Chp 14 - Love and Hate Flashcards

1
Q

Ethological and Evolutionary Perspective on Love and Hate (4)

A

1) Intra-species Aggression

  • Competition for same resources
  • Sexual jealousy, same-sex rivals

2) Dominance Hierarchy

  • aggression when changes to hierarchy
  • decreases aggression
  • set access to resources

Most violent crime, including lethal violence, is in the context of competition for material goods, status, or related to “face” or sexual jealousy (Daly & Wilson)

Overall access to resources, average wealth, median income are poor predictors

3) Wealth Disparity

  • Ratio of highest income to lowest income
  • Correlation of income inequality & murder r= +.845 (huge correlation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Wealth disparity/ inequality: correlation to: (3)

A
  • Rate of imprisonment
  • Social problems
  • Homicide rate

Some have easier access to resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The Brain and Aggressive Behaviour (3)

A

Prefrontal cortex
Amygdala
Septum: Rage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Prefrontal cortex (The Brain and Aggressive Behaviour) (5)

A
  • inhibitory control over behaviour
  • ↓ activity ↑ impulsive aggression
  • Most sensitive to alcohol (prefrontal and cerebellum)
  • not fully mature until early 20s

Compare inmates with violent vs. Non-violent crimes

  • Non-violent: had more activity in both lateral and medial prefrontal cortex
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Amygdala (The Brain and Aggressive Behaviour) past case

A

Violet behaviours

Charles Whitman 1996

  • Murdered his wife, mother (knife)
  • Shot 14. Wound 31 from an observation deck, uni of texas

In diary wrote about headaches

  • Had a tumour that was exerting pressure on amygdala
  • Correlational data
  • Dysfunctional amygdala: May send dangerous signals despite none
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Family Influences: Parenting Style (4)

A

Authoritative Parents
Authoritarian Parents
Rejecting/Neglectful Parents
Permissive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Authoritative Parents (3)

A
  • Clear, enforced rules
  • Caring, supportive, high expectations
    = high self-esteem, high achievement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Authoritarian Parents (4)

A
  • Strict discipline
  • Cold, unresponsive
    = Low self-esteem, poor performance, low self-control
  • Lead to more impulsivity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rejecting/Neglectful Parents (3)

A
  • No discipline, no guidance
  • Cold, unresponsive
    = Low achievement, withdrawal, poor social relationships, aggression, risky behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Permissive (3)

A
  • No guidance, discipline
  • Warm, caring
    = immature, self-centred, impulsive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Humanistic View on negative emotions (2)

A

Negative emotions stem from lack of positive regard, especially during childhood

Incongruence

  • The match between our ideal self vs. Real self
  • If match, can accept ourselves
  • In turn accept others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Prejudice (3)

A

Negative attitudes

  • Towards others because of their membership in a group, out-group
  • Based on inaccurate, or fictitious information
  • Like all long-held attitudes, resistant to change

Incomplete or fictitious information
Resistant to change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Origins of Prejudice (4)

A

Social Learning

  • Conditioning, observational learning
  • e.g. growing up in families with certain prejudice, modelled

Social Comparison, Social Categorization

  • We divide the world into us and them (Social identity)
  • In group/ out group
  • Tendency to see own group as superior (ego-protection)

Social Cognition

  • From the way we think about others, beliefs about specific social groups

Realistic Conflict Theory

  • Direct inter-group competition or conflict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Prejudice: UCLA study

A

UCLA study:

  • Quick flash of dots, guess how many
  • Over-estimators vs. Under
  • Asked about the characteristics of the other group
  • Think own group is friendlier, and smarter, don’t want to socialize with the other group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Prejudice: Ms. Elliott and Her 3rd Grade Class

A

Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr

Community predominantly white

Therefore try grade 3 class

  • Told them student with blue eyes were better, more privileged

The next day reverse the conditions

  • Blue eyed students performed better on the day they were smarter,
  • Academic performance swapped vice versa

Work together to complete a task: rely on each other:
Helps remove prejudice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Attachment: infant and caregiver(s) (3)

A

The strong, enduring affectional tie between
infant and caregiver(s).

