Class 3 Notes - Variables + Constants Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Variables have at least

A

two levels.

  • Can take on more
  • Do you like ice cream? Yes or no? - 2 variables
  • Do you like ice cream? Yes, no, or a little bit? - 3 variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Constants have

A

only one level.

How many people have COVID-19?
• Examining a constant

What percentage of people have COVID-19?
• Dealing with a variable
• Either you do, or you don’t have COVID-19

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Variables are either

A

measured or manipulated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

• Measure:

A

whether ppl are in a happy or sad mood - asking with clipboard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

• Manipulate:

A

systematically changing people to be at one level or another - showing people a video that induces happiness or sadness/giving people writing prompts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Variables are defined either

A

conceptually or operationally

  • Concrete things, actually assessing/manipulating
  • For any given concept, like happiness, thousand different ways to manipulate the concept
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Conceptual variable:

A
  • Boredom, an emotional state
  • It is not a thing, physical object
  • Bc we cannot count up boredom, we have to operationally define boredom - put it into concrete terms
  • Boredom is commonly seen as an affective state compose of lack of stimulation, low physiological arousal, and unpleasant feelings
  • How to measure boredom? Surveys, physiological measures (brain activity pattern, skin conductance, pupil dilation), observer ratings
  • (Conceptual or theoretical definition vs. Operational definition)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Identify a variable. Identify a constant.

A

Identify an operational variable.
• 3 different time periods: Feb.-Apr., May-July, Aug-Election Day
• 2 different types of news: fake news, mainstream news - would need to come up with operational definitions for these variables

Identify a constant.
• Engagement: everything depicted in this figure is engagement

Identify an operational variable.
• Decisions about how many time period to use
• Important consequences is the interpretation of data
• Engagement that occur one day apart from each other, could be sorted in very separate bin of time - April 31st vs May 1st

Identify a conceptual variable
• Time itself
• Time is abstract
• Seconds/minutes/categorizations of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 claims

A

frequency

association

cause-and-effect claims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

frequency

A

only assess one variable, one constant

o 1 in 25 teens attempts suicide

o 44% of Americans struggle to stay happy

o 58% of Boulder residents exercise frequently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

association claim

A

two measured variables

o Shy people are better at reading facial expressions

o People who multitask the most are the worst at it

o Screen time not linked to physical activity in kids

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

causal claim

A

indicator words of causality enhance, give, curb more exciting, dramatic words

o Music lessons enhance IQ

o Whiff of rosemary give your brain a boost

o Family meals curb teen eating disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

association or causal?

A

next slides (A/C)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(A/C)

• Boredom makes people more creative

A

o Causal; makes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

• Memories work better in colour

A/C

A

o Causal; work better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

• Millennials dedicate an hour a week to selfies
A/C

A

o Frequency claim; constant (millennials) and a variable (amount of time taking selfies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

• Your IG filters could predict if you’ll suffer from depression
A/C

A

o Association; predict

o Can be reversed/flipped - true either way (cause and effect only work in one direction)

18
Q

A/C

• People who met their spouse online score slightly higher on marital satisfaction

A

o Association; slightly higher

19
Q

a/c

• Viewing cat videos boost energy and positive emotions

A

o Causal; boost

20
Q

• Kids who eat cereal and milk for breakfast have a healthier body weight than kids who skip breakfast
a/c

A

o Association; can be flipped; a prediction

21
Q

• Putting your kids to bed earlier might improve their mental health
a/c

A

o Causal statement; improve implies cause and effect

22
Q

4 validities

A
  • construct
  • external
  • internal
  • statistical
23
Q

construct validity

A

o The transition from conceptual variable to operational variable

o How well was variable defined/measured

24
Q

external validity

A

o Do the results, apply to difference people/situations/real world?

o Do they generalize over the course of time? 20 years from now?

o How far can we push the finding, still being accurate

25
Q

internal validity

A

o Our confidence in being able to identify the true cause of the result

o 3rd variables? Confounds?

26
Q

statistical validity

A

o Are the statistics appropriate for the research design?

o Do the statements correspond with the data?

