Chapter 8: Defendants and Crime Victims Flashcards
While _________ ____________ are given the right to decide to __________ into a ______ ___________ set forth by prosecution, and ____________ during _____________, all __________ and _____________ decisions are left to the ______________ _______________.
criminal defendants; enter; plea bargain; testify; trial; strategic; tactical; defense attorney
Defendants Primary Responsibility in Court
To focus on appearance and demeanor in court.
It’s important for the _____________ ____________ to have a nice ____________ in court, typically requiring him/her to be well ___________ and __________, but they must have a good ___________ as well. This includes looking ___________ during trial proceedings, not ____________, and offering _________ yet _________ facial expressions.
criminal defendant; appearance; groomed; dressed; demeanor; engaged, frowning, concerned; pleasant
Defendants typically shouldn’t demonstrate ____________ __________ to _________ or _________ testimony in court. They’re encouraged to pass _______ to the __________ __________ or ________ in the ___________’s ______ to bring to their attention anything they want mentioned during trial.
emotional reactions; witness; victim; notes; defense attorney; whisper; attorney’s; ear
3 Areas Representing Defendants At Disproportionately High Levels.
1) Race/ Ethnicity
2) Gender
3) Education Level
In _______, _______% of defendants in _____ of the United State’s largest counties were _________ of ________. Specifically ______% were _________ and _____% were ________-__________. _________ ranges were evenly distributed between those under and over age _______, with the median being ______.
2006; 83; 75; people; color; 24; Mexican; 45; African-American; Age; 30; 32
Exclusionary Rule
Dismisses wrongfully collected evidence by law enforcement that violates defendant’s 4th Amendment, and is therefore considered “unreasonable search & seizure.”
The ___________ ____________’s primary purpose is to deter __________ __________. It’s simply a ___________ ___________ for violations of the ___ __________.
Exclusionary Rule’s; police misconduct; judicial remedy; 4th Amendment.
Weeks v. United States (1914)
Illegally obtained evidence inadmissible in federal prosecutions.
Silver Platter Doctrine
Illegally obtained evidence by STATE police, could be turned over to federal government, and pass as admissible evidence because the federal govt. wasn’t directly involved.
evidence handed over as though it were on a “silver platter.”
Elkins v. United States (1960)
Ended Silver Platter practice.
Prohibited all illegally obtained evidence in federal court regardless of whether it originated from state or federal agents.
In _______, the ____ __________ was applied to the ___________ via incorporation through the _____ ____________, but didn’t include with it the _____________ ___________.
1949; 4th Amendment; states; 14th Amendment; exclusionary rule
Wolf v. Colorado (1949)
Exclusionary Rule didn’t apply in state prosecutions
Rochin v. California (1952)
The exclusionary rule was applied to state prosecutions unevenly.
Evidence that constituted “shocked conscience” was inadmissible in court.
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Exclusionary rule applied to state prosecutions.
2 Primary Responsibilities of Exclusionary Rule
1) Deter Police Misconduct
2) Uphold Judicial Integrity
(Supreme Court more intently focused on the first criterion)
Supreme court focused more intently on the __________ responsibility of the ___________ _________, being to _________ __________ ___________, more so than the latter:_________ ___________ __________. Because they focused more on the _________ criterion, the _____________ ____________ became limited in its ____________, creating several ________ to the rule. The rule itself can only be applied in ____________ ___________.
first; Exclusionary Rule; deter police misconduct; upholding judicial integrity; first; Exclusionary rule; application; exceptions; criminal trials
Massachusetts v. Sheppard & United States v. Leon (1984)
Illegally obtained evidence found under invalid search warrant, issued by neutral magistrate, by law enforcement acting in good faith, is admissible
Illinois v. Krull (1987)
applied “good faith” rule to cases where police act in reliance on statute later condemned unconstitutional.
Arizona v. Evans (1995)
Court ruled exclusionary rule can’t be used in cases where police act in reliance on report, written by court clerk, that turned out to be an error.
Nix v. Williams (1984)
Introduced inevitable discovery exception to exclusionary rule.
Ruled that illegally obtained evidence by law enforcement is admissible if it was going to be found anyways under a legal means.
Illegally obtained evidence may be ____________ in court if it is not used to ________ the ___________ of the ____________.
admitted; prove; guilty; defendant
______ Amendment guarantees the right to a _____________ ____________ in all criminal prosecutions.
6th; speedy trial
From ___________ to _____________, a defendant may spend _____ to ______ days in custody, while one whose not a defendant may spend ______ - ______ days in custody.
Arrest; arraignment; 60; 90; 90; 120