Chapter 9- Generalization, Discrimination, And Stimulus Control Flashcards
What is discrimination? Why is discrimination a valuable ability?
The tendency to behave differently in different situations
Valuable because learning would be a handicap if what was learned carried over to situations where it was inappropriate. Sometimes it is best if behaviour learned in one situation does not carry over to very different situations
The tendency for a learned behaviour to occur in the presence of stimuli that were not present during training
Generalization
Provide and recognize examples of generalization as it occurs in Pavlovian conditioning and operant conditioning
Pavlovian conditioning: a dog may learn to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork vibrating at 1000 cps. After this training, the dog may then be found to salivate to the sound of a tuning fork vibrating at, say, 950 cps to 1100 cps, even though it was never exposed to these stimuli
Operant conditioning: Thorndike observed that a cat that has learned to escape from one box by clawing and is then put into another box has a greater tendency to claw at things then it instinctively had at the start
How did Watson and Rayner demonstrate generalization of Pavlovian conditioning in their work with little Albert?
After little Albert learned to fear a white rat, he became fearful of other previously neutral stimuli. Specifically, other white, for he objects that were similar to the white rat
How can generalization be increased?
By providing training in a wide variety of settings
Describe the results of Eisenberger and his colleagues in inducing the generalization of desirable behavioural tendencies.
Found that rewarding a high level of effort on one task increases the level of effort on other tasks, a phenomenon they called learned industriousness. This means that trying hard may, if reinforced in one situation, generalize to another
When rewarding a high level of effort on one task increases the level of effort on other tasks
Learned industriousness
Example: a person who is praised for working really hard at moving firewood, will work equally as hard at cutting it later
Provide and recognize original examples of cases in which generalization is not helpful. Describe Dweck and Repucci’s study illustrating this aspect of generalization
Sometimes a behaviour that is useful in one situation generalizes to situations in which it is not appropriate.
Example: Thorndike noticed that a cat that had learned to escape from a box by pulling on a loop would later pull at the same spot, even though the loop had been removed.
A college student who is off-colour jokes get big laughs in the dormitory me later find that the same jokes are not appreciated at the family dinner table
Dweck Repucci: teachers first gave students unsolvable problems. Later these teachers gave the students problems that could be solved, but the students failed to solve them. Perhaps the tendency to give up generalize from the first situation to the second, because when a different teacher gave the students a solvable problems, they were successful
Can also make a problem behaviours more troublesome then they would if they did not generalize: if punching a large inflated doll is reinforced, children later tend to be more aggressive when interacting with their peers
Any graphic representation of generalization data. When generalization results are plotted on a curve, they yield a figure called the:
Generalization gradient
Describe Gottman’s and Kallush’s study of stimulus generalization in pigeons
Birds learned to pack a disc of a particular colour and later had the opportunity to pack discs of various colors, including the colour used in training. Pigeons packed the disc most frequently when it was the colour used during training, but they also packed the disc when it was other colours. The more closely the disc resembled the training desk, the more often the birds pecked it. If a disk or almost the same colour as the training desk, the birds pecked it at almost as much as if it were the training desk and if it were a very different color, they seldom touched it
Generalization based on an abstract, as opposed to a physical, property of a stimulus
Semantic generalization
Describe Razran’s study of the semantic generalization of Pavlovian conditioning
Had people learn to salivate at the sight of words and then showed them words that were either homophones, words with similar sounds but different meanings, or synonyms of the words in training. The participants salivated in response to the homophones, however, they salivated even more in response to the synonyms. Although there was some generalization based on the sounds of words, there was even more generalization based on word meanings
Provide an original example of racial or nationality-based prejudice that is due to semantic generalization.
Textbook example: during World War II, the word Japanese was often paired with unpleasant words which probably elicited negative emotional reactions in other people. Thousands of Japanese people were imprisoned in concentration camps and their property confiscated, although they’re only crime was that they resembled the enemy
Original example: just recently, Syrian refugees were targeted as well as other people of Arab descent already living in the country because of the terrorist attacks around the world
Can generalization of the effects of extinction and punishment occur?
