Chapter 9 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Describe Wilhelm Wundt’s experiment

A

Wilhelm Wundt’s Experiment (1862): Wundt conducted an experiment using a specialized apparatus, leading him to believe in the possibility of a fully- fledged discipline of psychology.

o Apparatus Used: Featured a pendulum, a scale, and a bell.
o Key Finding: It took roughly 1/10 of a second to shift attention between the sound of the bell and the pendulum’s position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What were the implications of this experiment?

A

Central Mental Process Measurement: Wundt realized he was measuring the speed of a central mental process, marking a significant moment in experimental psychology.

Selective Attention and Voluntary Control: The experiment highlighted the speed of selective attention and introduced the concept of a central voluntary control process.

Distinction in Psychological Actions: Wundt emphasized the difference between voluntary and involuntary actions in his psychological framework.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were Wundt’s theoretical developments?

A

Contributions to the Theory of Sense Perception (1862a): Wundt advocated for a new field of experimental psychology focused on human consciousness.

Principles of Physiological Psychology (1874/1904): A seminal work where Wundt aimed to establish experimental psychology.

o Clarification of ‘Physiological’: In Wundt’s context, ‘physiological’ paralleled ‘experimental’, differing from today’s association with biological correlates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe Wundt’s school’s achievements

A

o Global Impact: By 1890, students globally were drawn to Leipzig to train under Wundt.

o Prolific Research Output: A significant volume of research emerged from Wundt’s laboratory, inspiring the establishment of similar labs worldwide, including in the U.S.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a school?

A

A school is a collective of individuals with shared assumptions, working on common problems and methods, akin to Kuhn’s concept of a paradigm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe Wundt’s thought meter apparatus

A

Design and Function: The apparatus included a swinging pendulum, a calibrated scale, and a bell.

Observation: When the bell sounded, the pendulum was never at the anticipated positions (d or b) but always some distance away.

Conclusion: This discrepancy, about 1/10 of a second, led to the understanding that one could not simultaneously attend to both the pendulum’s position and the bell sound.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe voluntarism’s ideas and influences

A

Empirical and Rationalistic Blend: Wundt’s focus combined empirical methods with the German rationalistic tradition to understand consciousness.

Influences from Philosophers:

o Herbart and Kant: Wundt acknowledged a significant intellectual
debt to these philosophers.

o Leibniz’s Impact: Wundt felt a special affinity with Leibniz, as
evident from numerous references in his theoretical works.
Opposition to Materialism and Empiricism

Against Materialism: Wundt argued that materialistic psychology contradicted the very fact of consciousness, which couldn’t be derived from physical properties of matter.

Critique of Empiricism: He viewed empiricism as lacking in central volitional processes, which impart unique forms, qualities, or values beyond external stimulation or elemental events.
Pursuit of Understanding Consciousness

Goal: To comprehend not just the experience of consciousness but also the mental laws governing its dynamics.

Central Concept - Will:

o Will in Attention and Volition: Will, as reflected in attention and volition, was crucial for understanding major psychological problems.

o Human Decision in Perception: Wundt believed humans could decide what to attend to and thus perceive.

o Motivation in Behavior and Attention: He posited that behavior and selective attention are often purposeful and motivated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe voluntarism’s tenets and how is it distinct from structuralism?

A

Definition and Focus: Voluntarism, named for its emphasis on will, choice, and purpose, was the first school of psychology, preceding structuralism.

Contrast with Structuralism: Structuralism, often mistakenly cited as the first school, was actually the approach of Edward Titchener, a student of Wundt, in the United States.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Wundt contribute to psych?

A

o Contributions to the Theory of Sense Perception (1862a): Laid the foundation for his lifelong psychological plan.

o Lectures on Human and Animal Psychology (1863): Explored both experimental psychology and naturalistic observation or historical analysis for higher mental processes.

Areas of Study: Included aesthetics, religious feelings, moral judgments, societal development, comparative religion, language, and will.

Völkerpsychologie: His monumental work spanning 10 volumes, encapsulating many themes from his earlier ‘Lectures’.

Establishment of Laboratory (1876): Gained the required space a year later, leading to teaching experimental psychology.

First Dedicated Psychology Laboratory (1879): His laboratory, termed the Institute for Experimental Psychology, marked the founding of the first lab exclusively for psychological research.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who did Wundt disagree with?

