Class differences in achievement - internal factors Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Role of schools

what does Sir Michael Wilshaw (Chief Schools Inspector in England, 2013) say about schools?

A

Sir Michael Wilshaw (Chief Schools Inspector in England, 2013) accepted that schools were still failing poor students in many areas. He suggested:
* there was a problem in attracting the best teachers to schools in disadvantaged areas; if this issue were tackled, this could help to increase achievement for the poor.
* partner weaker schools with more successful establishments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interactionism

what do interactionists focus on?

A
  • processes within the educational system.
  • examines how pupils and teachers react to one another in the education system.
  • small-scale interaction between individuals shapes people’s behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interactionism

How can labeling influence a person’s behavior and self-concept?

A
  • While interacting with others, people interpret behaviour and attach meanings to the behaviour of those around them.
  • This in turn affects people’s image of themselves (their self-concept), and self-concept in turn shapes behaviour.
  • For example, if pupils are labelled as deviants (people who contravene social norms or break rules) their behaviour will tend to be seen as deliberate attempts to cause trouble. The reaction of teachers will lead to the pupils seeing themselves as deviants and because of this they will tend to act in more deviant ways.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Self-concept

what is a self-concept and what do interactionists belive about it?

A
  • Your self-concept is simply the sort of person you think you are (e.g. lazy or hard-working, successful or a failure)
  • To interactionists, your self-concept is strongly influenced by what others think of you (or at least what you believe they think of you).
  • You might not always accept other peoples’ view, but it is difficult, for example, to think of yourself as clever or hard-working if people keep telling you otherwise.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Labelling

what is labelling?

A
  • Characteristics are ascribed to individuals based on descriptions, names or labels.
  • These labels are simplified descriptions and often draw upon common stereotypes about certain types of people, usually negative ones (for example scrounger, delinquent, chav and so on).
  • Once a label is applied, they will be seen through that lens.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Becker (1971) - Labelling

what did Becker do in his study?

A

Carried out interviews with 60 high school teachers in Chicago. Teachers judged students based on how closely they fit the image of an ‘ideal pupil.’

Ideal pupil - Middle class, organised uniform, well-mannered, female, south and east asian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hampel-Jorgensen (2009) - Labelling

what did Hampel-Jorgensen do in his study and what did he find out?

A

Studied two English primary schools and found different teachers have different ideas of the ‘ideal pupil.’

First school was largely working class and discipline was a major problem. Ideal pupil was:
* Quiet
* Passive
* Obedient

Second school was largely middle-class and had very few discipline issues. Ideal pupil was:
* Not just a non-misbehaving pupil
* Strong academic ability
* Polite

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Differences between primary and secondary education

what are the differences between primary and secondary education?

A

Secondary schools:
Dunne and Gazeley (2008) – teachers labelled working-class parents as unsupportive, and middle-class parents as supportive and involved.
- Working class underachievers were entered for easier exams.
- Middle class underachievers were supported and given extra work.

Primary schools:
Rist (1970) – teacher formed labels for students based on home background and separated them into groups. The groups would be seated together.
- Tigers – fast learners – sat closest to the teacher and received a lot of enthusiastic encouragement.
- Cardinals and clowns – weaker and more likely to be working class – sat further away, given lower-level work and less challenging tasks e.g. reading as a table rather than as individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Harvey and Slatin (1976)

what did Harvey and Slatin study and what did they find out?

A
  • Harvey and Slatin used a laboratory experiment to investigate if teachers had preconceived ideas about pupils from different social classes.
  • Used a sample of 96 teachers and 18 photographs of students from diverse social backgrounds.
  • Teachers were asked to rate them based on their performance, attitudes, etc.
  • They found more experienced teachers rated working-class children lower and that this was often based on their own experiences and preconceived ideas about successful pupils
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Self-fulfilling prophecy

what is a self-fulfilling prophecy?

A
  • Something happens because people expect it to happen.
  • For example, predicting that a pupil will succeed in education may give them self-confidence and enhanced motivation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hargreaves, Hester and Mellor (1975) - Self-fulfilling prophecy

what did Hargreaves, Hester and Mellor say about self-fulfilling prophecy and lebelling?