Indiscriminant
Discriminant
Specific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Indiscriminant Attachment

A
  • Newborn
  • Positive emotional display not directed at anyone
18
Q

Discriminant Attachment

A
  • Familiar, 3 months
  • Respond/prefer to familiar faces
  • All members to the family
19
Q

Specific Attachment

A

Begins 7-8 months
Formed 12 months

20
Q

Types of Attachment (4)

A

Secure Attachment
Anxious-Resistant
Anxious-Avoidant
Anxious-Disorganized

21
Q

Secure Attachment (4)

A
  • Explore with parent as a base (make sure parent is there)
  • May or may not cry on separation
  • Reunion: easily comforted
  • About 66% show such attachment
22
Q

Secure Attachment: Future behaviour in relationships (2)

A
  • Fewer behavioural problems, better social relationships
  • Can form emotional relationships with others
23
Q

Anxious-Resistant (4)

A
  • Fearful even with parent present
  • Very distressed when parent is absent
  • Reunion: rejection, anger, but also desire to be close
  • 10 – 15%
24
Q

Anxious-Resistant Attachment: Future behaviour in relationships (4)

A
  • Suspicious, excessive worry about partners
  • Expect partner will leave at some point
  • Ambivalent lovers – want to get close but insecure about relationships
  • Can be easily frustrated or angered
25
Q

Anxious-Avoidant Attachment (4)

A
  • Few signs of attachment
  • Little reaction to separation or reunion
  • Do not seek contact but do not resist
  • 20%
26
Q

Anxious-Avoidant Attachment: Future behaviour in relationships (4)

A
  • May appear not to care about relationships
  • Resist being dependent on others
  • May feel uncomfortable with closeness
  • Trouble trusting
27
Q

Anxious-Disorganized (3)

A
  • Disorganised, Contradictory responses
  • May appear disoriented
  • 5%, esp victims of maltreatment, abuse
28
Q

Attraction (3)

A

Proximity and exposure
Similarity
Physical attractiveness

  • Matching effect
29
Q

Proximity and exposure (2)

A
  • Proximity (nearness) best predictor of who will develop emotional relationships
  • People attracted to those who are familiar, who they frequently see
30
Q

Liking: Similarity (2)

A
  • People most often are attracted to others who are similar to themselves
  • Similarity of attributes, beliefs, and values most important
31
Q

Physical Attractiveness (2)

A

Both men and women rate attractiveness most important for the desirability of short-term dating partners

Matching effect (for long term)

  • Most likely to have partner whose level of physical attractiveness is similar to one’s own
32
Q

Erich Fromm Views (2)

A
  • To alleviate loneliness, we seek contact with others
  • Neo-analytic and Existential
33
Q

Types of Love (Erich Fromm)

A

Motherly love
Brotherly love
Erotic love
Immature love
Mature love

34
Q

Motherly love

A

One-sided and unequal, mother gives love unconditionally

Child learns stability and security

35
Q

Brotherly Love

A

Loving all others, unites the isolated individual with others

(basically love and each for others, not restricted to fam)

36
Q

Erotic Love

A

Temporary intimacy with an other

(argues that it is stage of dev of true love)

37
Q

Immature Love (2)

A

Taking love dominates over giving love;

Partners expected to surrender aspects of self to form a single entity, a shared personality

38
Q

Mature Love

A

Mutual care and support, acceptance, commitment, respect, kindness, friendship, devotion

Requires self-love

39
Q

Partner Selection: Evolutionary Analysis (3)

A

Women Prefer:

  • Older (3 ½ years older)
  • Symmetrical face (a sign of healthy and history of good health)
  • Evidence of high parental investments

Men Prefer:

  • Youth and health
  • Symmetrical face

Averaged over all cultures studied:
*Female preference: mate 3½ years older.
*Real age difference: grooms 3 years older.

40
Q

Evidence of parental investment by males increases attractiveness

A

In picture: show interest of caring for children

Evidence of parental investment, more attractive