A

Disagreements with Predecessors:

o Galileo, Comte, and Kant: Challenged their view that psychology could never be a science.

o Herbart: Disputed Herbart’s belief that psychology could be mathematical but not experimental.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe experimental psychology’s scope

A

Experimental Psychology’s Scope: Asserted that psychology had indeed become an experimental science, but with limitations.

o Basic Mental Processes: Experimentation was suitable for studying fundamental mental processes.

o Higher Mental Events: Deemed experimentation unsuitable for studying complex mental events, socio-cultural, and historical matters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe Wundt’s methods

A

Experimental and Naturalistic Methods:

o For Basic Processes: Utilized experimental methods.

o For Complex Phenomena: Advocated for naturalistic observation.

Understanding Simple Before Complex: Emphasized the necessity of grasping simpler conscious processes to comprehend more complex ones.

o Foundational Rule in Psychology: Stressed that understanding simple phenomena is a prerequisite for understanding complex phenomena.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe Wundt’s goals for psych

A

Dual Objective: Aimed to understand both simple and complex psychological phenomena.

o Use of Experimentation: Appropriate for studying simpler aspects of the mind.

o Beyond Experimentation: For complex phenomena, alternative methods like naturalistic observation were essential.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe Wundt’s Approach to Mediate and Immediate Experience in Psychology

A

All Sciences Based on Experience: Wundt emphasized that all sciences, including psychology, are grounded in experience.

Type of Experience in Psychology: Differentiated between ‘mediate’ and ‘immediate’ experience as the basis for psychology.

Mediate vs. Immediate Experience

Mediate Experience:

o Used in Other Sciences: Examples include physics, where experience is mediated through devices like spectrometers or sound spectrographs.

o Characteristics: Involves data recorded and analyzed via instruments, leading to an indirect understanding of the physical world.

Immediate Experience:
o Central to Experimental Psychology: Focuses on direct human consciousness as it occurs, without mediation by devices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the goals of experimental psychology?

A
  1. Discover Basic Mental Elements: Identify the fundamental components of thought.
  2. Understand Mental Combinations: Determine laws governing the combination of these elements into complex mental experiences.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe Wundt’s use of introspection

A

Methodological Diversity: Utilized various methods, including introspection, to study basic mental processes.

Experimental vs. Pure Introspection:

o Pure Introspection: Earlier, less structured self-observation used by philosophers.

o Experimental Introspection: Wundt’s scientifically rigorous approach, employing laboratory instruments for precise internal perception, akin to external perception.

Implementation in Experiments:

o Simplification: Often required only “yes” or “no” responses or pressing a telegraph key.

o Comparison with Physiology and Psychophysics: Similar to methods used by Helmholtz and others for studying sensations and thresholds.

Critique of Philosophical Introspection: Wundt was critical of less objective, philosophical uses of introspection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How did Wundt contribute to sensory studies?

A

Replication of Physiological and Psychophysical Work: Conducted extensive studies on audition, vision, and sensory thresholds, building upon existing physiological and psychophysical research.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Describe Wundt’s sensations

A
  1. Definition: Occur when a sense organ is stimulated, and the impulse reaches the brain.
  2. Characteristics: Can be described in terms of modality (e.g., visual, auditory) and intensity.
  3. Within Modality: Further analysis of qualities such as hue and saturation for visual sensations, pitch and timbre for auditory sensations, and various taste characteristics.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe how Wundt viewed feelings

A
  1. Association with Sensations: Accompany all sensations.
  2. Tridimensional Theory of Feeling: Feelings can be described along three dimensions: pleasantness-unpleasantness, excitement-calm, and strain- relaxation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What was perception, according to Wundt?

A

A passive process influenced by physical stimulation, anatomical makeup, and past experiences. It involves experiencing many elements simultaneously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is apperception, according to Wundt?

A

Active and voluntary attention to a part of the perceptual field. It’s under individual control and integral to Wundt’s concept of voluntarism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Describe creative synthesis

A

o Critique of “Mental Chemistry”: Wundt opposed John Stuart Mill’s idea of passive idea synthesis.

o Active Role of Attention: Emphasized the active arrangement and rearrangement of elements by the individual’s will, leading to new, never- before-experienced arrangements.

o Unique to Psychology: Distinguished psychology from physical sciences, where phenomena like color are created by the individual’s cortex.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How did Wundt view the mind?

