Chapter 8: New Theoretical Perspectives on Youth Crime Flashcards
General Theory of Crime (Gottfredson and Hirschi)
Focuses on failure to develop self-control which leaves one more likely to engage in crime
Low Self Control Traits
Impulsivity
Lack of Diligence
Risk Taking
Physicality
Insensitivity
Low Frustration Tolerance
Social Bonds
The degree to which individuals through socialization have connections to people and institutions in a society and believe in the rules of the society
Causes of Variation in Self-Control
Ineffective socialization
Failure to supervise individual
Failure to recognize indicators of low self control
Failure to correct or sanction behavior
General Strain Theory (Agnew)
Focuses on how negative situations or strains can lead to crime
Strain + conditioning factors + negative emotions = criminal coping
Strains
Experiences or situations that individuals perceive as being negative, creating negative emotional reaction that provides possible incentive for using crime as a coping mechanism
The most important negative emotion in strain is anger
Types of Strain: Failure to Achieve Goals
Gap between aspirations and achievement expectations
Expected achievements and actual achievements
Gap between just or fair outcomes and actual outcomes
Types of Strains: Removal of Positive Stimuli
These can include property or relationships
Responses could be resorting to deviance to try to prevent the loss, seeking revenge, attempting to recover the loss
Types of Strains: Presentation of Negative Stimuli
This can include criminal victimization, child abuse, and adverse school environments
Response can include avoiding or escaping stimuli, seeking revenge
Types of Strain: Strains Most Likely to Cause Crime
Strains that are severe, long term, frequent, and recent can generate a greater likelihood of offending
Conditioning Factors
Lacking self-efficacy and self-esteem
Associating with criminal peers and peers supportive of criminal behavior
Lacking social support
Control Balance Theory
Focuses on how control can be criminogenic
Control Balance Theory (Tittle)
The degree of control that an individual perceives they have over their environment relative to the degree of control they perceive their environment has over them
Control Ratio
The amount of control a person experiences relative to the amount of control they exercise
This influences the likelihood of deviance
People with a control imbalance can be predisposed to deviance
Contingencies
The process leading to deviance can be influenced by a person’s moral beliefs, self-efficacy, prior deviant experience, subcultural involvement
Differential Coercion Theory (Colvin)
Integrates social control, social learning, general strain, control balance and general theory perspectives with a Marxist approach to explain offending
Two dimensions of control: coercion and consistency of coercion
Erratic coercion + social psychological deficits = chronic predatory offending
Direct Coercion
Ex. control from an interpersonal relationship
Indirect Coercion
Ex. control from forces beyond an individual’s control
A Consistent Non-Coercive Environment
Control is applied firmly and fairly, accompanied by explanation and reasoning for application
Promotes greater social control, self-control, self-efficacy, and internalized sense of control
An Erratic Non Coercive Environment
Control is lenient, negligent and weak
Indifference or detached involvement between individuals in the environment and application of control is faint and inconsistent
Generates low self-control, low social control, control balance surpluses, high self-efficacy
An Erratic Coercive Environment
Control takes the shape of irregular punitive responses to transgressions
Punishments are erratic and random, some behavior is overlooked and some not