Chapter 8 Selected Issues in the Law of Evidence Flashcards
What are somethings the Judge will consider when deciding whether a statement is to be excluded?
- Physical, mental, phycological condition at the time the statement was made.
- Mental, Physical, Intellectual disability
- Nature of questions
- Threat, promise, Representation
What will the court weigh up when deciding if evidence had been improperly obtained?
- Importance of any right breached
- nature of impropriety
- nature + quality of improperly gained evidence.
- the seriousness of the offence.
- any other investigatory techniques available but not used
- alternative remedies?
- impropriety was necessary to avoid apprehension physical danger
- the urgency in obtaining the improperly gained evidence
What is visual ID evidence?
- An assertion based on what a person saw, to the effect the defendant was present or near a place where an offence occured
- An account (oral, written) of an account regarding the above
When would a statement be improperly obtained?
- Breach of BOR
- Obtained unfairly
3 rules broken
Improperly
Oppression
Reliability Rule
What is resemblance evidence?
Evidence where a witness shares features/attributes of a defendant rather than actual evidence
s45 allows the defence to challenge what type of prosecution evidence?
The reliability of the visual ID evidence
When should a formal ID be completed?
During an investigation or soon after arrest
What is the burden of proof, if a judge deems a statement was gained unreliably?
Balance of Probabilities
If a judge deems the statement as unreliable, when can a statement still be offered as evidence?
When it only pertains to the defendant physical, mental + phycological condition
If BOR have been given before K9 or taking a statement. What must happen after a person is K9’d?
BOR given again
What does oppression mean in this place?
Oppressive, violent, inhuman, degrading conduct.
Threat of conduct or treatment of the kind
Where there has been no formal I.D completed (no good reason) the evidence will be inadmissible unless the prosecution proves what?
Beyond reasonable doubt that the circumstances in which the I.D was made have produced a reliable I.D
What are 3 rule that make a defendants statement inadmissible?
- RELIABILITY RULE
balance of probabilities the statement was not taken in a way to affect reliability. - OPRESSION RULE
whether a statement was influenced by oppression and informs (beyond reasonable doubt) - IMPROPERLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE RULE
whether evidence was improperly obtained on the balance of probabilities.
Generally, there are 2 burdens of proof, What are they and who do they relate to.
Beyond reasonable doubt - Prosecution
Balance of probabilities - Defendant
When is the burden of Proof placed on the defendant?
- For defences of insanity
- Specific statutory exceptions
- Regarding I.D evidence