A

Contrary to Static Mind View: Wundt saw the mind as active, creative, dynamic, and volitional rather than just searching for cognitive and emotional elements.

Apperception in Mental Functioning: Essential for ordinary mental processes; loss of apperceptive ability could lead to disorganized thoughts, as in schizophrenia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How did Wundt influence theories of mental illness?

A

Expansion by Emil Kraepelin: Wundt’s student Kraepelin expanded on the idea that schizophrenia could be a breakdown of attentional processes, citing dysfunctions in the “central control process.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Describe mental chronometry in Wundt’s work

A

Wundt’s Associationism: Maintained a close link to traditional associationism in explaining the combination of sensations into perceptions.

Reaction Time in Psychological Study: In “Principles of Physiological Psychology,” Wundt posited that reaction time could complement introspection for studying the mind’s elemental contents and activities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Describe Donder’s chronometry

A

Reaction Time Experiments: Donders, a Dutch physiologist, designed experiments to measure the time for mental acts using reaction times.

Experiment Design: Involved varying stimuli and responses to calculate the time required for mental discrimination and choice-making.

o Example: Subjects were presented with multiple stimuli but responded only to a designated one, allowing measurement of discrimination time.
The arrangement described for Donders’ experiment on reaction time can be represented as follows:

Stimuli Presented: A, B, C, D, E

Designated Response: Only respond to stimulus C
o In the context of the experiment, this setup required participants to discriminate among the stimuli (A, B, C, D, E) before responding. They were instructed to respond only when the specific stimulus (C in this case) was presented. The reaction time measured in this scenario would include the time taken not only to perceive the stimulus but also to identify it as the designated one (C) and then respond accordingly (marked as ‘c’). This method allowed Donders to calculate the time required for the mental act of discrimination by comparing it with simpler reaction times.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

How did Wundt apply Donder’s methods

A

Adoption and Expansion: Wundt enthusiastically applied Donders’ methods,
aiming for a mental chronometry, or precise measurement of time for various mental
acts.

Contribution to Psychological Research: Early work in Wundt’s lab involved these reaction-time studies, marking a significant step in experimental psychology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Describe why Wundt eventually abandoned mental chronometry

A

Variability in Reaction Times: Wundt, like Helmholtz, noted substantial variability in reaction times across studies, subjects, and conditions.

Complex Variables: The influence of sensory modalities, stimulus intensity, discrimination tasks, and practice led to a lack of consistent psychological “constants.”

Initial Decline in Use: These methods were largely set aside after Wundt, due to their complexities and inconsistencies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

In which field did mental chronometry make a comeback?

A

Cognitive psych

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

How did mental chronometry return?

A

Rediscovery in the 1960s: With the emergence of cognitive psychology, reaction-time procedures gained renewed popularity.

Continued Relevance: These methods remain widely used in the study of cognitive processes even today.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Describe Wundt’s Perspective on Psychological vs. Physical Causation

A

Creative Synthesis: Humans can willfully arrange thought elements in numerous configurations.

Unpredictability of Intentions: Intentions, being willfully created, elude prediction and understanding through physical causation.

o Example: Human actions like greeting a friend or writing a poem can’t be fully explained by mechanical or physiological laws but require understanding of intentions and goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Describe the principle of Heterogony of Ends

A

Unintended Consequences: Goal-directed activities often lead to unexpected results, altering motivational patterns.

o New Motives Arising: Unplanned influences from an action can become new motives, complicating or changing the original act of volition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Describe principle of contrasts

A

Intensification by Opposition: Opposite experiences amplify each other,

e.g., sweetness feels intensified after sourness; pleasure is heightened following pain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Describe the principle towards the development of opposites

A

Prolonged exposure to one type of
experience increases the tendency to seek its opposite.

o Individual and Historical Applications: This principle is applicable both in individual experiences and in historical trends, such as the shift from rationalism in the Enlightenment to the emphasis on emotions in Romanticism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Describe Wundt’s mental laws

A

Characteristics: Unconscious, complex, and not directly knowable through introspection or experimentation.

2.Lawfulness of Products: Despite their complexity, these laws produce predictable outcomes.

