Choice under uncertainty Flashcards
What are the 5 assumptions of rational consumer preferences?
Completeness, transitivity, continuous, monotonicity and independence
Define completeness
Consumers can always compare/rank bundles. X≥Y or Y≥X or Y∼X – often violated
Define transitivity
If X≥Y and Y≥Z then X≥Z (ceteris paribus)
Define continuous (in context of consumers’ preferences)
If X≥Y and Z is very similar to Y (lies in a small radius of Y) then X≥Z (aka. tiny changes in bundles will not change preference ordering)
Define monotonicity
Consider two lotteries, L and L’’. One lottery will be preferred to the other only if it assigns a higher probability of getting the higher prize (more is better)
Define independence (in context of consumers’ preferences)
If we mix each of two lotteries with a 3rd one, the preference ordering over the two resulting lotteries does not depend on the particular third lottery being used. (introduction of a 3rd lottery does not change order of original 2 lotteries) (aka. I prefer X to Y if I prefer pX+(1-p)Z to pY+(1-p)Z - often violated - Allais paradox
What does Allias Paradox show? Give the example
Shows a violation of the independence axiom. Experiment 1: 1U(£1M)>0.89U(£1M)+0.01U(£0M)+0.1U(£5M) Experiment 2: 0.89(£0M)+0.11U(£1M) <0.9U(£0M)+0.1U(£5M) Rearranging experiment 2 equations: 0.11U(£1M) <0.01U(£0M)+0.1U(£5M) 1U(£1M)-0.89(£1M) <0.01U(£0M)+0.1U(£5M) 1U(£1M<0.89U(£1M)+0.01U(£0M)+0.1U(£5M) Which contradicts the first experiment.
What is a game of ultimatum
1 player gets a sum of money, and is tasked with splitting it between themselves and the other player. The second player can accept or reject the offer, if they accept, each player gets the proposed amount, if they reject, they get nothing shows that people will reject things that they perceive to be unfair, even if it is not in their best interest to reject this - not rational
Define different state of nature
Different outcomes of some random event
Define contingent consumption plan
What will be consumer in different states of nature
What is the expected utility theorem?
A utility function over any lottery can be written as the expected utility of the outcomes that make up this lottery
What is expected utility?
Expected utility (U) = probability of state of nature X level of consumption in that state of nature. We assume states of nature are mutually exclusive
What is St. Petersburg’s Paradox, and what does it show?
A casino offers a game of chance for a single player, in which a fair coin is tossed at each stage. The pot starts at £2, and is doubled every time a head appears. The game ends the first time a tail appears. Thus, the player wins £2 if a tail appears on the first toss, £4 if a head appears on the first toss and a tail on the second, £8 if a head appears on the first two tosses and a tail on the third, and so on. In short, the player wins £2k , where k is the number of tosses. Under expected utility theorem the value of this game is infinity, this is not what happens in real life. Shows that we can not simply define the utility of a lottery bu the expectation of the random variable associated with the lottery.
What is a positive affine transformation, and what are its properties? (in context of transforming an expected utility indifference curve)
Any transformation of a function that can be written in the form: v(u)=au+b, where a>0 Transformation still represents the original preferences, and still has the expected utility function.
What is insurance and how can it benefit consumers?
Someone has to give up γK in the good state to gain K-γK in the bad state. It can change the probability distribution of outcomes