Choice Unit B Flashcards
Define the term Personality
Those relatively stable and enduring aspects of individuals which distinguish them from other people, making them unique but at the same time permit a comparison between individuals. [Gross 1992]
*Validity and sophistication of personality studies are consistently questioned
Discuss Social Learning Theory
- In direct contrast to trait theory, proposes that all behavior is learned.
- Learning occurs by way of environmental experiences and through the influence of other people.
- Reductionist
Proposed by: Albert Bandura [1977]
Discuss Trait Learning Theory
- Personality is determined by genetics
- There are two main dimensions to personality: An introversion – extroversion dimension and a stable–neurotic dimension
- Reductionist
Proposed by: Eysenck and Cattell
Discuss Interactionist Learning Theory
- Combination of inherent personality traits and environmental factors
- Suggests strong situational factors, are more likely to predict behavior than personality traits
Proposed by: Kurt Lewin
Outline the Role of our Genes
Emergenesis ⇒ A trait is emergenic if a specific combination of several genes interact. For this reason, emergenic traits will not run in families but identical twins will share them.
Epigenesis ⇒ The study of how and why genes interact with the environment. Non-genetic factors cause the organism’s genes to behave (or “express themselves”) differently.
Outline the Pros and Cons of Personality Assessments
Questionnaires (self-judgement)
Pros:
- Cheap
- Lots of information
- Access to internal events
- Casual Force
Cons:
- Failure to disclose
- Unaware
- Cheap and easy - frequently used
Interviews
Pros:
- Real-world information
- Cheap
Cons:
- No access to private events
- Bias
Observations
Pros:
- Range of contexts
- Appearance of objectivity
Cons:
- Uncertain observations
- Can be costly
- Time-consuming
Outline Ethical Issues with Personality Assessments
Confidentiality:
Use of results ⇒
- Explain use and give feedback - must give informed consent
- Do not use personality tests to decide who makes a team
- Can’t predict behavior in sports without considering other info
Predicting performance: use of results from personality data could be used to predict performance ⇒
- Compare individuals against their own baseline levels rather than against normative information
Outline Validity and Reliability Issues in Personality Assessments
Athletes may fake/falsify responses/behaviors to conceal a perceived weakness (issues with validity and reliability)
How do Team Sport Athletes Behave?
Exhibited less abstract reasoning, more extroversion, more dependency, and less ego strength than non-athletes.
How do Individual Sport Athletes Behave?
Displayed higher levels of objectivity, less dependency, less anxiety, and less abstract thinking than non-athletes.
Name some Ethical Issues with Personality Assesments
- Need to explain use and give feedback
- Need to give informed consent
- Should not be used when deciding who makes a team
- Can’t predict behavior in sports without considering other info
- Could be used to predict performance
Define motivation and name the different types
Def. Motivation is “the internal mechanisms and external stimuli which arouse and direct our behavior”
Intrinsic motivation ⇒
- Comes from within the person
- Doing an activity for itself and for the pleasure and satisfaction associated with it
- Excitement, fun, enjoyment, chance to improve skills etc.
Extrinsic motivation ⇒
- Comes from outside the person.
- External rewards
- Tangible: Money, trophies, prizes
- Less Tangible: Praise, Status
Explain Cognitive Evaluation Theory
Additive principle:
Intrinsic motivation can be boosted by extrinsic motivators
Finding: not always true
Cognitive evaluation theory (Deci and Ryan 1985) developed to explain this (This theory explains the effect of external consequences on internal motivation)
Explain Atkinson’s model of Achievement Motivation
*Motivation is a balance between the motive to achieve success and the motive to avoid failure.
It sees achievement motivation as a personality trait ⇒
Those whose desire to succeed outweighs the fear of failure are said to be high in achievement motivation.