27
Q

Relationship between variables

A

• Is age related to physical activity?
o Do younger or older people exercise more?
 Conceptual variables: age, physical activity
 Operational definition for physical activity: as the number of miles people run per week

• Is distraction while studying related to exam performance?
o Do people perform better when they are not distracted, than when distracted?

28
Q

simple relationship between quantitative variables

A
  • Positive
  • Negative
  • No relationship
  • Correlation coefficient - r
  • Curvilinear
29
Q

scatterplot lines

A

• The steepness of the line
o The steeper the line: stronger relationship

• The degree to which each of those dots miss the line
o Farther from line: weaker relationship
o Closer to line: stronger relationship

30
Q

Two Ways of Studying Relationships

A

• Non-experimental method:
o do not manipulate
o only measure
o can not make inferences of causality

• Experimental method:
o manipulate variables
o allows us to make inferences of causality

31
Q

non-experimental advantages + disadvantages

A
•	Advantages
   o	Natural behaviour, no interference
        	Example, littering behaviour
   o	Some variables cannot be manipulated
        	Example, height/sex
   o	Great for prediction
        	Bc we can closely replicate real-world
   o	Can be efficient

• Disadvantages
o No experimental interference = no control
o No causal inference
o 3rd variable problem: wealth might cause both happiness and exercise, when we try to measure the relationship between H & E, we might be measuring an unknown 3rd variable (ex. wealth)

32
Q

Problems with non-experimental methods

A

• Unknown direction of cause and effect
o Does exercise cause happiness?
o Or does happiness cause exercise?

• Uncontrolled 3rd variables
o Perhaps wealth causes both happiness and exercise?
o If so, exercise and happiness will appear to be related, even when they are not causally related

33
Q

experimental method advantages + disadvantages

A
  • Allows cause and effect inferences!
  • Manipulate variable 1 and observe the effect on variable 2

• Control all other variables

• Advantages
o Causal inferences
o High researcher control
o Can observe small or transient effects
 The number of milliseconds to identify a word

• Disadvantages
o Unrealistic
o Crappy predictions
o Not always possible to manipulate variables (participant variables: age, height, sex, gender)

34
Q

effect of IV on the DV

A

• Does distraction cause poor academic performance on an exam?

• Independent variable: distraction - is the cause
o “cause”
o Aka, manipulated/situational variable or IV
o Variable that we manipulate, or change

• Dependent variable - academic performance
o “Effect”
o “Depends” on manipulated variable
o Aka, outcome/response/measured variable
o Variable that we measure

35
Q

participant variable

A
  • Characteristics that participants bring to study
  • Background learning/knowledge

• Biological characteristics
o Right/left handed
o Personality traits
o Sex

• Usually cannot (ethically) manipulate
o Quasi-experimental

36
Q

establishing causality

A

1) Covariation, or relationship, between IV and DV variables

2) Temporal precedence
o Causes must precede effects
o IV precedes DV

3) Eliminate alternative explanations, or third variables/confounds
o IV is the only variable impacting DV

37
Q

eliminating alternative

A

• Experimental Control
o Extraneous variables are held constant

• Randomization
o Random assignment of participants to conditions
o Run the conditions of the study in a random order

• Some other variable could not cause the relationship between X and Y

38
Q

confounds

A

• Confound is a variable that a researcher manipulates that is not directly related to the hypothesis
o Confounds must covary with IV
 When the IV is present, confound is present
 When the IV is absent, confound is absent
o Confounds must cause change in DV

39
Q

confound example

A
  • hypothesis: listening to relaxing music improves test performance
  • method: randomly assign participants to either wear headphones and play relaxing music or a control condition
  • IV: listening to soft music vs control
  • DV: test performance
40
Q

Example: Music and Exam-Anxiety

A
  • Confounding variable: variable that researcher manipulates that is not directly related to the hypothesis
  • Must vary with IV
  • Must cause change in DV
41
Q

Internal Validity

A

 What does it mean for something to be valid? Is the phenomenon, the finding, real? (Or is is a fluke?)

 Internal validity = is the cause valid

 Why isn’t soft music a valid cause?
o Uncertainty about whether soft music is the cause - it could be the presence of headphones
o Special treatment could be a 3rd variable
o Internal validity is low

 Experimental control = best friend of internal validity
o Random assignment - control participant variables