CHP 38 Flashcards
Profit = revenue – expenditure (Income statement)
Because of the long-term nature of life insurance, the final profit cannot be determined until all the risks have gone off the books.
Waiting for this to happen before the next tranche of business can be written in not practical.
In order to monitor the progress of the business, it is needed to value outstanding liabilities – often annually.
Surplus = value of assets – value of liabilities
Surplus arising = (At+1 – Lt+1) – (At – Lt) or (At+1 – At) – (Lt+1 – Lt) = Profit (balance sheet)
Impact of valuation basis
this will not impact the total surplus over a policy but only the timing.
Analyse the surplus arising over a period in order to:
Assisting management decision making
- Show the financial effect of divergences between the valuations assumptions and the actual experience
- Determine the assumptions that are the most financially significant
- Show the financial effect of writing new business
- Identify non-recurring components of surplus, thus enabling appropriate decisions to be made about the distribution of surplus
- Provide management info
- Give info on trends in experience of providers to feed back into the actuarial control cycle.
Analyse the surplus arising over a period in order to:
Providing information for other purposes
- Provide data for use in executive remuneration schemes
* Provide detailed information for publication in the provider’s accounts
Analyse the surplus arising over a period in order to:
Data and calculation checks
- Validate the calculations and assumptions used
- Provide a check on the valuation data and process, if carried out independently
- Reconcile the values of successive years
- Demonstrate that the variance in the financial effect of the individual levers is a complete description of the variance in the total financial effect.
- Carrying out an analysis of surplus
Determining premiums, contribution and provisions for future liabilities, assumptions will be made. The difference between the assumptions and actual experience will give rise to surplus/profit (shortfall/loss).
2.1. Projecting expected results
To analyse actual performance, one must first determine the expected values against which the actual values should be compared.
When analising experience it is usually needed to project items such as the revenue account and balance sheet as if the actual experience had been the same as expected when the business was written.
This involves building a model of the expected future experience.
2.2. Modeling considerations
The bases for such an exercise will likely be models used when the products were developed.
The result of the initial product pricing models can be combined to build a complete model of the provider’s future revenue accounts.
It is important when building such a model to ensure that the elements of the revenue account are self-consistent in their own right. It is not sufficient to project premiums, investment income, death claims, lapses, etc. independently.
The model is developed by multiplying the profit test results by the expected number of contracts to be sold in each future year. Then in each future year, the number of contracts still in force from previous years needs to be added in. This will then give a model that can be used to build up the expected future progress of the business as shown by the revenue accounts.
As time goes on, a model using actual volumes of business sold can be built up. Comparisons of actual results with this model will identify whether differences between actual and expected outcomes are due to:
- Differences between actual and expected experience, or
* Sales volumes being different from expected
2.3. Comparison of different models
Actual revenue accounts showing actual experience can be compared against projections. This will answer questions such as:
• Has the provider earned more by the way of investment than expected when the product was designed?
• Has the cost of design bean more than what was allowed for/
• Have experience been what was expected – terminations such as death, lapse, surrender, claim etc., inflation?
The answers to such questions will give an initial indication of whether the profitability criterion used in the design is being met in practice. This can be used as feedback into the actuarial control cycle.
3.2. Levers on surplus
Levers are the factors management can influence to increase value.
Ways in which cost of payments and expenses can be managed:
• Reduce the likelihood of claims by:
o Review ongoing claims – e.g. get regular proof on incapacity for income protection
o Good underwriting – new business, claims
o Customer incentives not to claim – excess, bonus
Ways in which cost of payments and expenses can be managed:
- Reduce the likelihood of claims
- Reduce claim / benefit amounts by reinsurance – limit volatility of claims, protect against large claims
- Control expenses
- Increase number of policies that renew / reduce lapses
- Investment policy that increases investment returns – subject to acceptable levels of risk
- Adopt an effective tax management policy
3.4. Reducing claim / benefit amounts
- Use reinsurance
- Reduce future benefit payments – e.g. increase retirement age
- Minimize guarantees – e.g. make increases discretionary and not guaranteed
- Use of excesses – client must pay a small amount per claim
3.5. Controlling expenses
- Reviewing expenses – see when expenses are rising
- Flexible charges / premiums
- Ensure claim expenses are commensurate with claim size