Child Custody and Visitation Flashcards
The court may enforce an order for the return of a child made under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction as if it were a ______.
child custody determination
Fam. Code 3442
Notice of 6 month review does not _____ service. Service by mail at last known address was sufficient.
require Convention
In re Jennifer O. (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 539
Although father was not properly served, he made a general appearance through counsel, which _____.
gave court jurisdiction
In re Vanessa Q. (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 128
Hague abduction applies when a child _____ at the time of hearing who was wrongfully removed to or retained in a member country and the child’s habitual residence immediately before abduction was a member country, when removed from a party that had and was _______, or that would have been lawful but for removal.
under 16
exercising lawful rights of custody
Court may refuse to return child only if application was not actually exercising custody rights when child was removed or retained, or applicant _____ in the removal or retention.
consented to or subsequently acquiesced
Court erred by deferring to Greek court under comity where Greek court _____.
misapplied Hague provisions
Asvesta v. Petroutsas (2009) 580 F.3d 1000
Status as undocumented for immigration purposes ______ whether a child is settled in a country.
has no effect on
In re B. Del C.S.B. (2009) 559 F.3d 999
State department adopts consent that rights of custody are only protected if ne exeat orders are given _____. Purpose of Hague is to disallow forum shopping.
full force and effect
Abbott v. Abbott (2010) 560 U.S. 1
A repatriation agreement to change country of residence may be agreement of where children are permanently settled but it is not ______ under Hague.
dispositive
Barzilay v. Barzilay (2010) 600 F.3d 912
Stating intention to return to US, is _____. Consent to DV order with temporary custody orders does not constitute ______ of new country.
not consent or acquiescence of the other party
unequivocal acquiescence or waiver
Nicolson v. Pappalardo (2010) 605 F.3d 100
Finding that application of “unclean hands” for Hague _____.
undermines Hague Convention goals
Karpenko v. Leendertz (2010) 619 F.3d 259
The “retention date” for Hague is the date beyond which the non-custodial parent _____ to child’s continued habitation. Have _____ to file petition.
no longer consents
1 year period
Palencia v. Perez (2019) 921 F.3d 1333
An infant’s “mere physical presence” is not a dispositive indicator for ______. Domestic violence should be fully explored in adjudicating whether a child shall be returned.
determining habitual residence
Monasky v. Taglieri (2020) 140 S.Ct. 719
The 1 year provision does not preclude the left behind parent from asserting the return of the child but the passage of 1 year requires that the court determines _____.
whether the child is now settled.
Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez (2014) 134 S.Ct. 1224
Visiting NY does not make the child _____ to NY.
acclimated
Hofmann v. Sender (2013) 716 F.3d 282
Hague not appropriate where one parent had sole legal custody and did not ______ at the time of relocation.
breach any custody rights
White v. White (2013) 718 F.3d 300
Habitual residence is not the same as _____.
domicile
Guzzo v. Cristofano (2013) 719 F.3d 100
Parties agreement the child would be raised in Ireland does not equate to ______.
habitual residence of Ireland alone
Redmond v. Redmond (2013) 724 F.3d 729
An agreement for shared custody between M in Mexico and F in U.S. was sufficient basis to determine a shared intent to _____.
abandon Mexico and adopt U.S. as habitual residence
Valenzuela v. Michel (2013) 736 F.3d 1173
Traveling to a new country temporarily for relocation of job for one parent ______.
does not modify child’s habitual residence
Neergaard-Colon v. Neergaard (2014) 752 F.3d 526
Habitual residence is a fact based determination based on parents’ ______ regarding child’s residence.
shared intent or settled purpose
Larbie v. Larbie (2012) 690 F.3d 295
Letter discussing settlement was not sufficient basis to find _____.
consent to new residence
Walker v. Walker (2012) 701 F.3d 1110
Exception to return is not best interest is not the standard; the court must make specific findings of _____.
potential for harm
Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley (1995) 58 F.3d 374
Normal readjustment problems do not constitute ______ order.
grave harm sufficient to preclude return
Friedrich v. Friedrich (1996) 78 F.3d 1060
Long pattern of abuse of M and Cs, coupled with finding that France would not adequately protect children from F, justified finding of _____ .
