
- are eukaryotic
- are mostly single celled, but many algae are multi cellular
- show a wide variety of forms- the only thing that all protoctists have in common is that they do not qualify to belong to any of the other four kingdoms
- show various plant like or animal like features
- are mostly free living
- autotrophic or heterotrophic nutrition- some photosynthesise, some ingest prey, some feed using extracellular enzymes (like fungi do), and some are parasites
- e.g. paramecium
Diagnostic features of Fungi
- eukaryotic
- time exist as single cells called yeasts, or they have a mycelium that consists of hyphae
- have walls made of chitin
- have cytoplasm that is multinucleate
- are mostly free living and saprophytic- meaning that they can cause decay of organic matter
Diagnostic features of plantae
- are eukaryotic
- are multicellular
- are autotrophic- absorb simple molecules and build them into larger organic molecules
- contain chlorophyll
Diagnostic features of animalia
- are eukaryotic
- are multicellular
- heterotrophic- digest large organic molecules to form smaller molecules for absorption
- are usually able to move around
Describe artificial classification
- classification done for convenience
- group things in a way that is easy to remember or in a way that makes it easy to find a particular item
- is based on only a few characteristics
- doesn’t reflect any evolutionary relationships
- provides limited information
- is stable
Describe natural classification
- biological classification involves detailed study of the individuals in a species- they will show variation- as all members of species such as dogs are very similar, we can consider them to be closely related
- different species that are very similar can be considered to be closely related- a genus
- closely related genera will be placed together in a family
- in this way, the whole of the living world can be organised into a series of ranked groups- a hierarchy
- uses many characteristics
- reflects evolutionary relationships
- provides a lot of useful information
- may change with advancing knowledge
How may a natural classification be useful
- a natural classification that reflects real relationships between the groups could be very useful- for example, if we want to find out more about a rare or endangered species, we may not want to risk harming any of the few surviving members of that species. However, if we know of another very similar species that is not endangered, we can carry out research on this second species to provide information that is also applicable to the endangered species- may help us to make conservation more successful.
What is Phylogeny, describe the process
- the study of the evolutionary relationships between species
- it involves studying how closely different species are related
- we can think of all organisms as belonging to an evolutionary tree
- any two species living today have had a common ancestor at some time in the past
- the time at which the two species started to evolve separately is a branch point on the tree
- the common ancestor appears on the tree at that branch point
- the more recent the common ancestor, the more closely related the two species are
- common ancestors do not survive today- we cannot say that we evolved from the apes, or from the gorillas- we evolved from an ancestor that lift at some time in the past- happens that the gorillas also evolved from that same ancestor
What did Linnaeus use to classify organisms, what is the issue with this
- observable features
- organisms adapt to their environments- possible for 2 unrelated species to adapt in similar ways- look very similar- convergent evolution - may be classified in same taxonomic group according to observable features
What do we now use to classify organisms
- biological molecules
- certain large biological molecules present in all living things but have variation
- of we assume the earliest living things had identical versions of these molecules, the differences seen today are as a result of evolution
- organisms with similar molecules will be closely related as they haven’t evolved separately for long
- differences between the molecules in these species reflect the evolutionary relationships
- cytochrome C, DNA
Describe cytochrome C as a way of classifying organisms
- protein used in process of respiration
- all living organisms that respire must contain cytochrome C, but it is not identical in all species
- amino acids in Cytochrome C can be identified- can compare AA sequences in samples of CC from different organisms
- if sequences are the same, the 2 species must be closely related
- if the 2 sequences are different, the 2 species are not so closely related
- the more differences found, the less closely related the species
Describe DNA as a way of classifying organisms
- found in all living organisms
- DNA provides the genetic code- instructions for producing proteins
- code is same for all organisms- it is universal
- changes to the sequences of bases in DNA are called mutations- occur at random
- can compare DNA sequences to classify species
- the more similar the sequence in a part of the DNA, the more closely related the 2 species
- if there are many differences, the 2 species have evolved separately for a long time- can be considered less closely related
- probably the most accurate way to demonstrate how closely related one species is to another
What did Woese change about the classification system, why, what evidence did he use for this
- divided prokaryote kingdom into eubacteria and archaea
- based on face that bacteria are fundamentally to archaea and eukaryote- bacteria have:
- a different cell membrane structure
- flagella with a different internal structure
- different enzymes (RNA polymerase) for synthesising RNA
- no proteins bound to their genetic material
- different mechanisms for DNA replication and for synthesising RNA
What did Woese suggest about the relationship between archaea and eukaryotes
Share certain features:
- similar enzymes (RNA polymerase) for synthesising RNA
- similar mechanisms for DNA replication and synthesising RNA
- production of some proteins that bind to their DNA
Argued the eubacteria and archaebacteria are more different than archaea and eukaryotes- detailed study of ribosomal RNA gene- RNA and DNA are part of basic mechanism that translates genes into visible characteristics created 3 domain system