Role of the Psychologist: Analogous to a historian, capable of deducing the laws of
mental activity only after the fact, inferring what must have happened based on events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Describe Wundt’s historical approach to studying higher mental functions

A

Investigation Method: Used historical analysis and naturalistic observation for studying higher mental processes.

Application in Völkerpsychologie: This approach was central to his research in the latter part of his career.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Describe Volkerpsychologie

A

Focus on Cultural Products: Examined human culture through religion, social customs, myths, history, language, morals, art, and law.

Research Span: Dedicated the last 20 years of his life to this study, culminating in a 10-volume work.

Modern Relevance: His findings, particularly in language and social interaction, resonate with contemporary understandings.

Three-Stage Communication Process:
1.Speaker’s Apperception: Apperceives their general impression or idea.

2.Expression: Chooses words and sentences to convey the impression.

  1. Listener’s Apperception: Understands the speaker’s general impression.

Evidence: The retention of meaning over specific words used in communication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Describe Wundt’s broad influence

A

Influence on Modern Disciplines: Concepts in Wundt’s Völkerpsychologie prefigure themes in modern social psychology, sociology, and anthropology.

Exploration of Morals and Religion: Investigated how morals arise within cultures and the impact of religion on behavior.

39
Q

Describe historical misunderstanding of Wundt

A

Influence on Modern Psychology: Wundt’s inquiries largely shaped contemporary conceptions of psychology, including its problems, methods, relations to other sciences, and limitations.

Misrepresentation: Current portrayals of Wundt in many texts and courses often diverge significantly from the historical figure, as noted by Wundt scholar Arthur Blumenthal.

Distortion of Wundt’s Ideas in America

American Students’ Interpretation: Few of Wundt’s psychological systems survived intact when American students returned from studying with him.

Case of Edward Titchener:

o Misrepresentation of Wundt’s Ideas: Though influenced by Wundt, Titchener’s psychology diverged significantly, partly due to his inability to move beyond the English positivist tradition.

o Misidentification with Structuralism: Wundt’s school was voluntarism, not structuralism as often associated with Titchener.

40
Q

Describe Wundt’s true ideological stances

A

Empiricism and Rationalism: Wundt blended elements of both empiricism and rationalism in his approach.

Beyond Simple Introspection: His methods rarely included the type of introspection later criticized.

Interests Beyond Basic Awareness: Wundt’s interests extended to understanding complex cultural phenomena through Völkerpsychologie.

Establishment of Independent Academic Discipline: Recognized for his role in founding scientific psychology and establishing it as an independent academic discipline in Leipzig.

Legacy in Doctoral Training: Trained over 100 doctoral students in psychology, including 14 Americans before 1900.

41
Q

Give a brief description of Titchner

A
  • Wundt’s student

Authoritarian Leadership: Dominated his domain at Cornell, dictating research projects and defining psychology.

Experimental Psychology: Defined psychology as experimental psychology, dismissing American psychologies prior to the 1880s.

42
Q

How did Titchner view applied psych and behaviourism?

A

Criticized behaviorism and did not favor psychological research for applied value, emphasizing pure science.

43
Q

Describe relationship with APA

A

Founding Member of APA: Never active in APA meetings, even when hosted in Ithaca.

Establishment of the Experimentalists: Founded his own group in 1904, emphasizing pure experimental psychology. Membership was by invitation only.

44
Q

Describe Titchner’s misrepresentation of Wundt

A

Cultural and Intellectual Differences: Significant differences existed between Titchener’s and Wundt’s psychological approaches.

Legacy: Despite his deep understanding of both Wundt’s and his psychological schools, Titchener’s portrayal of Wundt’s work has been questioned by modern scholarship.

45
Q

Describe Titchner’s influence

A

Doctoral Program: Developed the largest doctoral program in psychology in the U.S. at Cornell.

Contribution to Psychology: His rigid definition of psychology and his emphasis on experimental methods significantly shaped the field.

Influence Beyond Death: His organization, the Experimentalists, continued to influence psychology after his death.

46
Q

Describe Titchner’s attitude toward women

A

Contradictory Views: Criticized for excluding women from the Experimentalists, yet was a strong advocate for women in academic psychology.

Doctoral Students: Approximately half of his first 12 doctorates and around 20 of his 56 doctoral students between 1894 and 1927 were women.