grave risk of harm exception
Blondin v. Dubois (2001) 238 F.3d 153
Testimony of children of witnessing abuse justified reversal of trial court denial of _____.
grave risk of harm exception
Simcox v. Simcox (2007) 511 F.3d 592
Court need not rely on ______ in determining whether there was grave risk of harm to children if returned to Germany based on evidence of M’s drunken and suicidal behavior.
emergency jurisdiction under UCCJEA
Marriage of Witherspoon (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 963
Court is not required to examine all possible ______ before denying a petition for return of the child.
ameliorative measures
Golan v. Saada (2022) 142 S.Ct. 1880
Court found ______ to children based on dad’s excessive drinking and acts of domestic violence.
grave risk of physical and psychological harm
Marriage of Emilie D.L.M. & Carlos C. (2021) 64 Cal.App.5th 876
The court erred in ordering repatriation by failing to properly consider mom’s defense that she fled because of ______.
domestic violence
Khan v. Fatima (2012) 680 F.3d 781
Court found no harm and that mom failed to ______ on her ability to care for child or conduct proceedings in Sweden.
demonstrate negative effect
Norinder v. Fuentes (2011) 657 F.3d 526
Hague convention permits consideration of child’s views concerning the essential question of _____.
return or retention under the age and maturity exception
Escobar v. Flores (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 737
Court of appeal found _____ for his or her views on return to be considered. It’s fact based.
8 is not necessarily too young
Da Silva v. Pitts (2007) 481 F.3d 1279
UCCJEA covers any proceeding in which legal custody, physical custody, or visitation is at issue including: _____
(1) dissolution,
(2) legal separation,
(3) neglect, abuse, and dependency actions,
(4) guardianship,
(5) paternity,
(6) termination of parental rights, and
(7) DVPA.
Fam. Code 3402
UCCJEA does not govern ______.
adoption proceedings
Fam. Code 3403
The parties must file a _____ declaration.
UCCJEA
Fam. Code 3429
Burden of proof is on the party _____.
asserting UCCJEA
In re Baby Boy M. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 588
The court retains jurisdiction during ____ of the proceeding.
the pendency
Marriage of Kreiss (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1082
Initial home state if: ______
- CA is the home state on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or within 6 months before the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from the state but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this state;
(2) another state does not have jurisdiction or declined to exercise jurisdiction on the grounds that CA appropriate forum AND
(A) significant connection or (B) substantial evidence is available in this state
(3) all courts having jurisdiction under (1) have declined to exercise jurisdiction b/c CA better forum
(4) No court of any other state would have jurisdiction
Fam. Code 3421(a)
The presence of a child in this state for the purpose of obtaining ______, is sufficient to meet initial jurisdiction.
gender-affirming health care or gender-affirming mental health care
Fam. Code 3421(d)
CA has jurisdiction when the child is absent if it is due _____.
to abduction
Marriage of Hopson (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 884
CA has jurisdiction if one party moves to another state but the remaining party ______.
files action within 6 months
Marriage of Torres (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 1367
For a child under 6 months, it would be where the child has _____.
lived since birth
Guardianship of Ariana K. (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 690
It was ______ where child from birth (under 6 months) had lived in Hawaii regardless of mother’s subjective intent to return to CA after birth of child.
error for court to find that CA had JDX
Ocegueda v. Perreira (2015) 232 Cal.App.4th 1079
Significant connection is _____ such as closer ties or where the evidence lies.
balancing of connections with both jurisdictions
Plas v. Superior Court (1984) 155 Cal.App.3d 1008
Just the fact the child ______ is not the test to determine jurisdiction.
lives in the jurisdiction
Marriage of Arnold & Cully (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 499
Where child had lived in MX, it was error for the court to find CA had JDX without the ______.
court contacting MX to determine JDX
In re Gino C. (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 959
Frequent trips to another state with the child ____ where mother moved to the other state less than 6 months before petition.
does not divest CA of JDX
Schneer v. Llaurado (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 1276
A party coming to CA from MX to give birth _____
does not give CA JDX. Court was required to contact MX to determine JDX after taking emergency JDX.
