Chapters 18-20 Flashcards

1
Q

What does it mean if the results are statistically significant?

A

Means that the results would be surprising, but not impossible if the null hypothesis were true. But we really care about effect size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The relationship between the P value and size of the effect depends on…

A

sample size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Small effect can be significant with…

A

a large sample.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Relative risk

A

The ratio of the treated group to control group (larger means greater effect size)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

False Discovery Rate (FDR)

A

Given that the result is significant, the probability that the null hypothesis is actually true. This cannot be truly known.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The FDR probability cannot usually be determined because…

A

every probability calculation must be based on a model that can be expressed mathematically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

FDR=

A

Type I Errors/Total Decisions to Reject Null

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

However, our interpretation always involved at least an informal process of trying to estimate the FDR.

A

Examples 1, 2, and 3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Example 1 of informally estimating the FDR:

A

P value is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Example 2 of informally estimating the FDR:

A

P value is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Example 3 of informally estimating the FDR:

A

P value is P value is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What if you somehow know the probability that the null hypothesis is false?

A

Such knowledge would be an example of a prior probability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Perhaps a prior probability could be based on…

A

your previous experiences (e.g. 50% of people brought to trial int he past really were criminals)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Power

A

The power of a statistical test is the probability that it correctly rejects the null hypothesis when the null is false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Power can be calculated if you know:

A

1) sample size 2) standard deviation 3) size of effect of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Power=

A

Decisions to reject null/# times null is false

17
Q

FDR=

A

type I errors/total # decisions to reject null

18
Q

The Bayesian approach to FDR

A
Can have a big impact on interpretation!
• Example 1: You have
a drug developer
who has a track
record of 80%.
• Example 2: You have
experience with
traditional herbal
remedies producing
desired effect level
10% of the time.
19
Q

The Bayesian Approach to FDR (2)

A
Example 1:
• FDR =
• Example 2:
• FDR =
Effect of Prior Probability (0.10) on Interpretation
• In drug trials with Effect of Prior Probability (0.80) on Interpretation
the same level of
statistical power,
• Example 1:
• FDR = 10/650 = 0.15
• Example 2:
• FDR = 45/125 = 0.36
20
Q

FDR:

A

proportion of significant results that are really type I errors

21
Q

The Bayesian Approach to FDR is…

A

no more accurate than your prior probabilities

22
Q

Not statistically significant means…

A

only that the P value is larger than the present threshold. Does not prove that the null hypothesis is true.

23
Q

Keep in mind, the relationship between the P value and

size of the effect depends on sample size

A

Large effect can be nonsignificant with a small sample.

24
Q

CI helps put the data in perspective

A
- Testing whether the
amount of epinephrine
receptors on cells is
different in people with
high blood pressure.
- Used platelets as a
convenient ‘cell’ type
to measure.
- Means were similar.
- P value = 0.81
If you stop at this point and publish only these
results, you might imply that the null is true.
25
Example 1: - Means were similar. - P value = 0.81
``` - The observed means only differ by +6. - Out of total mean of 260. - But 95% CI for the difference is -45 to +57. - Approximately ±20%. - Would it matter if the true difference is actually 20%? -You need to decide whether this level of uncertainty matters in the scientific/medical context ```
26
Example 2:
``` A large study tests the impacts of sonograms. -They are expensive but common. Two treatments: 1) 2 routine sonograms 2) 0 unless physician saw a special need Observations: -count adverse health outcomes for fetus. Results pretty similar (P=0.86) with slightly higher adverse outcomes when sonograms used more often. ```
27
``` Outcomes similar: - P value = 0.86 - Null: relative risk = 1.0 - 95% CI for relative risk: - 0.88 to 1.17 - So it is possible that sonograms reduce risk by 12% or raise risk by 17%. - But we definitely can’t rule out the null hypothesis. ```
So are they useful? What if the null was true (no | impact on safety)? Might they still be ‘useful’?
28
How to Get Narrower CIs
``` . • Unless you can change the SD (not usually), then sample size must be increased. • Rule of thumb: - Increase sample size by factor of 4 to decrease CI by factor of 2. ```
29
Recall: the width of the CI is inversely proportional
to | the square root of the sample size.
30
If you find that the CI contains some unacceptable uncertainty, then you need to
run a new study with greater | sample size to narrow the CI .
31
The power of a | statistical test is
``` the probability that it correctly rejects the null hypothesis when the null is false. ```
32
`As power increases, the probability of | Type II errors
decreases
33
Given the 1) sample size, 2) standard deviation, and | 3) size of effect, power is
the fraction of experiments | in which you would expect to find a significant result.
34
• In practice, power | is the
``` fraction of experiments in which you would expect to find a statistically significant result. ```
35
Which means that power can never be lower than α.
As effect size decreases to zero, power decreases to α. When effect size = 0, then null is true, and the only way to get a significant result is by chance (sampling error).