chapter 7: portfolio theory Flashcards
expected return
standard deviation of the return
- the expected return which we denote r, and
* the standard deviation of the return which we denote σ
given a set of investments whose returns have known expected values
and standard deviations, which one is “optimal”
“highest expected returns”is not =“optimal”: the whole distribution of the returns needs to be taken
into account
investments of 1000
Portfolio A: Will be worth £1,100 with probability 1.
Portfolio B: Will be worth £1,000 with probability 1/2 and £1,300 with probability 1/2.
Portfolio C: Will be worth £500 with probability 1/10, £1,200 with probability 8/10 and
£3,000 with probability 1/10
Expected returns:
Expected returns:
r_A = (1100 − 1000)/1000 = 0.1
r_B = (0.5)(1000 − 1000)/1000 \+ 0.5(1300 − 1000)/1000 = 0.15 r_C = (1/10)(500 − 1000)/1000 \+ (8/10)(1200 − 1000)/1000 \+ (1/10)(3000 − 1000)/1000 = 0.31
percentage of payout/initial payment
Mr. X: Wants to sail around the world on a cruise costing £1,200 a year from now.
Ms. Y: Must repay her mortgage in a year and must have £1,100 to do so.
Dr. Z: Needs to buy a rare book worth £1,300.
Portfolio A: Will be worth £1,100 with probability 1.
Portfolio B: Will be worth £1,000 with probability 1/2 and £1,300 with probability 1/2.
Portfolio C: Will be worth £500 with probability 1/10, £1,200 with probability 8/10 and
£3,000 with probability 1/10
The chances of Mr X. sailing around the world if he invests in investments A,B or C are 0, 1/2
and 9/10 respectively, so he should be advised to invest in C. Only investment A guarantees a return
sufficient for Ms. Y to pay her mortgage and she should choose it. The probability of the investments
being worth at least £1,300 after a year are 0, 1/2 and 1/10 respectively, so Dr. Z should invest in
portfolio B.
So different investors prefer different investments!
Consider two investments A and B with expected returns r_A and r_B and standard deviation of
returns σ_A and σ_B
A1: Investors are greedy:
If σ_A = σ_B and rA > rB investors prefer A to B.
A2: Investors are risk averse:
If rA = rB and σ_A > σ_B investors prefer B to A.
A3: Transitivity of preferences: If investment B is preferable to A and if investment C is
preferable to B then investment C is preferable to A.
We are introducing a partial ordering ≺ on the points of the σ-r plane
considering diagram of σ against r
r | *B * C | *A | *D \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_σ B at (σB ,rB ) etc
A is directly under B, C on same horizontal as B
B is preferable to both A and C. Investments A and C are
incomparable.
We are introducing a partial ordering ≺ on the points of the σ-r plane
** ie those on a horizontal line have same r (r_A=r_B), expected return ,and lower (right ) σ preferred
** ie those on a vertical line have same σ, deviation, so preferred higher expected return r (towards top)
INDIFFERENCE CURVES
describe preferences of investor by specifying sets of
investments which are equally attractive to the given investor
DEF indifference curve of an investor: this is the curve
consisting of points (σ,r) for which investments with these
expected returns and standard deviation of returns are all equally attractive to our investor.
INDIFFERENCE CURVES and assumptions of risk aversion etc
A1, A2 and A3 imply that these curves must be non-decreasing
EXAMPLE: indifference curves for investors
r | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | L |_|_|_|\_\_\_σ
Investor X cannot tolerate uncertainty at all: this investor
prefers a certain zero return rather a very large expected
return with a small degree of uncertainty.
less risk
EXAMPLE: indifference curves for investor Y
r | | | | | / / / / | / / / / |_/ / / / L\_\_/\_\_/\_\_/\_\_σ
Investor Y is willing to take some risks
slightly curved
less risk would be straighter
EXAMPLE: indifference curves for investor Z - - - - r - - - | - - - | / / / --- | / / / / |/ / / / |/ / / L/\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_σ
Investor Y is willing to take some risks but not as much as investor Z
(his indifference curves are steeper.)
curves hard to show
EXAMPLE: indifference curves for investor
r |\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ |\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ |\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ |\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ L\_\_\_\_\_\_\_σ
Investor W is risk neutral.
Consider two investments A and B with expected returns r_A and r_B and standard deviation of returns σ_A and σ_B .
We split an investment of £1 between the two investments:
consider portfolio Πt consisting of t units of investment A and
1 − t units of investment B.
call this Πt #1
risky investments A and B ie we have risks/ standard dev non zero
We split an investment of £1 between the two investments:
consider portfolio Πt consisting of t units of investment A and
1 − t units of investment B.
We can do this for any t and not just 0 ≤ t ≤ 1.
For example, to construct portfolio Π2 we short sell £1 worth of B
and buy £2 worth of A, for a total investment of £1.
portfolio Πt #1
VARIANCE of
Let A and B be the random variables representing the annual return of investments A and B.
The variance of Πt is given by Var(Πt) = Var(tA + (1 − t)B)
= Var(tA) + Var((1 − t)B) + 2Covar(tA,(1 − t)B)
= t^2Var(A) + (1 − t)^2Var(B) + 2t(1 − t)Covar(A,B)
= t^2Var(A) + (1 − t)^2Var(B)+ 2t(1−t)ρ(A,B)√[Var(A)Var(B)]
= (tσ_A)^2 + 2t(1 −t)ρ(A,B)σ_Aσ_B + ((1 − t)σ_B)^2
portfolio Πt #1
The shapes of these curves
Proposition 7.1: T
The shapes of these curves are concave:
The curve in the σ-r plane given parametrically
by √[(tσ_A)^2 + 2t(1−t)ρ(A,B)σ_Aσ_B + ((1 − t)σ_B^2],
tr_A + (1 − t)rB for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 lies to the left of the line segment
connecting the points (σ_A,r_A) and (σ_B ,r_B ).