classic study - Sherif robber's cave Flashcards

1
Q

aim?

A
  • to see whether if strangers placed into groups would form a close bond with each other
  • if the introduction of competition would be enough to cause hostility between the two groups
  • and if hostility could be reduced through the introduction of a super-ordianate goal.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how many ptps were used?

A

22 11 year old boys selected from a sample of 200

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

where were the boys from ?

A
  • all psychologically well-adjusted middle class protestants from Oklahoma.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what design method was used/

A

matched pairs design

  • matched on IQ
  • sporting ability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

did the boys know about each other initially?

A
  • no

- they were put into two groups and neither of which knew about the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what happened during stage 1 in the first week?

A
  • the boys were asked (in their seperate groups) to carry out a series of tasks, still unaware of the other groups
  • their status and roles were recorded in the first week
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what happened in stage two?

A

the boys were made aware of each other and indulged in a competitive tournament of baseball and told that the winner would receive an awared

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what happened in stage three?

A
  • the boys were brought together in order to achieve a superordinate goal which was to fix the water blockage.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what were the results found in stage 1?

A
  • boys has named themselves
  • rattlers and eagles
  • they had appointed leaders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

results for stage 2?

A
  • expressed dislike for the other group when they were made aware of them
  • competition immediately created hostility and close reports of “physical violence” was recorded
  • derogatory names were used such as “sissies” and “stinkers”
  • refused to eat with them
  • raided huts and burnt flags
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

results of stage three?

A
  • hostility was reduced but briefly

- for example the boys carried out with comments such as “laddies first.” when they watched a group movie together.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

did outgroup friendships increase of decrease by the end of the study?

A
  • increased
  • by the end of stage 2 out-group friendships was just 6.4%
  • but by the end of stage 3 this had risen by 36.4%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly