Chapter 9: Performance Evaluations Flashcards
What are the general properties of quantitive performance measures?
- risk profile
- distortion
- potential for manipulation
- scope
- match to job design
What is Risk Profile? Implication? Remedy?
Definition:
how much performance measure is influenced by factors outside the employee’s control
Implication:
- if a measure has a high-risk profile, it leads to lower motivation and job dissatisfaction
remedy:
- Risk-sharing mechanisms
What is Distortion? Implication?
Definition:
performance measure captures only desired outcomes; employees only focus on measured aspects at the expense of the unmeasured but equally important objectives
Implication:
may lead to suboptimal decisions, such as prioritizing short-term gains over long-term sustainability
What is the Potential of Manipulation? Implication?
Definition:
employees can game or distort the measure without actually improving real performance
Implication:
- leads to unethical behavior, fraud, or efforts prioritizing appearances over actual performance improvements
What is Scope? Implications?
Definition:
the degree to which the measure captures all aspects of an employee’s impact on organizational goals
Implications:
narrow-scope measures have less risk, high distortion, and high manipulation
broad measures have more risk, low distortion, and low manipulation
What is Match to Job Design? Implication?
Definition:
refers to how well the performance measure aligns with the employee’s responsibilities and control within their role
Implication:
properly matching measures to job design enhances fairness and motivates employees to focus on controllable and impactful tasks
What are the typical problems of Subjective Evaluation?
- inflation & compression ratings
- reluctance for negative feedback
- favoritism, “yes men,” pressure on evaluator
- low trust in the evaluator
Why do we use Subjective Evaluation?
Metrics are imperfect so this measure:
- reduce uncontrollable risk, distortion, & manipulation
- improve incentives for risk-taking
- improve decision making
- give the incentive system flexibility
- expand communication between manager & employee
- be a form of training
How to avoid typical problems of Subjective Evaluation?
- multiple evaluators may reduce bias & favoritism
- provide supervisors with performance data, training in evaluation, and structured forms to give some guidance
- provide oversight & allow employees to challenge evaluations
- the culture of constructive feedback giving & receiving
- leadership must make careful & fair evaluation a high priority
What are the steps involved with the Performance Evaluation design?
- Choosing the appropriate measure
- Evaluate the measure
- Adjust incentive strength based on measure flaws
- Incorporate subjective evaluation or discretionary bonuses
- Review and refine
What are questions to ask when evaluating a performance measure?
- How much of the measure is affected by risk?
- Is risk controllable to a great extent?
- How will it distort the employee’s behavior (it will)?
- How much is the room for manipulation?