In re R.L. (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 125
The court can find that CA is home state while determining ______.
there is a more convenient forum
R.B. v. D.R. (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 108
CA may take JDX where _____ to exercise jurisdiction.
home state declines
In re E.R. (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 74
Where mom is transient and there is no home state, CA had jurisdiction where it had ______ is present in CA.
significant connections and substantial evidence
In re Ari S. (2021) 69 Cal.App.5th 1125
Physical presence of, or PJ over, a party or child is ______ to make a custody determination.
not necessary or sufficient
Fam. Code 3421(c)
UCCJEA meets the due process requirements for notice and opportunity to be heard in a child custody matter, even if _____.
no PJ over an out of state parent
Marriage of Leonard (1981) 122 Cal.App.3d 443
The court has exclusive continuing jurisdiction until: _____
(1) neither the child, nor the child and one parent have a significant connection with the state and substantial evidence is no longer available; or
(2) child, the child’s parents, and any person acting as a parent do not presently reside in the state.
Fam. Code 3422
Visitation in CA with one parent is _____.
sufficient to retain continuing jurisdiction
Graham v. Superior Court (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 1193
Continuing jurisdiction exists for juvenile court where initial decree was _____.
made in CA family court
In re E.W. (2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 1167
Continuing jurisdiction does not exist where parent and child move out of state and _____. Only applies to parents.
grandparents, requesting parenting time, remain in CA
A.M. v. Superior Court (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 343
A party _____ an out of state or international order.
may register
Fam. Code 3445
The court may grant relief under the laws of CA to ____ a registered child custody determination made by a court of another state.
enforce
Fam. Code 3446
A foreign country decree is treated as if it were made by a state in the US if: ____
(1) the decree is made in substantial conformity with jurisdictional standards under UCCJEA and
(2) it does not violate fundamental principles of human rights.
Fam. Code 3405
The court shall afford _____ to the order of another state.
full faith and credit
Fam. Code 3453
The court retains jurisdiction during pendency of proceedings to make child custody orders that seem _____.
necessary or proper
Fam. Code 3022
Child custody orders are ______ where they are properly noticed, and are conclusive as to all decided issues.
binding upon parties
Fam. Code 3406
Jurisdiction issues are ____ merit issues.
entitled to priority over
Fam. Code 3407
Notice to party outside of CA is required to be in line with _____. Notice is not required for the exercise of jurisdiction with respect to a person _____ to the jurisdiction of the court.
service requirements of that state
who submits
Fam. Code 3408
Court shall not exercise JDX if at commencement of CA proceeding, _______ where procedures are in line with CA’s UCCJEA UNLESS the proceeding in the other state is ______ because CA is more convenient.
another action is pending in another state
terminated or stayed
Fam. Code 3426 & 3427
Factors to consider for inconvenient forum include: ____
(1) DV;
(2) length child has resided outside the state;
(3) distance between courts;
(4) degree of financial hardships;
(5) agreement of parties to assume JDX;
(6) nature and location of evidence;
(7) ability of courts to resolve expeditiously; and
(8) familiarity of the court of each state with the facts and issues.
Fam. Code 3427(b)
India did not have jurisdiction because it was not in substantial _____, 9 days in India did not confer the home state, and mother and child had connection to CA at the time of filing.
conformity of UCCJEA
Marriage of Sareen (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 371
Where aunt had a guardianship case and the child ran away to CA, CA did not have jurisdiction because of the guardianship action absent _____.
evidence of abuse
In re Nelson B. (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 1121
Father’s long stay in Pakistan did not divest CA of JDX because he was there to fight Mother’s case there and attempt _____. There was no evidence he had “moved” to Pakistan.
to return the child to CA
Marriage of Nurie (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 478
Emergency jurisdiction (such as DV) only lasts _____ and until the original state can act.
as long as the emergency
Marriage of Fernandez‐Abin (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 1015
UCCJEA takes a strict first in time approach to jurisdiction, and the court erred in finding Belarus had jurisdiction where record establishes father did not _____.
