Chapter 8 Flashcards
What is the definition of the principle of “contribution”?
The right of an insurer who has paid under a policy to call upon others similarly but not necessarily equally liable to the same insured to contribute to the payment
What three things must be common on both policies for a contribution to be valid?
insurable interest, peril and subject-matter
Contribution only applies where the policies cover a common interest in the subject-matter. In other words, the insurable interest is the same (owner, user, bailee etc.). This principle was established in which the case?
North British and Mercantile v. Liverpool and London and Globe (1877), known as the King and Queen Granaries case
What is the North British and Mercantile v. Liverpool and London and Globe (1877) also known as?
the King and Queen Granaries case
Identify two ways in which the principle of contribution is modified?
- Policies contain non-contribution conditions.
- There are market agreements between insurers where they agree not to seek contribution in certain instances
If a policyholder had two life policies would contribution apply?
No, as life policies are benefit policies.
What does rateable proportion contribution condition state?
The the policy will only pay their proportion of the loss
What is the formula for working out the rateable proportion on a sum-insured policy that is dual insured?
Policy sum insured/total sum insured (all policies) x loss
Policy A sum insured: £10,000
Policy B sum insured: £20,000
What % would policy A and then policy B be liable for in the even of a claim where they are both insuring the same thing?
The proportion of the claim paid by policy A is:
10,000/30,000 x100 = 33%
Policy B pays:
20,000/ 30,000 x100 = 66%
Colin’s cottage is valued at £100,000 and is covered by two fire insurance policies with identical terms and conditions. The first policy has a sum insured of £50,000 and the second policy has a sum insured of £100,000. A fire causes damage costing
£60,000 to repair. Once contribution has been agreed between the insurers, how much will be paid by the first policy?
50,000/150,000*60000 = £20,000
“This method calculates the amount payable under each policy as if no
other policy existed and the insurer was alone in indemnifying the insured. The loss is then
shared in proportion to the independent liabilities of the two policies.”
What is this method called?
independent liability method.
When would the independent liability method be used?
This method is used where property policies are subject to average or where an individual loss limit applies within a sum insured.
What is the independent liability method’s formula?
policy sum insured / total value at risk x loss
Policy A sum insured: £10,000
Policy B sum insured: £20,000
Both policies are subject to average.
Total value at risk: £50,000
Loss incurred: £15,000
Whenever the total value at risk exceeds the total sum insured by all policies, what will each policy pay?
policy sum insured / total value at risk x loss
Policy A = 10,000/50,000 x 15,000 = £3,000 or 1/5 of the loss
Policy B = 20,000/50,000 x 15000 = £6,000 or 2/5 of the loss
Total payout = £9,000 or 3/5th’s of the loss.
the remaining 2/5ths the insured will need to cover as he/she was under insured.
What does the non-contribution clause state?
This policy shall not apply in respect of any claim where the insured is entitled to indemnity under any other insurance.
If both policies contain non-contribution clauses - which side would the court favour?
Neither. they are treated as cancelling each other out. This means that each insurer would contribute its rateable proportion.
If one policy has a non-contribution condition and one a rateable proportion condition, what happens?
The insurer with the rateable proportion condition will pay the whole of the claim as they have the weaker clause.
If some specialist jewelry was damaged at someone home, would the home insurance or the specific jewelry insurance cover it?
You would have to check the wording of the policies but there is most likely a clause in there restricting cover in situations where a more specific policy is in place. More specifically - That insurers will not contribute to a loss if the loss is more specifically insured