Yes, behaviour produced by extinction and punishment also spread beyond the training situation
Example: when pressing a horizontal levers for food was put on extinction with rats, this reduced the rats tendency to press a new vertical lever
Describe Koenig and Slivko’s study of inhibitory stimulus generalization
Trained pigeons to peck discs of various colours then began providing brief electrical shock on some occasions reinforcing certain colours but punishing a particular color. The tendency to peck the disc when it was that colour declined, but so did the tendency to pack when the disc was other colors, especially those that were similar to the punished colour
A process in which a response reinforced in one stimulus situation becomes apt to occur in a different, though similar, stimulus situation
Excitatory stimulus generalization
A process in which a response extinguished in one stimulus situation becomes less apt to occur in a different, though similar, stimulus situation
Inhibitory stimulus generalization
The tendency for a behaviour to occur in the presence of certain stimuli, but not in their absence
Discrimination
Example: the tendency to respond in the presence of a red light, but not in other situations, such as the presence of a blue or green light
The organism behaves differently in different situations
How are discrimination and generalization inversely related?
The more discrimination, the less generalization. Generalization gradients therefore also reflect the degree of discrimination. A relatively flat gradient indicates little or no discrimination; a steep gradient indicates considerable discrimination
Any procedure for establishing A discrimination
Discrimination training
In this type of discrimination training, training consists of presenting one stimulus, the CS+, with the US and presenting another stimulus, the CS-, without the US
Pavlovian discrimination training
Sample: we might put food into a dogs mouth each time a buzzer sounds and give the dog nothing when a bell rings. The dog will salivate at the sound of the buzzer, the CS+, but not at the sound of the bell, the CS-. The dog discriminate between the buzzer and the bell
In this type of discrimination training, training normally consists of reinforcing a behaviour when it occurs in the presence of one stimulus, the S+ or Sd, but not when it occurs in the presence of another stimulus, the S- or Sdelta,
Operant discrimination training
Example: arrange an experimental chamber so that a rat receives food each time it presses a lever, but only if the lamp is on. The result will be that when the lamp is on, S+, The rat presses the lever, and when the lab is off, S-, it does not press. The rat discriminates between the light on situation and the light off situation
In operant discrimination training, any stimulus that signals either that a behaviour will be reinforced (S+ or Sd) or will not be reinforced (S- or Sdelta)
Discriminative stimuli
Stimuli that are associated with different consequences for behaviour
A discrimination training procedure in which the S+ and S- are presented one after the other in random sequence
The S+ and S- alternate, usually randomly. When the S+ appears, the behaviour is reinforced; when the S- appears, the behaviour is on extinction
Successive discrimination training
Example: A rat may be placed in an experimental chamber with two lightbulbs, one red and one green, over a lever. Whenever the red light is on, lever pressing produces food; whenever the green light is on, lever pressing has no effect
A discrimination training procedure in which the S+ and S- are presented at the same time
Simultaneous discrimination training
Example: placing a rat in a chamber in which the red and green lights are on, with each light placed above its own lever. Pressing the lever under the red light results in food; pressing the lever under the green light does not
A discrimination training procedure in which the task is to select from two or more comparison stimuli the one that matches a sample
The comparison stimuli include the S+ – The stimulus that matches the sample — and one or more S-s.
Matching to sample
Example: a sample disk on one wall of an experimental chamber may be illuminated by either a red or a green light. On some trials the disc will be red and others will be green. After a short time the sample desk goes dark, and two comparison discs, one red and one green, are illuminated. The S+ is the disc of the same colour as the sample. If a pigeon pecks the comparison disc that matches the sample, it receives food; if it text the other disk, it receives nothing. To obtain reinforcement, the bird must successfully discriminate between the disk that matches the sample and the one that does not
A variation of matching to sample in which reinforcement is available for selecting the comparison stimulus that is different from the sample
Mismatching or oddity matching
Example: a bird is required to peck a disk that is different from the sample
A form of discrimination training in which the S- is introduced in very weak form and gradually strengthened. The usual result is that discrimination is achieved with few or no errors
Errorless discrimination training
Example: in training a pigeon to discriminate between a red disk (S+) and a green disk (S-), Terrace presented the red desk at full strength for three minutes at a time and instead of presenting a green disc for three minutes, he presented an unlit disk for 5 seconds. Pigeons are less likely to pack a dark disc then a bright one, and the shorter the time the disc is available, the less likely they are to pick it. The result was that the S- was seldom pecked. Gradually he increased the duration and strength of the S- while reinforcing pecking at the S+. Finally he was able to present the green disk without the bird pecking it