Chapter 6: 'Transnational policing and security', BLOCK 2 BOOK 2 Flashcards
ORGANISED CRIME
- ORGANISED CRIME: A concept emerging first in the United States in the 1920’s but now used internationally - for example, by the United Nations and G8 countries - as shorthand to describe a range of serious crimes that are deemed especially difficult to control.
- It may be defined as the ongoing activities of those collectively engaged in production, supply and financing for illegal markets in goods and services.
TRANSNATIONAL POLICING
- TRANSNATIONAL POLICING: Policing activity that involves systems of cooperation that cross national boundaries.
- Such activity need not be restricted to law enforcement, but may be extended to take in the whole range of police functions including:
a) crime prevention activity
b) social service provision
c) training
d) risk assessment and management
e) state security. - Transnational policing is not new.
- THE SYSTEM is undergoing unprecedented changes due to:
a) increase in global crime
b) terrorist threats
c) increasing demands made by legitimate trade and businesses for the control of threats to the safety of their goods and services.
WHAT IS POLICING?
- One definition of front-line policing is that it is the 24/7 first response service.
- This describes the broad role that the public police have claimed for themselves as a COVER-ALL emergency service and legitimate body of physical control.
- STATE-RUN POLICE - are sanctioned to use physical force where deemed necessary (WESTMARLAND, 2001).
- This is supervised by senior police leaders who are democratically overseen by the HOME OFFICE in the UK and those directly elected in the USA.
- POLICE - are also subject to:
a) rules and discipline
b) and a police complaints procedure should their behaviour fall short of that expected. - BITTNER (2005) - state police have an ability to respond something that shouldn’t be happening, and which someone had better do something about now.
- Community safety officers might be engaged in such work.
but
it is normally sworn police officers that:
a) make arrests
b) use physical force if required
c) are controlled and accountable to strict guidance such as those outlined in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (1984). (PACE).
WAYS PEOPLE ARE POLICED.
- People are policed;
a) at home - TV LICENCE
b) work - SECURITY/CCTV
c) public places - SECURITY/CCTV/POLICE
d) leisure facilities - SECURITY/CCTV/BOUNCERS.
HOW POLICING OPERATES AT A ‘LOCAL LEVEL.’
EXAMPLE - DOMESTIC ABUSE:
private abuse and violence suffered by some women has now become a matter for sworn ‘public police’.
- How THAMES VALLEY POLICE deal with DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (THAMES VALLEY POLICE, 2009).
a) domestic abuses incidents are now graded as ‘urgent’ at a minimum.
b) police officers aim to respond in 1 hour or quicker.
c) officers must publicly intervene in all domestic abuse incidents.
d) Arrest of the perpetrator must always be considered, and officers must justify why they do not arrest the perpetrator.
e) This has led to an increase in the no. of people arrested for DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
f) Domestic violence has not been policed well in the past (WALKLATE, 2008).
HOW ‘PRIVATE SPACES’ ARE CONTROLLED (HOBBS, 2003).
EXAMPLES - MANCHESTER and NOTTINGHAM.
Street-level violence - in some cases public functions have become more private, i.e security staff/bouncers in UK CITIES outnumber sworn police officers by 25 to 1.
- MANCHESTER
a) attracts crowds of 100,000 on Saturday and Friday nights.
b) There are 30-40 OFFICERS engaged on PUBLIC ORDER DUTY at these times.
c) BUT - there are 1000 BOUNCERS simultaneously controlling the crowds per night. - NOTTINGHAM
a) There are 50, 000 people out in Nottingham Friday and Saturday evenings.
b) It is policed by 20-25 sworn police officers
c) BUT - is simultaneously policed by 400 BOUNCERS.
PRIVATE AND SEMI-PRIVATE SPACES.
- These different private arenas such as domestic violence and policing city centres pose different problems for forces of LAW AND ORDER at both a micro and macro-level.
