Chapters 4-6 Flashcards

1
Q

define materiality

A

having a substantial impact on a reasonable investor’s view, especially concerning long-term shareholder value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define fudiciary trust

A

the legal and ethical obligation of boards of directors to act in the best interest of shareholders.

board members must prioritize the welfare of the shareholders over their personal interests and ensure that corporate actions maximize the value for the shareholders.

This duty has evolved to include considering the long-term effects of sustainability on shareholder value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define the materiality matrix

A

a simple graphic that visually presents on one axis the importance of an issue to stakeholders and on the other axis its impact on the company’s business.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is a materiality matrix used for

A
  1. aligning sustainability strategy with corporate strategy
  2. identifiying/ prioritizing business opportunities
  3. improving dm by incorporating key sustainability criteria
  4. reporting relevant informtion concisely
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

business induces complexities (list 3)

A
  1. mixed up chameleon
  2. geography
  3. hodgepodge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

mixed up chameleon complexity

A

In industries like consultancies and banks, companies adapt their sustainability priorities to match those of their value chain partners—organizations they work closely with in the supply or service chain. This behavior is analogous to a chameleon changing colors to imitate different animals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

geography complexity

A

Global companies face challenges as definitions of crucial sustainability issues vary by region.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

hodgepodge complexity

A

Conglomerates with diverse businesses handle numerous potentially significant sustainability topics, making it challenging to focus efforts. With no central driving force, sustainability becomes decentralized, causing reporting and alignment difficulties that hinder transformation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

list two models to generate a materiality mix

A
  1. mendelow influences interest grid
  2. salience model
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

mendelow influences interest grid

A

classifying stakeholders according to their influence over your activities
four quadrants: influence, and interest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

salience model

A

rating the importance and salience of stakeholders based on three attributes: power (1), urgency (2), and legitimacy (3).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain the quadrants of the mendelow influence grid

A

Low Influence, High Interest (Keep Informed)

High Influence, Low Interest (Keep Satisfied)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Attributes of salience listed

A
  1. latent
  2. expectant
  3. definitive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

define latent (in salience model)

A

Latent: Possessing only one of the attributes (power, urgency, or legitimacy).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

define expectant (in salience model)

A

Expectant: Moderately salient with two attributes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

define definitive (in salience model)

A

Definitive: High salience with all three attributes.

17
Q

the salience process (5)

A
  1. Define the Long List of Sustainability Topics (from GRI or SASB)
  2. Rank the Topics and Create a Short List (15 issues)
  3. Rate the Business Impact of the Short List (based on risks and opportunities + cost savings, revenue growth, enhanced reputation, and risk reduction.)
  4. Construct a Concept Materiality Matrix
  5. Fine-Tune the Materiality Matrix, Obtain Senior Management Sign-Off, and Document the Process
18
Q

How can high-importance sustainability topics be aligned with a company’s must-win battles and enterprise risks?

A

Map sustainability topics to must-win battles and enterprise risks, identify gaps, and develop action plans for overcoming them.

19
Q

What is a potential pitfall associated with materiality matrices that are solely designed for reporting purposes?

A

They may be too distant from the business, failing to engage colleagues and external stakeholders effectively.

20
Q

What are the most impactful business-induced complexities when developing a materiality matrix?

A

Geographic scope, diversity of activities, and the company’s business model are described as the most impactful business-induced complexities.

21
Q

The vectoring approach to SDGs

A

strategically focusing efforts and resources on specific Sustainable Development Goals or their combinations, recognizing the interconnections between goals and aiming for integrated progress.

22
Q

how exactly to take a vectoring approach to SDGs?

A
  1. Concentrate on a select set of relevant materialities to drive targeted and impactful initiatives.
  2. Ensure synchronization with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to guide and measure the success of corporate strategies.
  3. Advocate for the comprehensive integration of these components to form a cohesive and effective vectoring approach.
23
Q

while embedding SDG, stake. (…)-(…)-(…) approach

A

target-measure-act approach

24
Q

trap to avoid about embedding SDGs 2

A

Avoid isolated approaches; prioritize collaboration and partnerships to maximize the impact of SDG initiatives.