Those whose fear of failure outweighs the desire to succeed are said to be low on achievement motivation
Achievement Motivation = The Desire to Succeed – The Fear of Failure
Differentiate between high and low achievers in Atkinson’s model of Achievement Motivation
High:
- Select challenging tasks
- Display a high level of effort
- Continue to try hard in difficult situations
- Focus on the pride of success
Low:
- Avoid challenging activities
- Exert less effort when they take part
- Exert less persistence when they take part
- Focus on the shame of failure
What are the Components of Atkinson’s model
Personality factors: motive to achieve success, motive to avoid failure
Situational factors: probability of success, incentive value of success
Resultant tendencies: considering and individual’s achievement motive levels in relation to situational factors
Need to avoid failure (NAF) ⇒
A state of mind in which a performer avoids situations in which they think they might not be successful
Need to achieve (NACH) ⇒
The intrinsic motivation to be successful
Differentiate between arousal and stress
Arousal -> is a state in which you feel excited or very alert, for example as a result of fear, stress, or anger. [The sympathetic nervous system closes down the non-essential physiological systems. They accelerate those fight or flight response systems.]
Stress -> Substantial imbalance between the demand (physical and/or psychological) and response capability, under conditions where failure to meet that demand has important consequences.
Describe the Inverted U hypothesis
Implications ⇒ As arousal increases, so too does performance, up to an optimal point. Further increases in arousal cause performance to decline.
Limitations ⇒
- People have different levels of arousal to different stimuli
- Some performers don’t slowly
decrease
Describe the drive reduction theory
Implications ⇒ As arousal increases, so too does performance
Explanation ⇒ Humans are motivated to reduce the state of tension caused when certain biological needs are not satisfied. This theory explains behaviours that have a strong biological Component. Example: you might be driven to drink a glass of water to reduce your sensationof thirst.
Limitations: little research to support this, athletes can perform poorly if overly aroused, people are not always motivated by internal needs.
Describe the catastrophy theory
Implications ⇒ As arousal increases, so too does performance, up to an optimal point. Afterward, a rapid decline in performance - the catastrophe - occurs
Limitations: Difficult to study scientifically (graph
not modelled using data). This may not apply to everyone
General Note: There is an optimal level of CNS arousal for different types of tasks [easier tasks may require higher levels of arousal]
Differentiate between arousal and anxiety
Arousal ->
- A measure of our energy level
- Physiological and psychological activity in a person
- Not automatically associated with pleasant or unpleasant events.
Anxiety ->
- Characterized by nervousness, worry, apprehension
- Negative emotional state
- Doesn’t necessarily affect performance negatively
Name the types of anxiety
Cognitive Anxiety:
The worry component. A chain of negative thoughts and images that are relatively uncontrollable.
Somatic Anxiety:
The physical component. Awareness of physiological changes that provides a signal to the individual that they are anxious. Important to note that somatic anxiety and physiological arousal are similar, but NOT THE SAME.
E.g. a person experiences trembling and nausea may become more anxious because these symptoms are telling them they are experiencing anxiety.
State anxiety: The person’s emotional state at any given time - variable from situation to situation [Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2R)]
Trait anxiety: A person’s disposition to interpreting a situation as threatening and responding with an increase in state anxiety [Sport Competition Anxiety Test (SCAT)]
*Athletes who have a high trait anxiety view more situations as more threatening than those with lower trait anxiety and so respond with a higher state anxiety. This is known as competitive trait anxiety
Evaluate SCAT [Sport Competition Anxiety Test]
SCAT (Sport Competition Anxiety Test) ⇒
Is a self-report questionnaire in which people rate how nervous they
feel both in general and in specific situations.
The scoring system for the questions gives an indication of both
the state anxiety and the trait anxiety of the performer.
Pros:
Info can be used by coaches to reduce worry and build confidence before competitions
Reliable self-report survey
Sport specific measure of pre-competitive state anxiety
Cons:
Athletes react differently to competition - not a one size fits all - coaches
need to realize this
Can’t be given during competition
Social desirability: respondents may “manage” answers so they appear
in a more positive light
What is Psychological Skills Training?
- Psychological Skills Training (PST) is an individually designed combination of methods selected to attain psychological skill needs.
- There is no single perfect PST package, each program must be individualized based on the psychological state of the individual and, the sport.