have actual notice of the proceeding in Belarus
W.M. v. V.A. (2018) 30 Cal.App.5th 64
It was _______ even though Mexico was home state where CA attempted 2 emails and several calls to Mexico family court with no success and found this was tantamount to Mexico’s declination to exercise jurisdiction, and substantial evidence children had significant connections to CA.
proper for CA to take jurisdiction
In re A.C. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 661
Court _____ at any time if it determines that it is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum. The issue of inconvenient forum may be raised upon motion of a party, the court’s own motion, or request of another court.
may decline to exercise its jurisdiction
Fam. Code 3427
Court must allow parties to introduce evidence regarding: (1) If DV and which state could best _____, (2) The length of time the child has resided outside this state, (3) The distance between the court in this state and the court in the state that would assume jurisdiction, (4) The degree of financial hardship to the parties in litigating in one forum over the other, (5) Any agreement of the parties as to which state should assume jurisdiction, (6) The nature and location of the ______, (7) The ability of the court to issue expeditiously and the procedures necessary to present the evidence, (8) The _______ of each state with the facts and issues in the pending litigation.
protect the parties and the child
evidence, including testimony of the child
familiarity of the court
Fam. Code 3427(b)
Court erred by ruling on inconvenient forum without providing parties opportunity to _____.
present evidence on the issue
Brewer v. Carter (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1312
Court may not modify custody made by a court of another state unless CA _____ or (1) The court of the other state determines it no longer has continuing jurisdiction OR (b) parties and child ____.
has jurisdiction to make an initial determination under 3421
no longer live in that state
Fam. Code 3423
Both parties left initial state of TX. Where TX declined jurisdiction of continuing jurisdiction, and father’s state neither accepted nor declined, it was proper for CA to award _____.
emergency orders and retain jurisdiction pending further notice
Keisha W. v. Marvin M. (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 581
Registration of a decree does not ______.
confer modification jurisdiction
Marriage of Kent (2019) 35 Cal.App.5th 487
The court may issue orders concerning a child if there is an emergency such that orders are ______. If emergency orders are made when no prior court another court has home state jurisdiction, the emergency orders stay in effect until a case is filed in that home state jurisdiction. In that instance, the court shall specify the duration of its order and time allotted for party to seek order from the other court.
necessary to protect the child from imminent harm
Fam. Code 3424
Child traveled to CA from Mexico to receive necessary medical care. Juvenile court issued proceedings to keep child in CA for medical treatment. Court found that intensive medical care ______.
was not sufficient basis for emergency jurisdiction
In re A.C. (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 854
Where Nevada declined to find facility for abandoned children, it was proper for CA to _____.
take emergency jurisdiction to protect the children
In re Angel L. (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 1127
Where court found child was tortured and subject to extreme physical abuse, CA properly exercised emergency jurisdiction to protect the child AND home state ceded jurisdiction. CA’s failure to communicate with home state court was found to be _____.
harmless error
In re Cristian I. (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1088
Where child is detained when mother is arrested for smuggling heroin into the U.S., court _____ however, direction from appeal to limit jurisdiction to determine if Mexico wished to assume jurisdiction.
properly issued emergency jurisdiction
In re A.M. (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 593
Not _______ and to deny registration of Chinese order where it was not final due to a stay pending Husband’s appeal of it.
error for court to issue emergency jurisdiction
Marriage of Wang & Zhou (2021) 62 Cal.App.5th 1098
A superior court has jurisdiction regarding the custody and care of children within the meaning of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. Sec. 1101 et seq. and 8 C.F.R. Sec. 204.11), which includes, but is not limited to, the juvenile, probate, and family court divisions of the superior court. These courts have ____ the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services for classification as a special immigrant juvenile pursuant to Section 1101(a)(27)(J) of Title 8 of the United States Code.
jurisdiction to make the factual findings necessary to enable a child to petition
CCP 155(a)(1)
SIJ creates pathway for citizenship if ______.
substantial evidence supports finding
O.C. v. Superior Court (2019) 44 Cal.App.5th 76
SIJ law extends to children up to ___.
21
Guardianship of Saul H (2022) 13 Cal.5th 827