A
  • factors such as pupils’ appearance, how they respond to discipline, how likeable they are, their personality and whether they are deviant leads to teachers attaching labels to pupils as ‘good’ or ’bad’ pupils.
  • These labels are associated with class, and working-class pupils are more likely to fit the stereotype of the ‘bad’ pupil. Once a student has a label, teachers tend to interpret that student’s behaviour in terms of the label, and the student tends to live up to the label they have been given.
  • This results in a self-fulfilling-prophecy, in which the label results in the behaviour predicted by the teacher.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968) - Self-fulfilling prophecy

what did Rosenthal and Jacobson study about self-fulfilling prophecy and lebelling and what did they find out?

A
  • Rosenthal and Jacobson carried out a field experiment on a Californian Primary School.
  • They informed the school that they had a special test that would reveal which children would likely to be ‘spurters’ or have particular academic abilities. In reality, this was simply a normal IQ test.
  • Teachers gave the tests to children and the researchers randomly picked 20% of the sample and reported falsely to teachers that these students were spurters.
  • The results was that, a year later, nearly half of those children labelled as ‘spurters’ had made the most gains in terms of their abilities. This experiment shows the effects of student labelling and self-fulfilling prophecies.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Gentrup et al. (2020) - self-fulfillig prophecy and labelling

what did Gentrup et al. find out about self-fulfillig prophecy and labelling?

A
  • Despite teacher expectations were inaccurate but expectations significantly predicted students’ end-of-year achievement
  • Positive teacher expectations were associated with greater achievement in reading and mathematics, whereas inaccurately negative teacher expectations were associated with lower achievement in reading only.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Streaming

what is streaming?

A

Another result of labelling can be observed through sets and streams.
- Sets: Ability-based groups for one subject
- Streams: Ability-based groups for multiple subjects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Keddie (1971) - streaming

what did Keddie find out about streaming within schools?

A
  • Lower streams, teachers simplified the content to the extent that learning was largely based on common-sense ideas. Those asking questions were often misinterpreted and their questions were seen as an attempt to disrupt the class. They were often ignored or dismissed as irrelevant.
  • Higher streams were taught more in terms of abstract concepts, giving them much more opportunity to develop their understanding. Questions from pupils in higher sets were taken seriously and answered in detail.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Gillborn and Youdell (2000) - streaming

what did Gillborn and Youdell find out about streaming within schools?

A

Due to the marketisation of the education system, schools need to gain a good league position which results in educational triage, the categorisation of pupils into three types:
1. Those who will pass and can be left alone to get on with the work
2. Those with potential who can get a grade C with help
3. No hope

Working class and black students are more likely to be in the 3rd category. The pupils in lower sets were often denied the chance to sit higher-tier GCSE exams, meaning they could not get GCSE grades above a C grade, so it would be more difficult for them to progress on to some higher-level courses.

17
Q

Evaluation of self-fulfilling prophecy, labelling, streaming

Evaluate self-fulfilling prophecy, labelling, streaming

A
  • It’s too deterministic. E.g. wouldn’t all teachers just label all students as intelligent?
  • Teachers would argue they have professionalism and do not label students.
  • Self-refuting prophecy – Fuller (1984) found that the black girls she researched were labelled as low-achievers, but their response to this negative labelling was to knuckle down and study hard to prove their teachers and the school wrong.
  • Streaming can be positive as it allows teachers to provide different focuses based on ability.
18
Q

Subcultures

what are subcultures?

A

A subculture is a group of pupils who share similar values and behaviour patterns which often emerge as a response to labelling and streaming

19
Q

Subcultures

What does Lacey (1970) say subcultures emerge due to?

A
  • differentiation - process of teachers categorising pupils based on ability, attitide and behaviour e.g. streaming
  • polarisation - pupils responded by moving to pro-school or anti-school subcultures
20
Q

Subcultures

what does Hargreaves (1967) say about subcultures?

A

he argues that students labelled as ‘troublemakers’ formed anti-school subcultures and rebelled against the values of the school e.g. getting int trouble was positive and homework was negative

21
Q

Subcultures

what was Willis’ (1977) study about ‘the lads’ and what did he argue?

A
  • Rejected the values of the school
  • Were hostile to the ‘ear ‘oles’, (swots) who were more likely to be from middle-class backgrounds.
  • Saw little point in schoolwork when they expected to take manual labouring jobs
  • Saw manual jobs as proper work, and middle-class jobs as ‘pen pushing’

Willis argued that labelling and streaming made little difference. It was the position of the boys from different class backgrounds in the class structure that shaped their attitudes to schooling and the formation of subcultures, not the way teachers treated individuals or the way schools were organised.

