Chapter 8 - Delivering The Selected Strategy Flashcards
1.
Organization Configuration and Structure
Identify three major groups of challenges for 21st century organization structures?
1) Flexibility of organizational design:
The rapid pace of environmental change and increased levels of environmental uncertainty demand flexibility of organizational design.
2) Effective systems:
The creation and exploitation of knowledge requires Effective systems to link the people who have knowledge with the application that need it.
3) Globalization:
Creates new types of a new scale of technological complexity in information systems and diversity of culture and approaches to personal relationships bringing their own new problems of organizational form.
1.1
Organizational Configuration
An organization’s configuration consists of the structures, processes and relationships through which the organization operates, Johnson et al 2005.
Three Elements that form part of an organization’s configuration:
a) Structure:
Has it’s conventional meaning of organizational structure.
b) Processes:
They Drive and support people, and they define how strategies are made and controlled, and how the organization’s people interact.
c) Relationships:
Are the connection between people within the organization and between those inside it and those outside.
1.2
Organization Structure
An organization’s formal structure reveals much about it in three ways namely:
a) It shows who is responsible for what.
b) It shows who communicates with whom, both in procedural practice and to great extent in less formal ways.
c) The upper levels of the structure reveal the skills the organization values.
Johnson et al 2005: Seven basic self contained structural types.
- Functional
- Multi-Divisional
- Holding Company
- Matrix
- Transnational
- Team
- Project.
1.3
Functional Structure
In a functional organization structure departments are defined by their functions, eg in a manufacturing company, Primary functions might be production, sales, finance. Sub departments of marketing might be selling, advertising, distribution and warehousing.
For the diagram, refer to page 273.
Advantages of the Functional departmentation:
a) It is based on work specialisim and is therefore logical.
b) The firm can benefit from Economies of Scale.
c) It offers a carrer structure.
Disadvantages of the Functional structure
1) It does not reflect the actual business process by which value is created.
2) It is hard to identify where profits and losses are made on individual products.
3) People do not have an understanding of how the whole business works.
4) There are problems of coordinating the work of different specialisims.
1.4
The Multi- Divisional and Holding Company Structure
The Multi-Divisional Structure divides the organization into semi-autonomous divisions that may be Differentiated by territory, product or marketing, eg the Holding Company, ZESCO Holdings.
Divisionalisation is the division of a business into autonomous regions each with its own revenue, expenditure and profits.
Communication between divisions and Heas office is restricted.
Influence is maintained by head office power to higher and fire the managers who run each division.
Divisionalisation is a function of organization size, in numbers and in product market activities.
Problems in Divisionalisation
1) Different product market divisions might function better as independent companies.
2) A division is partly insulated by the Holding Company from shareholders, which ultimately reward performance.
3) The divisions are more bureaucratic than they would be as independent corporations because of the performance measures imposed by the strategic Apex.
4) Head Office management have a tendency to asap divisional profits by management charges and cross subsidies.
5) It is impossible to identify completely independent products or markets for which divisions will be appropriate.
6) Divisionalisation is only possible at a fairly senior management level because there is a limit to how much independence in the division of work can be arranged.
7) It is a halfway house relying on personal control over performance by senior managers and forcing cross subsidisation.
8) Many of the problems of Divisionalisation are those of Conglomerate Diversification.
Advantages of Divisionalisation
1) It focuses the attention of subordinate management on business performance and results.
2) Management by objectives is the natural control default.
3) It gives more authority to junior managers and therefore provides them with the work that grooms them for more senior positions.
4) It provides an organization structure which reduces the number of levels of management.
The Two forms of the Holding structure are:
-Simple Divisionalisation and Holding Company Structure.
1) Simple Divisionalisation:
Simple Divisionalisation enables concentration on particular product-market areas, overcoming problems of functional specialization at a large scale at a large scale. Head office has too much power control resources. Central functions might be dublicated.
2) The Holding Company Group Structure is a radical form of Divisionalisation where Subsidiaries are separate legal entities.
The legal company can be a firm with a permanent investment and the subsidiaries may have other shareholders.
For diagrams refer to page 275.
1.5
The Matrix Structure
Matrix Structure maintains Functional Department and formalises management control between different functions.