Support at Cornell: Accepted women into his graduate program at a time when other prestigious universities did not.

47
Q

Describe criticisms of Titchner and his perspectives

A

Critics’ Views: Some suggest Titchener conformed to Cornell’s liberal stance on women, but his strong personality makes this unlikely.

Hiring Women Academics: Actively supported hiring qualified women, even against administrative opposition.

Reflection of the Era: His attitudes might reflect the norms of his time as much as his personal beliefs.

48
Q

Describe structuralism’s decline

A

Structuralism, closely tied to Titchener, largely faded after his death in 1927.

49
Q

Describe the goals of structuralism

A

Focus on Immediate Experience: Concentrated on studying consciousness, akin to Wundt.

Definitions:

o Consciousness:Sum total of mental experience at any given moment.

o Mind:Accumulated Experiences Over A Lifetime.

Goals of Structuralism

  1. The’What’:Determine the basic mental elements through introspection,aiming for
    a catalog of components of conscious experience.
  2. The How’:Understand How These Elements Combine.
  3. The Why’:Search For Neurological Correlates Of Mental Events.
50
Q

Describe the methodology that Titchener used

A

Descriptive, Not Explanatory: Focused on describing mental experience, not explaining it in terms of cognitive processes.

Positivism Influence: Influenced by Ernst Mach’s positivism, Titchener eschewed speculation on unobservable events.

Parallel to B.F. Skinner’s Approach: Similar to Skinner, Titchener avoided metaphysical theorizing, focusing on observable phenomena (though Titchener’s focus was on introspectively observable conscious events).

51
Q

Describe structuralism’s goal and vision

A

Mental Elements Periodic Table: Aimed to create a systematic classification of mental elements, analogous to the periodic table in chemistry.

Exploration of Complex Experiences: Once basic elements were identified, the laws governing their combination into complex experiences were to be determined.

Neurophysiological Correlations: Sought to identify physical brain events correlated with mental phenomena.

Descriptive Focus: Emphasized describing the ‘is’ of mental life, leaving the ‘is for’ (purpose or cause) to others.

52
Q

Describe Titchener’s Use of Introspection and Mental Elements

A

Complexity Compared to Wundt: Titchener’s introspection method was more complex than Wilhelm Wundt’s approach.

oWundt’s Approach: Subjects reported if an experience was triggered by an external object/event.

o Titchener’sApproach:Subjects described basic,raw,elemental experiences forming complex cognitive experiences.

Training Requirement: Subjects were trained to avoid reporting the meaning of a stimulus.

Focus on Elemental Description: Instead of naming an object (e.g., an apple), subjects described its attributes (hue, shape, texture, etc.).

Avoiding “Stimulus Error”: Naming the object was considered a stimulus error, as it deviated from the introspection of sensations to perceptions.

Example: If shown an apple, a subject should focus on describing its red color, round shape, and smooth texture rather than labeling it as an “apple.” This is because naming the object shifts the focus from internal sensations to external perceptions, which Titchener aimed to avoid.

53
Q

Describe the evolution of Titchener’s method

A

Late Career Modification (Referenced: Evans, 1984):
o Inclusion of Untrained Observers:Shift towards valuing phenomenological reports from untrained observers.

o Implication for Modern Psychology:This approach aligns with modern phenomenological psychology practices (e.g., Pollio, Henley, & Thompson, 1997). o

Unfulfilled Potential:Titchener Died Before Fully Exploring This Modified approach.

54
Q

What made up consciousness according to Titchener?

A

o Sensations:Elements Of Perceptions.
o Images:Elements of Ideas.
o Affections:Elements Of Emotions.

55
Q

How were elements introduced?

A

o Attributes of Sensation and Images:Quality,intensity,duration, clearness, and extensity (spatial spread).

o Attributes of Affections:Quality,intensity,and duration,but lacking clearness and extensity.

56
Q

Describe the characteristics of attribute

A

Quality: Describing the nature of a sensation or emotion (e.g., the bitterness of a taste).

Intensity: The strength or vividness of a sensation or emotion (e.g., the loudness of a sound).

Duration: How long the sensation or emotion lasts.

Clearness: How distinct or clear the sensation or emotion is.

Extensity: Spatial aspect, relevant to sensations and images (e.g., how spread out a sound feels).

