Civ Pro Flashcards
Forum-Defendant Rule
Removal is improper if:
1. SMJ solely arises from diversity jdx; and
2. any D is from the state which the claim is filed in
*this does not apply if the claim is a fed Q issue
Does Supplement Jdx only apply if there is diversity?
NO – applies to both Fed Q and Diversity
- claims share
- common nucleus of operative fact
- as claim w/in court’s original jdx
When does the “100-mi Bulge Rule” Apply?
- D added to suit via impleader or required joinder
- Served w/ process w/in 100 miles of court
**Rule does not apply to D’s in the OG complaint!
When will a court agree to transfer venue?
OG suit could have been filed in that district
- Convenience of parties
- Witnesses & E in other state
- Interest of justice to any judicial district that
-A. where suit could have been originally brought; or
-B. to which all parties have consented
Venue
Case may be brought in any fed district where:
- any district where a D resides, if all Ds reside in same state
- substantial party of events giving rise to claim occurred in the district, or if property is located there
- any D is subject to court’s PJ (if 1+2 do not work)
What must a court do when venue is improper?
District court must either:
- Dismiss case
- Transfer case to proper venue (if interest of justice requires)
Relation Back
FRCP 15
GR: amended complaint filed after SOL expires is prohibited, unless it relates back
Applies to (1) new claim or (2) changes in party due to mistake
Must arise out of STO
Relation Back: New Claims
Amended complaint post SOL relates back to OG complaint if:
- SOL allows it; or
- new claims arises from STO as OG pleading
Relation Back: Changing Ds
Amended complaint post SOL relates back to OG complaint if:
- SOL allows it; or
- STO as OG pleading and
- new party has notice of suit w/in 90 days of OG filing
- new party knew (should have known) they would be sued but for mistake concerning party’s ID
***IF changing D is not due to mistake, FRCP 15 does not apply
What happens when a party does not object to the jury instructions, but then post-verdict argue that the instructions were plain error
Challenge error in jury instruction
Depends on if the party’s substantial right was affected by error –> if so, then COA can hear the appeal, which is reviewed only for plain error
If no sub right affected –> COA will not hear appeal
Jury Instruction Objections
FRCP 51
- must distinctly state objection & grounds on record
- must object at court-appointed time or promptly after learning of proposed instruction
NOTE: failure to objection won’t 100% bar appeal. If there was a substantial error, COA will review the plain error
Voluntary Dismissal
When P dismisses a suit
Dismisses w/o leave when:
1. notice of dismissal filed before D serves answer or 12motion
2. all parties sign stipulation of dismissal
Usually w/o prejudice, unless:
1. P previously dismissed fed/state claim based on the same claim; or
2. notice or stipulation states otherwise
Involuntary Dismissal
When D moves to dismiss (usually w/ prejudice) suit when P fails to:
- prosecute own action; or
- comply w/ court rules/order
Can move to dismiss via:
1. pre answer motion
2. judgment on pleadings
3. SJ
When is an involuntary dismissal w/o prejudice
- court order says so
- dismissal based on lack of jdx, improper venue, failure to join required party
Compuslory Counterclaim
claim that:
- arises from STO as OP’s claim; and
- do not have to add another party that will destroy jdx
- must be asserted in pending suit
- otherwise it is waived
So even if the parties are not diverse, but OG party has jdx, the court will extend supplemental jdx over the other new party