class internal Flashcards
components of a ideal pupil
smart (clothing) positive friendly quiet - not disruptive committed organised polite
Jorgensen
tells us teachers label the students on behaviour and not ability - the obedient are the most favoured
Dunne and Gazely
suggest that teachers felt unconcerned and did little about WC underachievement as they believed parents didn’t care, whereas teachers supported underachieving middle class kids as they believed their parents would support the student
Rist case study
teachers in a school seated children based on their knowledge of their home backgrounds and appearance.
the groups were labelled as tigers, cardinals and clowns
the middle class she sat at the front and supported while the others were more likely WC and she gave lower level tasks to them and gave them less chance to prove themselves
self fulfilling prophecy
A label is attached - WC unintelligent?
Teacher treats pupil accordingly - intelligent more support given and their pushed and given extra work low ability are helped left to underachieve
pupil internalises the teachers expectations
Rosenthal + Jacobson
study called “Pygmalion in the classroom”
used a field experiment to test the teachers hypothesis
gave all students a ‘special test’ to identify the ones who will achieve
the test was actually a normal IQ test
the randomly picked 20% of the students and identified them as ‘spurters’
a year later they returned and you could see the ‘spurters’ had achieved a lot more than the rest of the class
they assumed they had been given extra work and resources
what Rosenthal and Jacobsons case study showed is
teacher labelling impacts the students achievement
if a teacher supports you and believes you can achieve you try harder and believe you can
the self fulfilling prophecy
they should repeat these experiments on more schools
it quite unethical the schools are lied to and it causes harm by leading to 80% of students underachievement
its deterministic - ignores free will and assumes an outcome
Gillborn and Youdell (2001)
found that often schools link streaming to the policy of publishing league exam tables
pupils triage
those who will pass anyway - highbrow knowledge (e.g. elaborated code) pupils typically middle class
borderline C-D students targeted for extra help
hopeless cases - low brow knowledge (e.g. restricted code) typically WC and black
link between league tables and streaming
school league tables are where the schools publish their exam results
schools need a good league table results to encourage parents to send their children there getting the school more funding
streaming generates a good A-C economy for the league tables
teachers then focus on the borderline C-D grade students giving the extra help to get them a solid C grade to make the school look good.
pro school subcultures
ingratiation: pro-school conformity as in the pro-school subculture, with eagerness to please teachers and win favour with them
Compliance: conformity, but basically for what they can get out of schooling, like exam success, not because they necessarily like or enjoy school
anti - school subcultures
intransigence: troublemakers who are indifferent to school, and who aren’t that bothered about the consequences of non-conformity
rebellion: outright rejection of schooling and its values, and involvement in anti-school activity, as in the anti-school subculture
process of joining a subculture
student trued to gain status in school through legitimate means (educational success)
however, despite their attempts, WC students are labelled negatively by teaches and are treated accordingly
WC students ten give up trying to succeed through legitimate means. instead, they seek out other students just like them
students find similar minded people who underachieve
once students have affiliated with their new group they try to gain status in new ways by inverting the norms and values of education
as a result WC studies find new deviant means of gaining status , an a ti school subculture is formed
now part of the anti school group they are further labelled as negative confirming the teachers original view of them pushing the student further into their subculture
Colin Lacey (1970)
yes concepts of differentiation and procrastination to explain how pupil subcultures emerge
differentiation
the process of teachers categorising pupils according to how they perceive their ability and streaming them accordingly