chapter 9 persuasion & helping Flashcards

1
Q

persuasion

A

active attempt to change another person’s attitudes by means of direct message of communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

central route to persuasion

A

through strength of arguments

experiment:
IV: strength of arguments
DV: attitude change in direction of arguments
results: strong arguments resulted in greater attitude change, weaker arguments tend to have a counter-intuitive effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

peripheral route to persuasion

A

through peripheral cues - features of the communication that trigger acceptance without much thinking

experiment:
goal–>cut in line to use copier
IV: size of request (5 pg vs 20 pg) & form of request (nicely asking, with reason, without reason)
DV: % agreeing to let cut in line
result:
-equally high % agree with/without reason if its 5 pg, least % agree when nicely asked 5 pg
-all quite low % agreeing with 20 pg
–>shows that we attend to form of request, not substance of req

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what variables affect central-route processing?

A
  1. involvement (motivation): personal involvement increases central-route processing
  2. need for cognition (motivation): ppl with higher need for cognition are inclined to scrutinise the content & arguments present in the message, evaluate the evidence, & think critically about the message’s merits
  3. forewarning (motivation to counter argue): when individuals are forwarded that they will encounter a persuasive message, they become more motivated to process the message critically
  4. age (motivation & ability): younger ind (18-25) more persuadable (less inclined to engage in central route processing & rely more on peripheral cues)
  5. IQ (ability): higher IQ ppl hv greater cognitive capacity, can enhance their ability to engage in central route processing
  6. distraction (ability): more likely to be persuaded when u are distracted (less likely to focus, attention is scattered, difficult to engage in deep thinking & evaluation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what variables affect peripheral cues?

A

features of the message source:
1. credibility/expertise
2. likeability (attractiveness/fame/similarity)

features of the message:
1. numbers of the messages/arguments e.g. 10 reasons to…
2. emotion it evokes (fear + information is the most effective)

features of the audience:
1. mood (make ppl happy, or know mood)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

attitude

A

person’s favourable/unfavourable evaluation of target object or idea

relatively enduring organisation of beliefs, feelings & behavioural tendencies towards socially significant objects, groups, events, or symbols

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

helping (evolutionary psych)

A

kin selection in action
prosocial roots
helpful babies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

social exchange theory

A

rewards of helping others:
1. increase likelihood of return help (reciprocity)
2. decrease levels of personal distress
3. gain social approval from others - “reputation”

cost of helping others:
1. put self in danger
2. consumes time
3. requires energy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why do people help?

A

kin selection
calculated vs uncalculated prosocialty
reciprocity
cultural norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

process of helping

A
  1. notice the event
    -time pressure can conflict with our good intentions of helping
  2. interpret as emergency (vs situational ambiguity)
    -informational influence: we watch the behaviour of others to help us define ambiguous situations
    pluralistic ignorance: amid passive bystanders, each person assumes other are not acting because they see the situation as non-emergency
  3. assume responsibility (vs diffusion of responsibility)
    -the more ppl in the group, the less likely each participant is to respond & the longer it takes each ind to respond
  4. know how to help
  5. decide to implement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how to increase helping

A
  1. increase value of education
  2. victims must clearly signal emergency to others–>eliminate effect of pluralistic ignorance
  3. victims must request help directly from one specific ind.–>eliminate diffusion of responsibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly