CIA.IFRS-1 Flashcards
What does it mean for an insurance contract to be onerous?
A contract is onerous at the date of initial recognition if there is a net outflow for the sum of:
- FCFs (Fulfillment Cash Flows)
- Acquisition Cash Flows
- Cash flows arising from the contract at the date of initial recognition
IFRS 17 definition of a reinsurance contract
An insurance contract issued by one entity (the reinsurer) to compensate another entity for claims arising from one or more insurance contracts issued by that other entity (underlying contracts)
Based on IFRS 17, how shall an entity, at minimum, divide a portfolio into groups?
(a) a group that is onerous at initial recognition (if any)
(b) a group that has no significant possibility of becoming onerous (if any)
(c) a group of any remaining contracts (if any)
Is an entity permitted to reassess composition of groups after initial recognition?
No. Group composition is established at initial recognition and shall not be reassessed
(although it can change between onerous & non-onerous)
Does IFRS 17 permit disaggregation of individual insurance contracts
No (usually). Under IFRS17, the lowest unit of account is the insurance contract.
In most cases, it is not permitted to disaggregate individual insurance contracts
How are multi-line reinsurance contracts aggregated into portfolios/groups under IFRS 17? (3 ways)
(a) based on the predominant exposure covered
(b) Creating a portfolio/group for multi-line contracts
(c) Separating the reinsurance contracts into sub-contracts and assigning those sub-contracts to separate groups and possibly portfolios
Give some examples where it would be appropriate to separate a reinsurance contract issued/held into its contributing components (layers) when the terms or the exposures are significantly different
(a) a global reinsurance contract where some layers are covering a specific region
(b) A contract where some layers are multi-years, while some others are annual
(c) Different commission structures
Consistent assumptions can produce differences between the estimates of FCF for insurance/reinsurance contracts issued and the estimates of FCF for reinsurance contracts held. These differences can arise from different sources, such as
- Contracts grouping
- Contract boundaries
- Discount Rates
- Risk adjustment
Identify considerations when estimating the risk of non-performance of a reinsurer (3)
- Financial strength of the reinsurers
- History of claims and coverage disputes with reinsurers
- Risk of contagion across various reinsurance arrangements
- Delays in payments and concentration risk
- Length of time over which liabilities are expected to be settled
- Collateral available to mitigate risk
Describe the RA associated with reinsurance contracts held
An entity shall determine the RA for non-financial risk so that it represents the amount of risk being transferred by the holder of the group of reinsurance contracts to the issuer of those contracts.
Conceptually could be thought of as the difference in the risk position of the entity with and without the reinsurance held. Could also consider the cost of reinsurance as an indicator of the compensation required for the risk
When estimating the PV of future cash flows and the RA for reinsurance held contracts, the actuary has 3 options:
- Estimate the gross and the net and then calculate the ceded as a difference
- Estimate the gross and the ceded and then calculate the net as a different
- Estimate the net and the ceded and then calculate the gross as a sum
What are the key concepts underlying the risk adjustment:
- The RA for the insurance/reinsurance contracts issued represent the compensation that the entity requires for bearing the non-financial risk associated with writing those contracts
- The RA for the reinsurance contracts held accounts for the non-financial risk transferred from the entity to the reinsurer(s)
How is the provision for reinsurer non-performance risk calculated?
Measured as an estimate of the future cash flows of reinsurance held
Under IFRS 17, the concept of insurance revenue for reinsurance contracts issued may differ from the concept of earned premium for many reasons, including
- For entity applying the PAA, the revenue recognition requirements
- The treatment of reinsurance cash flows that are contingent on claims on the underlying contracts
- The treatment of amounts paid to the purchaser of the reinsurance contracts issued that are not contingent on claims of the underlying contracts
Briefly describe the IFRS17 Treatment of Reinsurance Held (Ceded) and Reinsurance Issued (Assumed) for the following types of cash flows: Is the cash flows contingent on claims (yes or no) w/ examples
No:
- Examples: Reinsurance Premiums, Premium on negotiated reinstatement (i.e. a new contract)
- IFRS17 treatment for reinsurance held (ceded): Reported as part of (or as on offet to) the allocation of premiums paid to the reinsurer
- IFRS17 treatment for reinsurance issued (assumed): Reported as part of (or as an offset to) the insurance revenue
Yes:
- Examples: Claims Incurred, Automatic reinstatement premium
- IFRS17 treatment for reinsurance held (ceded): Reported as part of (or as on offet to) the amounts recovered from the reinsurer
- IFRS17 treatment for reinsurance issued (assumed): Reported as part of (or as an offset to) the insurance service expenses