Chapter 9: Credit market failure Flashcards
Different interest rate for borrowers and lenders
- Credit markets are not perfect
- Charge a higher interest rate to borrowers (Red line)
- Same endowment point
- Lender has a lower interest rate
Kinked budget constraint
Optimal point for a lender
Endowment can happen in some cases
Optimal point for a borrower
Endowment can happen in some cases
Interest rate for borrowers increase
Becomes steeper and moves to the left
Increasing interest rate reduces the present value and lifetime wealth
Why were interest rates increased for borrowers?
Recieve their funds back
What was the impact of the increasing interest rate?
Made things worse and there was an increase in default
Why does the Ricardian equivalnce not hold
- Movement of endowment point
- Points on the red line are available therefore tehy choose a new borrowing point
- Previosuly, in Ricardian, the consumer would save all the tax cut and consumption would remain unaffected, as the savings would be deciated towards the future tax increase.
- Greater incentive to take out loan and become a borrower
Limited commitment and collateral
Lenders recieve assets as collateral. Collateral which is promised is taken away
Loan repayment -s(1+r) < (Collateral) pH
Collateral and credit markets simple diagram
- Presence of collateral means a budget constraint is kinked
- Maximum consumption in the first period is private disposable income
- Borrower optimal position is to consume all the disposable income in the current period
- Collateral is something that takes long to sell therefore, it can only be sold in the future
- pH is the amount that can be added to the lifetime wealth when sold in the future, and the borrower is not going to be lent more, as this is the collateral
- Higher interest rate for lenders, so that banks are compensates the cost of making loans
Budget constraint with collateral
Collateral constraint shows the maximum consumption in the current period
If the consumer was to borrow at the kink, then he or she would have a binding collateral constraint, borrowing up to the full amount that lenders will permit, and consuming future disposable income in the future period, with c ′ = y ′ - t ′ .
The price of houses decreasing on the collateral constraint
- Decrease in housing prices
- Maximum amount that can be loaned decreases
- A constrained consumer cannot smooth the effects of the decrease in his or her wealth. Lower current consumption
Random walk view of consumption
- No uncertainity about the future but in real life this is not true
- Basing analysis on expected changes in income
- Expected value of future income and therefore base decisions today on that
Consumption vs expenditure
Retirement is confusing
- People consume less
- Calories remain the same but people have time to cook at home, which is much cheaper
Pre-cautionary savings