CIA.IFRS17-PAA Flashcards
Describe the carrying amount for LRC using PAA (calculated at initial recognition)
Premiums received (at initial recognition)
minus acquisition cashflows at that date (unless already expensed)
plus any assets for acquisition cashflows derecognized
minus liabilities previously recognized
Prem recv - acq exp + acq CF derocog - liability previously recog
Identify differences between GMA and PAA for calculating LRC
- PAA is simpler
- PAA doesn’t require estimation of FCFs (Fulfillment Cash Flows)
- PAA doesn’t require a CSM (Contractual Service Margin)
Is a group PAA eligible if an insurer expects significant variability in the FCFs creating a material difference between the PAA and GMA estimates?
No, this disqualifies the use of PAA
How can you determine if LRC using PAA differs materially from LRC using GMA?
Quantitative assessment:
- Calculate LRC using PAA & GMA and verify that the difference is ≤ materiality threshold
Qualitative assessment:
- Assess a similar group of contracts (ex: if that similar group uses PAA, then may be safe to assume this one can as well)
If a group of onerous contracts is PAA eligible, what further adjustment to LRC is required?
Must add a “loss component”
- Loss Component = (LRC using GMA) - (LRC using PAA)
Therefore, LRC using PAA will equal LRC using GMA and there will be no difference between the two
Eligibility criteria for using PAA instead of GMA
- The coverage period of each contract in the group is ≤ 1 year
- The entity reasonably expects that such simplification would produce a measurement of the LRC for the group that would not differ materially from the one that would be produced under the GMA approach
If criteria 1 is satisfied, don’t need to check criteria 2
Also, source text mentions that eligibility criteria 2 is not met if an insurer expects significant variability in the FCFs creating a material difference between the PAA and GMA estimates of FCFs
Is the PAA eligibility for reinsurance contracts held assessed separately from the PAA eligibility for the related underlying insurnace contracts covered by reinsurance?
Yes, they are assessed separately.
This is because reins. contracts that are on a risk-attaching basis could have a boundary up to 2 years (even though underlying would have 1 year), and therefore such contracts wouldn’t meet criteria 1 for PAA eligibility (term of 1 yr or less)
Loss-Occuring contracts would have a boundary of 1-yr, meaning they would satisfy criteria 1
When is a new qualitative assessment for a group required? (to see if they are eligible for PAA)
If market conditions change significantly from the original assessment
For ex: changes in interest rates, inflaiton, auto reforms, etc.
Also, subsequent modifications to the terms of contracts may results in a re-assessment of eligibility