57
Q

Describe focus of Titchener’s studies

A

Primary Focus on Sensations: Especially visual (approx. 30,000 identified) and auditory (approx. 12,000).
Lesser Focus on Affections and Least on Images.
Late Career Shift: From studying elements to their attributes for better understanding.

58
Q

Describe his rejection of Wundt’s tridimensional theory of feeling

A

o Single Dimensional: Only pleasantness-unpleasantness, contrary to Wundt’s
three-dimensional theory (pleasantness, tension-relaxation, excitement-calm).

oRationalization: Other dimensions by Wundt were seen as combinations of sensations and true feelings.

Law of Combination
Objective: To understand how elemental thoughts combine into complex mental processes.

Rejection of Wundt’s Theories: Titchener dismissed Wundt’s concepts of apperception and creative synthesis.

59
Q

Describe his adoption of associationism

A

o Primary Law: Law of contiguity as Basic Law Of Association.

o DescriptiveFormula:Sensory Or Imaginal Processes In Consciousness Are likely to be accompanied by similar processes experienced in the past.

o Translation into General Law of Association: Law of contiguity aligns with his general law of association (Titchener, 1910, pp. 378–379).

60
Q

Describe Titchener’s view on attention

A

Attention as an Attribute: Titchener regarded attention merely as an attribute of sensation, specifically its clearness.

Rejection of Wundt’s Concept: Dismissed the idea that we make sensations clear by attending to them.

Clarity vs. Attention: Sensations are inherently clear or vivid; those that are clearer are the ones we are said to attend to.

o Example of Attention as Clarity:
If two sounds are present, and one is louder (clearer), Titchener would argue that the clearer sound is the one we are attending to, purely because of its vividness, not because of any mental process of ‘choosing’ to focus on it.

Muscle Contractions and Sensation: The physical sensations of effort or concentration during “attention” are just muscle contractions accompanying vivid sensations.

Simplistic View of Attention: Titchener saw no need for faculties or functions to explain attention, reducing it to clearness of sensation.

61
Q

Describe the context theory of meaning

A

Definition of ‘Meaning’: Titchener linked the concept of meaning to associationism.

Interplay of Sensations and Images:
o Never Isolated Sensations: Sensations always elicit images of previously experienced sensations.

oCore and Context Formation: A vivid sensation or group forms the core, while elicited images form a context, giving the core its meaning.

o Examples:
A rattle might elicit images of the baby who used it, giving the rattle meaning.

A picture of a loved one could evoke images related to the person’s words and actions, providing meaning to the picture.

Empiricism and Associationism: Even for abstract concepts like meaning, Titchener maintained his empiricist and associationist philosophy.

62
Q

Describe neurological correlates of mental events

A

Titchener’s Stance: Identified as a psychophysical parallelist.

o Understanding Psychophysical Parallelism
Example: Titchener might explain a person’s feeling of happiness (mental event) by correlating it with certain brain activities (physiological process), not as a direct cause, but as a parallel process giving context to the mental event.

Beliefs on Mind-Body Relationship:

oPhysiological Processes as a Substrate: They provide continuity to psychological processes.

oRole of Nervous System: Not causative of mental events but explanatory of some characteristics.

oNeurophysiological Processes: Serve as a description of the circumstances under which mental processes occur.

63
Q

Describe the historical context of neurological correlates

A

Long-Standing Interest in Mind: Interest in the mind dates back to early humanity and Greek philosophy.

Empiricists and Rationalists: Agreed on the senses being gateways to the mind.

Scientific Focus Evolution: Progressed from sensory processes to neural transmission, brain mechanisms, and conscious sensations.

64
Q

Describe the decline of structuralism

A

Comparison with Wundt’s Work: Titchener’s structuralism can be seen as a refinement or departure from Wundt’s ideas.

Reasons for Decline:

o Philosophical Roots:Structuralism Aimed to scientifically study traditional philosophical concerns about sensory information and mental events.

o Issues with Introspection: Yielded inconsistent results and was seen as changing the phenomenon being observed.

Example of Inconsistency: Two highly trained introspectionists might observe the same stimulus (e.g., a sound) but describe it differently based on their subjective experiences, highlighting introspection’s unreliability.

o Exclusion Key Areas:Ignored Significant fields like animal Behavior, psychopathology, personality, learning, development, and individual differences.

o Lack of Practical Applications:Titchener Focused On Pure Knowledge, disregarding everyday problem-solving.

o End with Titchener: Structuralism largely ceased after Titchener’s death.