- FOR INSTANCE - Control of the work place is often taken care of IN-HOUSE with little state involvement.
- ALSO -
a) Shopping malls
b) leisure centres
c) and facilities and places where these meet public spaces such as sidewalks/pavements/street are being patrolled by ‘PRIVATE COMPANIES’ rather than traditional ‘sworn’ police officers. - These SPACES are sometimes described as SEMI-PRIVATE (as they are open to the public, but are regulated by laws and rules applied to private property.
CONTROL AND REGULATION
- In ENGLAND and WALES - the number of PRIVATE SECURITY POLICE is double that of SWORN POLICE OFFICERS.
- Despite the introduction of a REGULATION SCHEME and REGULATORY BODY (the Security Industry Authority (SIA) - The scheme is largely voluntary for COMPANIES that employ ‘IN-HOUSE SECURITY STAFF’.
- HOWEVER - ORGANISATIONS that provide SECURITY PERSONNEL such as bouncers and their workers have to be registered in this scheme.
- The UK Government has handed out control to ‘CORPORATE rather than a LEGISLATIVE BODY which lacks the power of similar organisations in EUROPE (BUTTON, 2007).
- FOR EXAMPLE - In Spain and Belgium - state controlled regulatory systems include training, licences, and character checks of employees (BUTTON, 2007).
- In ENGLAND and WALES in 2007 - There were 141,731 ‘sworn’ police officers.
- At the same time - there were 222,000 SIA guards (security) and door supervisors.
- Growing numbers of security workers are taking the place of ‘sworn’ police officers, with full powers of arrest and training in legal issues etc.
- This issue is not new - private policing has always co-existed with public policing.
- QUESTION - has the proliferation of policing and privatisation thus created an over-policed society?
THE ‘MASS PRIVATE PROPERTY’ HYPOTHESIS (SHEARING and STENNING, 1983).
- The MASS PRIVATE PROPERTY HYPOTHESIS was termed by SHEARING and STENNING (1983).
- It argues that previously public places such as shopping malls etc are being:
a) controlled
b) monitored
c) and subjected to surveillance.
- This leads to the exclusion of unwelcome people and activities.
- CRAWFORD and LISTER (2006) - have argued that the agencies that are now involved in governance and patrol of these public/private spaces are the ‘EXTENDED POLICING FAMILY’ supplementing visible policing to keep social order.
- MODERN POLICING - is not simply the preserve of the police, it is carried out in partnership with a wide range of agencies (FLANAGHAN, 2008).
- AS A RESULT - The governments aim is to encourage such agencies to work in partnership using JOINED-UP POLICING’ to address ‘social problems’ that the police cannot address on their own.
‘HISTORY’ OF CROSS-BORDER POLICE COOPERATION.
- Origins of the first organised PAID POLICE ORGANISATIONS had a local focus.
- FOR EXAMPLE - In London the BOW STREET RUNNERS provided one of the first models for the UNIFORMED POLICE (EMSLEY, 2001).
- The new police of 1829 were established because propertied classes demanded security and protection for themselves, their property, and their possessions.
- LATER - The core concern of the police was with LAW ENFORCEMENT and PEACE KEEPING throughout England (EMSLEY, 1996).
WESTPHALIA SYSTEM
- Westphalia system - was established following the 30 years war (1618-48).
- This was because states wanted to maintain autonomy within their borders and therefore agreed not to cross the borders of other states.
- The PEACE OF WESTPHALIA led to the origins of the modern system of sovereign states that came into existence by mutual recognition of each others unalienable jurisdictions.
- The Westphalia states - began to recognise:
a) geographic boundaries
b) the right to govern their own sovereign spaces
c) see each other as independent entities
- European states - now formed a pattern of independent and interdependent sovereignties.
- States saw themselves as independent and reliant on each others cooperation to maintain their position.
- These principles of ‘internal sovereignty’ were based on feudal, religious, and dynastic ideals rather than democratic ideals.