It can be a mixture of a Functional, Product and Territorial organization and they attempt to ensure co-ordination across Functional lines by the embodiment of dual Authority in the organization structure.
A golden rule of classical management theory is unity of command, an individual should have one boss.
1.6
Matrix Organization
In a Matrix Structure, we will have the Functional departments on top, ie Production Dept, Sales Dept, Finance Dept, Distribution Dept, Marketing Dept, etc and below that will be Various Product Departments, ie Product Manager A, Product Manager B, etc.
The Product Managers may each have their own Marketing team, in which case the Functional Marketing Dept would be small or non- existent.
Division of Authority between Product Managers and Functional Managers must be carefully defined.
1.7
The Transnational Structure
The Transnational structure attempts to reconcile global scope and scale with local responsiveness.
The Transnational structure attempts to combine the best features of the approach and the multi-domestic approach in order to create competences of global relevance, responsiveness to local conditions and innovation and learning on an organization-wide scale.
Johnson et al 2005 note that Transnational has three specific operational characteristics:
a) National units are independent operating entities, but also provide capabilities, such as R & D, that are utilized by the rest of the organization.
b) Such shared capabilities allow national units to achieve global, or at least regional, Economies of Scale.
c) The Global corporate parent adds value by establishing the basic role of each national unit and then supporting the systems, relationships and culture, which enables them to work together as an effective unit.
Defined Managerial roles, relationships and boundaries are a must for Transnational Structure to work:
a) Managers of global Products or Businesses have responsibilities for Strategies, Innovation, Resources and transactions that transcend both national and functional boundaries.
b) Country managers must feed back local requirements and build unique local competences.
c) Functional managers nurture Innovation and spread best practice.
d) Managers at the corporate parent lead, facilitate and integrate all other Managerial activity.
1.8
The Team-Based Structure
The Team-based structure extends the Matrix Structure’s use of both vertical functional links and horizontal activity based ones, by utilizing cross functional teams, eg a Purchasing team might contain Procurement specialists, design and production engineers, and marketing specialists in order to ensure that outsourced equipment are properly specified.
1.9
The Project-Based Structure
Is similar to the Team-based structure except that projects by definition have finite life and so do project teams dealing with them. Have a defined life span.
1.10
Choosing a Structure
An organization structure must respond to three challenges which are:
Rapid Change,
Knowledge Management and
Globalization.
Johnson at el 2005 emphasizes that no single structure is suitable for all purposes.
In the table on page 279 choices can be made, as to which challenges they regard as most pressing.
1.10
Nine Tests of choosing a structure, Goold and Campbell 2002
The first 4 relate to the organization’s objectives and restraints under which it operates.
a) Market advantage. Where processes must be closely co-ordinated in order to achieve market advantage, they should be in the same structural element.
b) Parenting Advantage, The structure should support the Parenting role played by the corporate center.
c) People Test. The Structure must be suited to the skills and experience of the people that have to function within it.
d) Feasibility Test.
The next tests are matters of design principle.
e) Specialized Cultures. Specialists should be able to collaborate.
f) Difficult links
g) Redundant hierarchy.
i) Accountability.
j) Flexibility. The structure must allow for requirements to change in the future.
Refer to page 279 for the diagram.
1.11.1
Centralization
Centralization means control is retained at the center of an organization, ie at the Head Office.
In other words, Centralization means a greater degree of central control.
1.11.2
Advantages of Centralization
1) Senior management can exercise greater control over activities.
2) Standardization. Procedures can be standardized throughout the organization.
3) Corporate view. Decisions are made by senior managers for the whole organization.
4) Balance of power. Between different functions and departments.
5) Experience counts.
6) Lower overheads .
7) Leadership. Strong leadership.
1.11.3
Decentralization and it’s Advantages
Decentralization means a greater degree of delegated authority to regions or sub-units.
Decentralization utilizes talent and local knowledge.
Advantages of Decentralization:
a) Workload: It reduces burdens of senior management.
b) Job: It gives subordinates greater job satisfaction.
c) Local Knowledge:
d) Flexibility and Speed: Decision making will be quicker.
e) Training.
f) Control.
Some organizations do combine centralization with Decentralization.