22
Q

Subcultures

what was Mac an Ghaill’s (1994) study?

A

The school divided pupils into three sets, three distinct male, working-class peer groups developed rather than two:
* Lowest set - ‘macho lads’ - academic failures who became hostile to the school (usually WC) – made no effort with academic tasks.
* Highest set - ‘academic achievers’ - academic ‘successes’ (usually skilled working-class) – tried hard at school and were aiming to progress to higher level study.
* Middle set - ‘new enterprisers’ - positive attitude to school and schoolwork - saw the vocational curriculum as a route to career success rather than academic subjects.

23
Q

Subcultures

what was Hollingsworth and Williams (2009) study?

A

Middle-class students:
* Emphasised that they did not belong to working-class groups.
* Looked down on what they saw as their immoral, anti-social behaviour and their poor taste.
* Saw WC students as arrogant, flashy, loud, uninterested in learning and lacking in self-control.
* Saw themselves as investing in their educational future.

24
Q

Student identities

What is meant by ‘symbolic capital’ in the context of middle-class and working-class habitus in schools?

A
  • Schools have a middle-class habitus which allows middle-class pupils to gain ‘symbolic capital’ (status) from the school.
  • Working class habitus is viewed as worthless (e.g. clothing) and do not receive ‘symbolic capital.’
25
Q

Student identities

what does Bourdieu argue about symbolic capital and symbolic violence?

A

Bourdieu argues that withholding symbolic capital is ‘symbolic violence’ – this reinforces the class system and keeps the WC students ‘in their places.’ WC students feel alienated and isolated

26
Q

Student identities

what is Archer et al’s (2010) study is ‘Nike Identities’?

A

Working class identified themselves as ‘Nike’ is comparison to the middle class ‘Gucci’ which provided working class students with symbolic capital. Staff feared that the consumer lifestyle could led to pressure of being involved in illegal economic activities.

Students:
* not able to afford a ‘Nike’ identity would be mocked for wearing lesser brands.
* led to clashes with teachers (e.g. over trainers or make-up) which led to them being further marginalised.
* were aware of financial pressures and knew of ‘shady activities’ that could help them financially.
* were aware that university would mean that their lifestyle would be limited and as such decided it was not for them.

27
Q

Social policy and social class

what are the two types of educational policies relating to class?

A
  • those specifically aimed at reducing class inequalities
  • policies that have had an impact on class inequalities even though this is not their main aim
28
Q

Social policy and social class

How does cultural deprivation theory affect policies to reduce class inequality and what does Whitty (2002)n argue?

A

Many policies aimed directly at reducing class inequality have been based upon cultural deprivation theory which have led to the idea of positive discrimination in the form of compensatory education.

However, Whitty (2002) argues that these schemes blame the child and ignore wider inequalities.

29
Q

Social policy and social class

what is the Educational Priority Areas program?

A

it is a government initiative in the later 1960s that provided additional funding and resources to schools in areas of deprivation

30
Q

Social policy and social class

what is the Education Action zones program?

A

a partnership between schools, local businesses amd other organisations to improve educational standards in areas of social deprivation

31
Q

Social policy and social class

what is the Sure Start program?

A

provides support for children under the age of 4 and their families in disadvantaged areas

32
Q

Social policy and social class

What is marketisation in education, and how is it supposed to improve schools?

A

Marketisation involves trying to get state-run services to be organised more like private companies in which good or services are bought and sold in a market. Consumers (parents and students) choosing schools would force schools to act like businesses to attract more students and funding. This will force schools to constantly try to improve and provide a better overall service (in theory).

33
Q

Social policy and social class

what is ‘cream skimming’ and how does it affect the middle class parents?

A

Schools try to attract the ‘best’ students who will do most to boost their league table results. Middle-class parents have more resources to manipulate the system to get into the ‘best schools.’

34
Q

Social policy and social class

how does ‘cream skimming’ create a polarised school system?

A
  • successful schools - over-subscribed and well-funded (largely middle-class)
  • less successful schools - undersubscribed and largely working-class.
35
Q

Social policy and social class

what does Lloyds (2013) argue?

A

he argues that well-off parents were paying extra to live in the catchment areas for the most successful state schools. Houses near the best-performing state secondary schools cost an average of £31,000 more than houses in neighbouring areas outside the school catchment area