Chapter 11: The Criminal Trial Flashcards
What the Prosecutor might say in his Opening Statement/ Brief statement before trial
Describes…
- The crime
- Defendant’s motivations for committing crime
- Impact on Victim / Victim’s family
Prosecuting attorney may also _________ the jury through the ______ of the crime, explain the _______ he/she plans to use, and _____ why the ________ is __________ during the Opening Statement.
walk; events; evidence; explain; evidence; relevant
What do Defense Attorneys usually remind the jury of during their Opening Statement?
- Defendant is not guilty until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
-The Prosecution must reach the burden of proof of ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ - Encourages jury to keep an open mind until they’ve heard all evidence from the case.
The Defense attorney has the option of ___________ his/her ___________ __________ until the _____________ has _______________ their case.
reserving; opening statement; Prosecution; closed
Why does the Prosecution go first in presenting evidence?
Prosecution is the one with the burden of proof.
(Defendant is assumed innocent until proven otherwise by the prosecution)
Bear in mind an ___________ of ___________ for the ____________, is not a prediction of the case outcome, its procedure for what’s considered ________ _______.
assumption; innocence; defendant; fair trial
Judgement of Acquittal
Defense attorney moves for (motions) directed verdict of not guilty
Request by defense attorney to rule that evidence introduced by prosecution is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
What happens if a Judgement of Acquittal is granted.
If the judge grants the defense attorney’s motion’ the defendant is discharged, and the case is over.
T/F: The defendant has to present evidence and introduce witnesses.
What may a defense attorney do in a case where the defendant doesn’t have a valid defense?
False
The Defense attorney will try to create distrust and confusion among jurors by questioning of the the witnesses called by prosecution, through cross examination.
Cross examination is an opportunity for ________ to __________ a __________’s testimony by getting witnesses to ____________ what they had previously said on ____________ __________, by __________ out _____________ in a witnesses testimony, and getting the ___________ to admit to a past ______________ ______________, and questioning the ___________ to figure out what his/her ____________ are behind __________.
attorney; discredit; victim’s; contradict; direct examination; pointing; inconsistencies; victim; criminal record; victim; motivation; testifying
Redirect Examination
When attorney who first called witnesses, recalls witness to stand to clarify things brought up in cross examination.
Re-cross Examination
Allowed if an issue not initially raised in direct or cross examination is raised in redirect examination.
What gives the defendant the right to cross examine the witnesses against him?
Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment
Coy v. Iowa (1988)
Ruled that defendant has the right to come face-to-face with victim (acting as witness) testifying against him.
Maryland v. Craig (1990)
Ruled that defendant’s right to come face-to-face (in the physical) with the victim (acting as a witness) may be waivered if…
1) it’s important for the furtherance of public policy
2) there’s an assurance of reliability of testimony
Court also ruled it’s of the state’s interest to protect a child abuse victim’s physical and psychological state.
The __________ __________, granted to a defendant by the ____ Amendment, allows the defendant to obtain __________ to ____________ on his behalf. The defendant can only enjoy this right if the ___________ is obtained via a ____________, a ________ ______ by a judge to appear at a specific ____________ and __________ to give testimony. If the person issued the ___________ does not appear on the time and date of the trial, he/she can be held by ___________ of the court, in which they will _________ and _________.
Compulsory Process; 6th; witnesses; testify; witness; subpoena; court order; time; place; subpoena; contempt; fined; jailed.
Privileged Communication
Exception to the rule that all evidence is admissible at trial.
i.e.
A husband may not be compelled to testify against her wife.
A doctor may not be compelled to testify against a patient.
A priest may not be compelled to testify against a parishioner.
When does the Marital Privilege (Privileged Communication) not apply
1) If the victim is the defendant’s spouse or child.
2) And if things discussed between 2 spouses are told in front of a third party.
Privilege Against Self Incrimination
Prosecution cannot question defendant on what happened during commission of a crime.
The ______________ may request a ____________ use _________ _________ to ensure the _________ does not consider the ______________’s ____________ as an indicator of guilt.
defendant; judge; jury instruction; jury; defendant’s silence
T/F: A criminal defendant may waive their right to privilege of self incrimination, and be subject to cross examination by the prosecutor?
True
Is the defendant allowed to testify in their own defense (pro se)?
Yes
2 Types of Evidence admissible at trial.
Real Evidence & Testimonial Evidence
Real Evidence
Tangible items including…
- Fingerprints
- DNA
- Weapons used during the commission of the crime
- Documents
- Pictures of the victim
Testimonial Evidence
Sworn statements of witnesses including
- Eye witnesses
- Police who investigated the crime
- Expert witnesses
Lay witnesses are asked to only testify strictly to what they ______, _________, ________, ___________, and ___________.
saw; heard; felt; tasted; smelled
Direct Evidence
Proves / Disproves an issue is at hand in the case
From…
- Eye witness testimony
- Defendant’s confession to the crime
- Victim’s testimony
Indirect Evidence
Circumstantial Evidence requiring judge & jury to make inferences about what happened during the crime / defendant’s role during crime.
Evidence admitted in court should always be ___________, and _____________.
relevant; competent