- As a result - concepts of internationally agreed laws and diplomacy evolved.
- In effect - neighbouring countries wanted internal security for their goods and people.
- The Westphalia system formalised the rights of the states to maintain their borders.
- So - this was a development in the way ‘international crime control’ evolved (ANDREAS AND NADELMANN, 2006).
CRIMINALISATION OF ACTIVITIES - SLAVERY AND DRUGS.
DATELINE.
Brief dateline of ‘international cooperation’ on the prohibition of slavery and drugs. (ANDREAS AND NADELMANN, 2006).
SLAVERY:
- 1833 - slave trade was abolished in Britain
- 1848 - slave trade was abolished in France
- 1904 - White slave trade - people trafficking for sex was abolished via ‘international agreement’ for the suppression of the white slave trade.
DRUGS:
- 1961 - OPIATES and COCOA was criminalised by United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs
(amended by 1972 protocol).
As international society became more orderly - benefit from stealing from one another gave way to to having the advantage of STABLE COMMERCIAL RELATIONS.
Thus - diplomacy and trade were becoming important and this was reflected in in certain acts being criminalised such as:
a) slavery
b) opium trade
c) piracy
was all prohibited.
COOPERATION IN LAW ENFORCEMENT - TRANSNATIONAL POLICING.
- At its simplest level - transnational policing is any sort of system or process that involves agents of state control cooperating across national borders.
- This is not new and has a long history (ANDREAS AND NADELMANN, 2006).
- Transnational policing is a response to:
a) the needs and demands of integrated world economics
b) increasing and changing opportunities for criminals. - EXAMPLES of such criminal activities include:
a) drugs and people trafficking
b) smuggling of counterfeit goods (alcohol and tobacco etc)
c) smuggling of ‘works of art’
d) illegally trapped ‘endangered species’
e) international fraud - vat fraud and money laundering.
- At an individual level - this includes:
a) frauds via phishing online
b) postal invitations to get rich quick schemes
c) individual fraud.
- NOTE - Some international crimes and transnational policing can be carried out without the perpetrator, victim, or law enforcers ;leaving their country of origin or jurisdiction.
ORGANISED CRIME
- The main goal of organised crime is to make money.
- The UK Government claims that it is working to make the UK less attractive and lucrative to tight knit gangs that work across international borders.
- According to the UK HOME OFFICE: Organised crime -
a) reaches into communities
b) ruins lives by driving crime
c) instils fear into communities.
- ORGANISED CRIME manifests itself in:
a) drug addiction
b) sexual exploitation
c) gun crime
d) immigration crime
e) fraud
f) money laundering
g) internet-related crime.
- OTHER THREATS INCLUDE: -
a) armed robbery
b) kidnap and extortion
c) vehicle crime
d) freight crime
e) cultural property crime
f) counterfeit currency
g) environmental crime.
ORGANISED CRIME GROUPS (OCG’s).
- Organised crime groups - are business that exist to make money.
- They resort to extreme violence, intimidation, and corruption to protect their businesses.
- These groups operate across global frontiers in tight-knit gangs.
- They have in-depth knowledge of law enforcement methods.
- They exploit sophisticated technologies to conceal their activities from the authorities.
- The two most harmful and profitable enterprises controlled by organised crime groups are:
a) drugs trafficking
b) people smuggling.
- FACTS:
a) GLOBAL PROFITS - from people smuggling is $10 billion
b) 280,000 problem drug users cause half of all crime
c) every $1 spent on heroin generates about £4 of damage to the national economy.
d) There are about 400 organised crime bosses in the UK with an amassed wealth of about £440 million. - Economic and social costs - of organised crime are estimated to be $20-40 billion per year (HOME OFFICE).
The aim of the UK GOVERNMENT is to:
a) protect country’s borders
b) prevent international gangs from entering the country
c) keep dangerous strangers out.