Reject a paternalistic view of SDGs as distant challenges. Instead, tailor SDG programs locally for businesses operating on a smaller scale.

25
Q

what’s Active Ownership

A

Shareholders are using their rights to influence company ESG policies through voting and engagement.

26
Q

To assess companies, CADMOS follows a four-step process:

A

Step 1: They gather sustainability data from companies, focusing on nine important topics. They choose three topics for each company based on its characteristics.

Step 2: Porter’s Five Forces to understand how a company’s competitive advantage relates to its social responsibility.

Step 3: They assess companies on how well-prepared they are for social responsibility, the quality of their reports, and the maturity of their social impact strategies.

Step 4: They summarize their assessment, pointing out a company’s strengths, weaknesses, and areas where it needs to improve in terms of sustainability.

27
Q

what’s active engagement?

A

Active engagement refers to companies actively collaborating with institutional investors, particularly in the context of incorporating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations into investment decisions.

28
Q

some obstacles in the transition to active engagement

A

Identifying Important ESG Issues:
It’s tough for companies and investors to figure out which ESG issues really matter for valuation. Companies’ reports and ESG ratings often don’t easily fit into valuation models.

Quality of ESG Information:
    Investment firms want better ESG info. Without high-quality data, integrating ESG factors into valuation models becomes tricky.

Data Security Materiality:
    The Cambridge Analytica scandal shows that data security matters. Now, there's more attention on making sure data security is a crucial factor for investors.
29
Q

steps of the cadmos x2. (5)

A
  1. Assessment criteria expansion
  2. Data collection, and picking topics for each company based on their characteristics and industry.
  3. Company-specific analysis using 4 Forces Model- connecting how well a company was doing in terms of competition with how socially responsible they are.
  4. Bench-marking- how well companies were for ESG challenges using criteria like commitment and strategy.
  5. Summary compilation- they put together a summary of their assessment, pointing out where a company was strong.
30
Q

Active Engagement to Results:

A

Active Engagement and Results:
Simply engaging actively doesn’t ensure actual results in integrating ESG factors into investment decisions.

Transition Process:
    Moving from considering ESG to directly including ESG parameters in valuations takes time and effort.

Real-world Impact of ESG:
    The Cambridge Analytica scandal highlighted the consequences of neglecting ESG issues.

Importance for Long-Term Success:
    To secure long-term success and investor satisfaction, companies must seriously address ESG factors.
31
Q

how to deal with the increasing burden of non-financial reporting?

A
  1. Integrate sustainability key performance indicators (KPIs) into regular management structures.
  2. Focus on a specific set of sustainability issues for reporting reduces the overall effort.
32
Q

Reporting Trap

A

The increasing demand for non-financial reporting can lead to → reporting trap.

reporting trap divert resources from actual business improvement efforts and the company’s societal impact.

33
Q

How are stakeholders classified in the Mendelow influence-interest grid?

A

The Mendelow grid classifies stakeholders based on their influence over activities and their interest in them, prioritizing them into four action quadrants.

34
Q

What is the primary purpose of governance in the materiality analysis process?

A

to ensure accountability and transparency throughout the process.

35
Q

compare mendelow and salience model based on their mode of classification

A

The Mendelow model classifies stakeholders based on influence and interest, while the Salience model rates stakeholders on power, urgency, and legitimacy, providing a comprehensive classification method.

36
Q

How can companies embed the SDGs into their activities?

A

companies can integrate the SDGs by conducting a thorough analysis of their current sustainability program, comparing it with the full list of 17 SDGs, and identifying relevant targets. This process involves peer analysis, measurement systems, and the formulation of action plans aligned with the goals.

37
Q

compare hodge podge and mixed up chameleon

A

Hodgepodge is about the internal diversity of a conglomerate’s businesses, while Mixed-Up Chameleon is about adapting to the external diversity of value chain partners.