Chapter 6 - Tort Law Flashcards
tort
a civil wrong for which a court will determine liability
liability
a legal obligation or responsibility that one party in a civil lawsuit has to another party, as determined by a court of law
tortfeasor
the party who has committed a tort
three categories of tort law
(1) a wrong involving the person or individual rights
(2) a wrong involving the rights to personal property
(3) a wrong involving the rights to real property
real property
fixed property, principally land and buildings
conversion (law)
the action of wrongfully dealing with goods in a manner inconsistent with the owner’s rights
intentional torts
torts that involve a deliberate or intentional act
negligence
harm that results as a foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s conduct; careless conduct
battery (traditional legal definition)
intentional and nonconsensual contact; it can either cause physical harm or just be offensive or insulting
assault (traditional legal definition)
conduct that causes fear that a harmful or offensive contact will occur; it does not require actual contact
false imprisonment
the intentional confinement of a person against that person’s will; it includes the absence of a reasonable means of escape and a lack of legal authority on the part of the person who is confining the other person
intentional infliction of emotional distress
a common law tort for intentional conduct that results in extreme emotional distress; the elements are:
(a) an intentional or reckless act (negligence)
(b) extreme and outrageous conduct that is beyond the standards of civilized society
(c) the act of the defendant must have actually caused the emotional distress
(d) emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff must be severe
emotional distress
severe emotional disturbance, including such things as sleeplessness, anxiety, irritability, or the emotional inability to perform activities or go places the plaintiff was capable of prior to the harmful event
standard of care
what an individual is expected to do or not do in a particular situation
trier of fact
also called finder of fact; a person, or group of persons, who determines what facts are available and how relevant they are in a legal proceeding, usually a trial; sometimes used as a synonym for judge or jury
reasonably prudent person
An individual who uses good judgment or common sense in handling practical matters. The actions of a person exercising common sense in a similar situation are the guide in determining whether an individual’s actions were reasonable.
malpractice
misconduct of professional persons such as healthcare providers, attorneys, accountants, and others
medical malpractice
misconduct by a healthcare provider against a patient
res ipsa loquitur
Latin for: “the thing speaks for itself”; A doctrine in the Anglo-American common law and Roman Dutch law that says in a tort or civil lawsuit a court can infer negligence from the very nature of an accident or injury in the absence of direct evidence on how any defendant behaved
nonfeasance
failure to perform an act that a person is under a duty to do and that a person of ordinary prudence would have done under the same or similar circumstances (e.g. a patient presents with signs of a fracture but the physician does not order an x-ray)
misfeasance
improper performance of an act that a person might lawfully do (e.g. a surgeon inadvertently nicks a patient’s bladder while performing abdominal surgery)
malfeasance
wrongdoing or legal misconduct, especially by a public official (e.g. a judge taking bribes from the prosecution)
ordinary negligence
failure to exercise ordinary care
gross negligence
very great or excessive negligence that implies an extreme departure from the ordinary standard of care and shows a reckless disregard for the rights of others
ordinary care
also called reasonable care; it is what is expected of most people in most cases
duty of care
a legal obligation which is imposed on an individual, requiring adherence to a standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could foreseeably harm others
breach of duty
a term for what occurs when a person’s conduct fails to meet an applicable standard of care
actual causation
a factor without which the result in question (harm) could not happen (e.g. but for the defendant’s action, the result would not have happened)
proximate causation
a term for what occurs when an event is sufficiently related to an injury that the courts deem the event to be the cause of that injury; it involves foreseeability on the part of the perpetrator
but-for test
but for the existence of X, would Y have occurred?
foreseeability
how likely it was that a person could have anticipated the potential or actual results of their actions
perpetrator
a person who carries out a harmful, illegal, or immoral act
four elements of negligence
duty of care, breach of duty, causation (either actual or proximate) and negligence (harm)
nominal damages
a punishment limited to a recognition of wrongdoing by the defendant; these are awarded when no substantial injury is suffered or the plaintiff fails to demonstrate a valid dollar amount
compensatory damages
the most common type of damages, divided into economic damages and noneconomic damages
punitive damages
damages that exceed mere compensation and that are intended to punish the party and deter certain types of conduct
economic damages
also called special damages; compensation for objectively verifiable monetary losses such as past and future medical expenses or loss of past and future earnings
noneconomic damages
compensation for subjective, non-monetary losses such as pain, suffering, inconvenience, emotional distress, loss of society and companionship, loss of consortium, and loss of enjoyment of life