Civil Liberties Flashcards
What are Civil Liberties
Constitutionally established guarantees that protect citizens, opinions, and property against arbitrary government interference.
Allows unpopular minorities to speak their mind and act as they desire, in all, it lets people live to their preferences.
What are Civil Rights
They reflect positive acts of government (in the form of constitutional provisions or statutes) for the purpose of protecting individuals against arbitrary or discriminatory actions.
Habeas Corpus
Guaranteed in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution which guarantees you the right of due process, to see a judge to see what you’re accused of before you’re taken away.
Lincoln suspended this during the Civil War..
Bills of Attainder
Prohibited in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution, it prevents a certain group of people from being declared as criminals without reason.
Ex Post Facto Laws
Prohibited in Article I, Section 9; which basically states that if you are already given a consequence for anything (i.e. crime), the feds can’t go back and change the punishment.
Article III of the Constitution
Guarantees a trial by jury in the state where the crime was committed and it defines treason and how it’s only limited to the life of the person convicted, not to their heirs.
Substantial Civil Liberties
restraints limiting what the government shall have the power to do, such as restricting freedom of speech, freedom of religion, or freedom of the press
Procedural Civil Liberties
Rules regarding how the government must act.
Barron v. Baltimore (1833)
Established that the provisions of the first eight amendments applied only to the national government, not to the states
The Fourteenth Amendment
No state in the U.S. shall deprive any person of their civil rights (life, liberty, property) without due process of law. It allows equal protection under the law to all citizens, protecting their privileges and immunities.
Equal protection; due process protected; protects privileges and immunities.
Selective Incorporation
Chosen over total incorporation by the Supreme Court, a constitutional doctrine that ensures states cannot enact laws that take away the constitutional rights of American citizens that are in the Bill of Rights.
Palko v Connecticut (1937)
The Fifth Amendment right to protection against double jeopardy is not a fundamental right incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment to the individual states.
No double jeopardy in the states.
Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy R.R. v Chicago
1897, established Eminent Domain, which allows a government or its agent to take private property for public use, with payment of compensation.
Gitlow v New York
1925, found that the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits states from infringing free speech, but the defendant was properly convicted under New York’s Criminal Anarchy Law because he disseminated newspapers that advocated the violent overthrow of the government.
Brought the 1st Amendment to the States
Near v. Minnesota
1931, Minnesota cannot infringe on malicious material published in newspapers, as it denies the freedom of the press in the First Amendment.
Hamilton v. Regents of the University of California
1934, where students filed suit to protest mandatory military training at U.C.s on religious grounds. Court upheld the right of California to mandate that its students receive military training as permissible under the First Amendment’s free exercise of religion clause.
DeJonge v. Oregon
1937, DeJonge conviction for addressing a meeting of the Communist Party was overturned as an infringement on freedom of assembly.
Schenck v. US (1919)
Established the clear and present danger test, such yelling fire in a theater and bomb in an airport is not protected under the First Amendment.
What is the bad tendency test?
Established in Gitlow v. New York, which allows restriction freedom of speech if it poses illegal activity such as anarchy.
Dennis v. US (1951)
Established the clear and probable danger test, which established that advocates of the Communist Party and conspiring to overthrow the government are protected by the First Amendment.
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
Established the imminent lawless action test, which defines the limits of freedom of speech, such as inciting violence.
Symbolic Speech
is nonverbal “speech” in the form of an action such as picketing, flag burning, or wearing an armband to signify a protest. The first amendment protects them because they do not threaten lawless action.
Commercial Speech
Advertising statements have limited protection under the First Amendment.
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
Parodies are protected under the first Amendment in favor of Hustler Magazine, because the parody is subjective and no one would have accepted it as fact. Public figures cannot sue against parodies too.
Obscenity
Indecent or offence speech or expression, is not protected under the First Amendment.
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)
Established that fighting words, speech that inflicts or results in public disorder and the conviction against it does not violate first amendment rights.
Fighting words not protected by the first
SDSU Free Expression Policy
Modified in 2010, for free expression purposes.
The Occupy Movement
Began in 9/17/2011, when 1000 marchers expressed their right of assembly down Wall Street and spoke out against economic inequalities and the corrupting influence of unregulated financial actors in politics. Many violations of civil liberties were conducted throughout many cities in this movement.
Prior Restraint
Means censorship - the attempt to block the publication of material that is considered to be harmful.
See Near v. Minnesota too
Establishment Clause
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
Free Exercise Clause
Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of any religion
U.S. v. O’Brien (1968)
O’Brien burning draft cards was not protected under the First Amendment because it was symbolic speech because it violated federal law.