Choice under uncertainty Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 5 assumptions of rational consumer preferences?

A

Completeness, transitivity, continuous, monotonicity and independence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define completeness

A

Consumers can always compare/rank bundles. X≥Y or Y≥X or Y∼X – often violated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define transitivity

A

If X≥Y and Y≥Z then X≥Z (ceteris paribus)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define continuous (in context of consumers’ preferences)

A

If X≥Y and Z is very similar to Y (lies in a small radius of Y) then X≥Z (aka. tiny changes in bundles will not change preference ordering)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define monotonicity

A

Consider two lotteries, L and L’’. One lottery will be preferred to the other only if it assigns a higher probability of getting the higher prize (more is better)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define independence (in context of consumers’ preferences)

A

If we mix each of two lotteries with a 3rd one, the preference ordering over the two resulting lotteries does not depend on the particular third lottery being used. (introduction of a 3rd lottery does not change order of original 2 lotteries) (aka. I prefer X to Y if I prefer pX+(1-p)Z to pY+(1-p)Z - often violated - Allais paradox

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does Allias Paradox show? Give the example

A

Shows a violation of the independence axiom. Experiment 1: 1U(£1M)>0.89U(£1M)+0.01U(£0M)+0.1U(£5M) Experiment 2: 0.89(£0M)+0.11U(£1M) <0.9U(£0M)+0.1U(£5M) Rearranging experiment 2 equations: 0.11U(£1M) <0.01U(£0M)+0.1U(£5M) 1U(£1M)-0.89(£1M) <0.01U(£0M)+0.1U(£5M) 1U(£1M<0.89U(£1M)+0.01U(£0M)+0.1U(£5M) Which contradicts the first experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a game of ultimatum

A

1 player gets a sum of money, and is tasked with splitting it between themselves and the other player. The second player can accept or reject the offer, if they accept, each player gets the proposed amount, if they reject, they get nothing  shows that people will reject things that they perceive to be unfair, even if it is not in their best interest to reject this - not rational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define different state of nature

A

Different outcomes of some random event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define contingent consumption plan

A

What will be consumer in different states of nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the expected utility theorem?

A

A utility function over any lottery can be written as the expected utility of the outcomes that make up this lottery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is expected utility?

A

Expected utility (U) = probability of state of nature X level of consumption in that state of nature. We assume states of nature are mutually exclusive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is St. Petersburg’s Paradox, and what does it show?

A

A casino offers a game of chance for a single player, in which a fair coin is tossed at each stage. The pot starts at £2, and is doubled every time a head appears. The game ends the first time a tail appears. Thus, the player wins £2 if a tail appears on the first toss, £4 if a head appears on the first toss and a tail on the second, £8 if a head appears on the first two tosses and a tail on the third, and so on. In short, the player wins £2k , where k is the number of tosses. Under expected utility theorem the value of this game is infinity, this is not what happens in real life. Shows that we can not simply define the utility of a lottery bu the expectation of the random variable associated with the lottery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a positive affine transformation, and what are its properties? (in context of transforming an expected utility indifference curve)

A

Any transformation of a function that can be written in the form: v(u)=au+b, where a>0 Transformation still represents the original preferences, and still has the expected utility function.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is insurance and how can it benefit consumers?

A

Someone has to give up γK in the good state to gain K-γK in the bad state. It can change the probability distribution of outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is full / actuarially fair insurance?

A

Full insurance makes the expected consumption equal all the states of nature. γ=ρ

17
Q

Draw a graph of insurance - what does the slope of the budget constraint represent?

A

(∆Cg)/(∆Cb )=γK/(K-γK)=(-γ)/(1-γ) Slope of budget constraint = The rate at which we trade consumption in each state / price ratio

18
Q

Define risk aversion, and describe the utility function.

A

Risk averse = expected utility of L < utility of the expected wealth from L

Concave utility function - Eu(L)< u(E(L))

19
Q

Define risk netural, and describe the utility function.

A

Risk neutral = expected utility of L = utility of the expected wealth from L

Straight utility function - Eu(L) = u(E(L))

20
Q

Define risk loving preferences, and describe the utility function.

A

Risk loving = expected utility of L utility of the expected wealth from L

Convex utility function: Eu(L)>u(E(L))

21
Q

What is certainty equivalence?

A

Certainty equivalent = the amount that you are willing to accept instead of the lottery

u(C)=Eu(L)

You are indifferent between the gamble and the amount

22
Q

What is a risk premium?

A

Risk Premium = difference between gamble and certainty equivalent = E(L)-C

For a risk adverse individual, the certainty equivalent < expected amount of money from the gamble

23
Q

How can you measure risk aversion?

A

Either using the absolute risk aversion, or the relative risk aversion.

24
Q

What is the equation for absolute risk aversion, and what is the sign for risk adverse and risk lovers

A

Ra(W)= - u’‘(W) / u’(w)

+ve for risk adverse -ve for risk lovers

25
Q

What is the equiation for relative risk aversion, and what is the sign for risk averse and risk lovers?

A

Ra​(W)= - u’‘(W).w / u’(W)

+ve for risk adverse -ve for risk lovers