65
Q

Describe functionalism

A

Response to Structuralism’s Limitations: Aimed to address areas neglected by structuralism, incorporate evolutionary theory, and utilize more reliable research methods than introspection.

Titchener’s Naming: He termed the new school of thought “functionalism.”

Functionalism’s Focus: Concerned with the purpose of the mind (the “what for”) instead of its structure (the “what is”).

o Shift to Functionalism
Practical Example: Functionalism would study why humans develop fear responses (the purpose), rather than just analyzing the sensation of fear itself, as structuralism might.

66
Q

How did Brentano contribute to psychology?

A

published concurrently with Wundt’s work.
Act Psychology:
o Focused on mental processes and their functions,rather than contentsor biological aspects.
Etc.
o Emphasized ‘mental acts’ like judging, recalling, expecting, doubting, loving,
o Introduced Concept Of Intentionality:the idea that mental acts inherently refer to objects outside themselves.
o Differentiated Between The Act Of Perceiving(e.g.,seeing)and the object of perception (e.g., the color red).

67
Q

How did Brentano’s introspection differ from Wundt and Titchener?

A

Differed significantly from Wundt and Titchener.

o Rejected analytic introspection that focused on sensations or elemental experiences.

o Adopted phenomenological methods,studying intact,meaningful experiences.

68
Q

Describe Brentano’s philosophical stance

A

Alignment with German Rationalism: Viewed the mind as active, countering the passive view of British empiricists, French sensationalists, and structuralists.

69
Q

Who did Brentano influence?

A

Freud, Gestalt and Existential Psychology

70
Q

Where is Brentano’s work particularly relevant?

A

o Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence:Brentano’s Concept Of
intentionality remains central (e.g., works of Searle).

71
Q

How did Brentano differ from his contemporaries?

A

Mostly through methodology

o Introspection: Analyzing individual sensations or elements of experience.

o Phenomenology(Brentano’s approach): Examining whole,meaningful experiences as they naturally occur.

72
Q

What did Stumpf contribute to psych?

A

Experimental Psychology:
o Focus on acoustics perception.
o Published Influential Works On The Psychology Of Tone(1883,1890).

Broader Interests:
o Worked On Emotional And Perception Psychology,scientific theory, research methodology, and evolutionary theory.

Integration of Psychology and Philosophy: Advocated for the close relationship between these fields.

73
Q

Describe Stumpf’s methodological approaches and legacy

A

Methodological Approach and Legacy
Study of Mental Events:
o Argued for studying mental events as meaningful units without breaking them down further.
o Focused on mental phenomena rather than conscious elements.
Influence on Gestalt Psychology:
o His methods laid the foundation for Gestalt psychology.
o His chair at the University of Berlin was later occupied byWolfgangKöhler, a prominent Gestalt psychologist.
o Mentored key figures in Gestalt psychology: Max Wertheimer,Kurt Koffka, and Kurt Lewin.

74
Q

Describe Stumpf’s investigation of Clever Hans

A

o A horse named Clever Hans, owned by Wilhelm von Osten in Berlin, appeared to solve arithmetic problems by tapping or nodding.

o The horse’s abilities made it a celebrity,attracting widespread attention and
skepticism.

Investigation of Clever Hans
Initial Inquiry:
o Stumpf Was Appointed By the Berlin Board of Education to lead an investigation.

o The initial investigation by Stumpf’s committee couldn’t determine how Hans answered questions correctly.

Oskar Pfungst’s Role

Further Investigation:

o Stumpf assigned Oskar Pfungst,a graduate student, for a deeper investigation.

o Pfungst applied rigorous experimental methods to the problem.

Findings:
o Discovered that Hans’s performance dropped to chance levels when the questioner was out of sight.

o Identified that Hans was responding to subtle,unintentional cues from the questioner.

Replication of the Phenomenon:
o Pfungst replicated Hans’s performance by providing similar subtle cues.

75
Q

What implications does this phenomenon have?

A

o Rosenthal later discussed how the Clever Hans phenomenon has implications for psychological experimentation, particularly in terms of experimenter
bias.

o Experimenter bias refers to the influence of an experimenter’s expectations
on the outcomes of an experiment.

