Chapter Seven Flashcards
Strict liability
liability regardless of fault
Elements of strict liability
- The product was already defective
- The defendant normally sells this product
- in a defective state product is dangerous
- harm caused
- defective condition is cause of harm
- product has not been altered or changed
product liability
those who lease or sell goods can be held liable for physical harm or damage caused by goods
Due care is used when:
designing the product
manufacturing
safety labels/ warning
privity of contract
relationship that exists between promisor and promisee of a contract
case in fact
“but for” the defendant’s action, the injury would not have occurred
misrepresentation
made knowingly or with reckless disregard
public policy assumptions
- Consumers should be protected against unsafe products
- manufacturers and distributors should not escape liability because they were not in privity of contract
- manufacturers and distributers can bear the costs of injuries
unreasonably dangerous product
a defective product to the point of threatening a consumer’s health and safety
Types of torts
manufacturing - from the moment it left the factory, failure for inspection
design - product not designed correctly, unreasonable dangerous
to prove - alternative design clause
inadequate warning - no labels or safety warnings
market share liability
liability is shared among all firms that manufactured and distributed a particular product for a certain amount of time
Assumption of risk
- plaintiff knew and appreciated the risk
- plaintiff voluntarily assumed risk
product misuse
plaintiff used product in a manor not intended