Chapter 8 Flashcards
1.Who determines the process to prioritize value in an Agile project?
- The customer
- The Scrum Master
- The product owner
- The entire team
The entire team
The entire team includes the product owner, the development team, and the Agile project manager as well as other stakeholders—even the customer or sponsor. Inevitably, the product owner owns the backlog and needs to prioritize value. Nonetheless, they don’t do that in a vacuum: There is much discussion and interaction when deciding how to determine what is valuable.
2.Misunderstandings of value, product, and customer needs can best be described as which one of the following?
- The gulf of constraints
- The gulf of Agile
- The gulf of misunderstanding
- The gulf value stream
2 The gulf of misunderstanding
The gulf of misunderstanding can occur when value has not been clarified or either the customer or the team misunderstands what will be created on the project. To avoid this misunderstanding, the team will use a variety of techniques to reach consensus on what they are building and why.
3.You are coaching your Agile team in different ways to prioritize value. Which one of the following would not be a way to prioritize?
- Dot voting
- Value stream analysis
- MoSCoW
- Monopoly Money
- Dot voting
Giving the team and other stakeholders colored dots and allowing them to vote on their choices of features and functions allows for discussion and consensus to be reached.
4.During a prioritization exercise with your Agile team, you give each of the stakeholders 100 points. How will they determine priority with those points?
- They will put 100 points on the main feature they want.
- They will break the 100 points into 25-point increments for their top four values.
- They will put the points they want next to the options that they like, and they may place any number of points on any number of the options.
- They will put the points they want next to the options that they like, and they may place any number of points on any number of the options.
The 100-point method is designed to allow for prioritization in a facilitated way. This allows everyone to determine what they feel is most important and score it accordingly.
5.Your customer is describing items they want on the next release of their corporate software program. During discussions of valuable features, they ask if the software can include a new and innovative feature they read their competition may be creating. Your team performs Kano Analysis and determines this feature request falls under the category of:
- Satisfier
- Exciters
- Dissatisfiers
- Indifferent
- Exciters
What this is describing is something new and innovative that hasn’t been done before. That describes an exciter that the customer wants included in the next release.
Agile contracts differ from Waterfall projects in which of the following ways?
- They are longer term to accommodate iterations.
- They can use a fix and switch contract to allow for changes in scope.
- They can be adapted at any time.
- The can be updated for scope changes that have been approved through change control systems.
- 2.They can use a fix and switch contract to allow for changes in scope.
Using a more flexible type of contract on Agile projects allows for updates or change in scope without any penalty or legal breach of contract.
7.Your sponsor has asked you for a review of the scope, time, and cost performance so they can present the information to the shareholders. You have determined that the cost variance is –$3,000 and the schedule variance is $1,000. How is this project progressing?
- The project is over budget and behind schedule.
- The project is under budget and ahead of schedule.
- The project is over budget and ahead of schedule.
- There isn’t enough information to determine project progress.
- 3.The project is over budget and ahead of schedule.
This project is over budget because the cost variance is determined by comparing the earned value to the actual cost. Less work was done and you paid more for it. For the schedule variance, more work was done than planned, so the project is ahead of schedule.
8.Your organization is using a mix of Waterfall and Agile techniques on its project and is very focused on reaching the return on investment level that it has determined the project should meet. Your sponsor is asking for the cost performance index information. What technique can you use to provide that information?
- Earned value technique
- Benefit cost measurements
- Monopoly Money
- Return on investment calculations
- 1.Earned value technique
The earned value technique will allow for a comparative approach between the scope of work planned to be accomplished and what it has cost to accomplish that in order to obtain the cost performance index, or CPI.
9.The planned value on your current project at this point in the schedule is $10,000, and the earned value is $9,600. What is the schedule variance?
- $400.00
- 0.96
- –($400.00)
- 1.04
- 3.–($400.00)
In this case, the question is asking for the schedule variance. The formula for that is earned value − planned value. Because less work was accomplished than planned, this project is behind schedule by $400.00, so the answer would be a negative value. The other answers are either positive numbers or indexes obtained by using the formulas incorrectly.
10.Your customer has been adamant about a certain feature being a part of the finished increment. You have explained time and again that the feature they are looking for will interfere with the rest of the result and cause it not to work as well. What could be the reason for this confusion?
- The gulf of misunderstanding has occurred.
- Kano analysis wasn’t performed.
- The customer is confusing exciters with satisfiers.
- The team isn’t understanding the requirements.
- 1.The gulf of misunderstanding has occurred.
In this question, all answers could be, in some ways, correct. The best answer here is that the customer isn’t understanding your technical jargon and/or why what they want will not be in the final increment. This is due to the gulf of misunderstanding. If Kano analysis had been performed, there would be a better understanding rather than misunderstanding.
You are being tasked by your organization to create a statement of work that will be utilized in the procurement process. The legal department explains to you that they want to make sure that all terms and conditions are negotiated and agreed to up front. Then, when scope needs to be changed, there is more flexibility in the process. To what type of agreement is the legal department referring?
- Fixed-price contract
- Cost-reimbursable contract
- Time and materials contract
- Master service level agreement
- 4.Master service level agreement
A service level agreement allows for terms and conditions to be determined in the beginning so that future changes in scope won’t result in renegotiations throughout the project.
12.Bill is the sponsor on your project and is especially nervous about the budget and meeting the expected ROI. He asks you on a regular basis what things are costing and if you are spending money in the right areas. You suggest to Bill that he come to the team area and explain where he would spend the money if it were his decision and he had the entire project budget to work with. What are you suggesting Bill do?
- Use Monopoly Money to create his budget.
- Use Monopoly Money to show what he values and where he would spend the money.
- He is going to dot vote with the team to determine priority.
- Bill will be performing a Kano analysis on the budget.
- 2.Use Monopoly Money to show what he values and where he would spend the money.
Monopoly Money is a great way to see how a sponsor or customer would spend their money if given the entire budget to disperse.
13.Your customer is working very closely with your team on prioritization of value for their product. There are certain items that must be in the final product no matter what and others that won’t be included unless different information is presented at a later date. Which of the following prioritization techniques does it look like they used?
- Dot voting
- Kano analysis
- MoSCoW
- Monopoly Money
- MoSCoW
In this case, the must-haves versus the won’t-haves points to prioritization using the MoSCoW approach.
14.You are delivering a performance report to your sponsor on the project and have put together an earned value report. Your cost performance index is 1.25. What does that information tell your sponsor?
- The project is over budget.
- The project is under budget.
- The project is getting one dollar’s worth of work done and spending $1.25 on that work.
- The project is getting 1.25 dollars’ worth of work done and spending one dollar on that work.
- The project is getting 1.25 dollars’ worth of work done and spending one dollar on that work.
The cost performance index is a rating of efficiency on the project. Any result over a 1.0 shows that the project is under budget and essentially getting more work accomplished for less money.
Your organization has entered into a contract that can best be described as good for the organization, and the budget requirements are known or stable. What kind of contract did your organization enter into?
- The fix and switch
- A service level agreement
- Fixed price
- Time and materials
- 3.Fixed price
A fixed-price contract is good for organizations that are trying to control costs and have a good understanding of the scope of work. There is less flexibility for scope changes, but cost risk is lower