76
Q

How can we mitigate experimenter bias?

A

o Emphasized Use Double-blind procedure sinexperimentstominimize experimenter bias.

77
Q

Describe Stumpf’s methodological rigor

A

Application of Experimental Psychology: Stumpf’s approach in the Clever Hans case demonstrated the importance of systematic investigation and experimental methods in psychology.

78
Q

Describe Clever Hans in the context of animal research

A

Interpretation of Animal Behavior: The case serves as a reminder that animals can
be sensitive to human cues, complicating the assessment of their cognitive abilities.

Relevance to Modern Psychological Research

Influence on Research Practices: The lessons learned from the Clever Hans case have informed modern research methodologies, emphasizing the need for careful control of experimental conditions to avoid unintentional biases.

79
Q

Describe Husserl’s phenomenology

A

Logical Investigations (1900–1901): A significant work dedicated to Stumpf.

Interest Areas: Initially focused on mathematics and logic before delving into philosophy and psychology.

80
Q

Describe Husserl’s concept of intentionality

A

Adoption from Brentano: Embraced Brentano’s concept that mental acts are functional and directed outward.

Husserl’s Expansion: Advocated for understanding both outward-directed mental acts and inward subjective experiences.

81
Q

Describe two types of phenomenological methods

A

Two Types of Methods:

o Focusing On Intentionality(outward-directed mental acts).

o Concentrating On Subjective Experiences(inward focus).

82
Q

What is pure phenomenology?

A

Aimed at understanding the essences of mental processes.

83
Q

What is a phenomenon?

A

Refers to whole, intact, meaningful experiences, distinct from fragmented conscious experiences.

84
Q

How was psych compared to the natural sciences?

A

Comparison with Natural Sciences: Criticized psychology’s emulation of natural science methods for studying mental events.

Analogy: Likened inappropriate methods in psychology to forcing oranges into an egg carton, emphasizing the need for suitable approaches for psychological phenomena.

85
Q

Describe Husserl’s approach to psych

A

Taxonomy of the Mind: Aimed to describe mental essences related to human experiences and interactions with the world.

Prerequisite to Experimental Psychology: Argued that understanding the essence of mental processes is essential before conducting experiments.

Difference from Structuralism: Focused on meanings and essences, not just mental elements.

86
Q

Describe Husserl’s phenomenological analysis?

A

Deep Analysis of Experience: Husserl’s phenomenology involves examining
experiences as they are lived, without breaking them down into smaller components.

87
Q

How did Husserl contribute to our understanding of consciousness?

A

Exploration of Consciousness: His work represents a significant shift from looking at consciousness as a set of elements to exploring it as a holistic, lived experience.

88
Q

How did Husserl impact modern psych?

A

Foundation for Modern Approaches: Husserl’s focus on the essence of mental processes laid groundwork for later psychological theories and methodologies that emphasize the subjective nature of human experience.

89
Q

Describe Kulpe’s notion of imageless thought

A

Challenged Wundt and Titchener’s idea that all thoughts have specific referents (sensations, images, or feelings), proposing the existence of imageless thoughts.

90
Q

Describe Kulpe’s systematic experimental introspection

A

Methodology: Developed a technique involving subjects solving problems and then reporting on their mental operations.

Focus on Thinking Process: Explored different stages of problem-solving, including mental experiences before, during, and after problem-solving.

Findings: Identified mental acts like searching, doubting, confidence, and hesitation as imageless thoughts.

91
Q

Describe Kulpe’s impact on psych

A

Influence on Phenomenology: Külpe’s work on imageless thought paralleled Husserl’s efforts in pure phenomenology.

Debate on Introspection: His work contributed to ongoing debates about the validity and limitations of introspective methods in psychology.

92
Q

Describe Kulpe’s relationship with both Wundt and Titchner

A

Collaboration and Divergence: Although Külpe started his career under Wundt and maintained respect with Titchener, his theories eventually diverged significantly from their views.

93
Q

Describe Kulpe’s role in advancing psychological thought

A

Expansion of Psychological Inquiry: Külpe’s introduction of imageless thought expanded the scope of psychological research beyond sensory and perceptual processes to more abstract cognitive functions.

94
Q
A