Chapter 6 - The Key Self-Motives: Consistency, Esteem, Presentation, and Growth Flashcards
Day to day experience - specific things we believe, say, and do - this is self-consistency at the _______ level.
micro
The idea that people don’t like inconsistencies in their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviour and they will try to bias their own attitudes and beliefs to deny inconsistencies.
Cognitive dissonance theory
- inconsistency in who i am bad.
when two cognitions contradict or are inconsistent with each other one experiences something called ________ (2).
cognitive DISSONANCE
- eg: i am a peaceful person but i just punched someone in the face -> cognitive dissonance -> why did i do that wtf
3 Ways to reduce dissonance
- change one of the cognitions
- add a third cognition that makes the first 2 cognitions more aligned
- Disregard the importance of all the cognitions - trivialize - “welp it doesn’t even matter fr anyways”
2 dissonance paradigms (laboratory situations):
- Free choice paradigm
- Induced compliance paradigm
Lab situation where people make a choice between 2 options and after that the attraction to either option is assessed (3).
- the idea that the harder it is to make a choice, the more dissonance there will be after the choice was made -> the one i chose has some negative aspects but the one i rejected has some positive aspects :(((
Free choice paradigm
Putting more emphasis on the good aspects of your chosen option and more emphasis on the negatives of your rejected option -> make yourself feel more secure about the choice.
(Related to the free choice paradigm)
spreading the alternatives
High dissonance condition example for yourself in the free choice paradigm.
Low dissonance condition example for yourself in the free choice paradigm.
- would you rather have Chloe or Elisha die -> I’m not gonna think about this right now cause I know it would cause insane dissonance in my head to actually choose one and i would lose it
- do you want an apple or an orange right now
Paying people $20 to tell people hour long boring tasks were fun -> less cognitive dissonance bc legit reward
Vs.
Paying people $1 to tell people hour long boring tasks were fun -> more cognitive dissonance bc $1 is not worth the hour of boredom
Lab exercise called (3):
induced compliance paradigm
A laboratory situation in which participants are induced or motivated to engage in a behaviour that runs counter to their true attitudes.
induced compliance paradigm
Factors that affect the magnitude of dissonance (4):
- Weak external justification -> $20 strong external; $1 weak
- Prescence of perceived choice
- Commitment to action against beliefs
- Foreseeable Aversive Consequences - this is gonna mess something up in the future why am I doing this - like when i said “do it for the plot” - so stupid, idiot
Cultural influences on cognitive dissonance -> group of people who are more cognitive dissonance wise freaked out by PUBLIC displays of inconsistency
collectivistic
Induced hypocrisy paradigm
expected to produce more _______ within the individuals (2).
make people feel bad about preaching and believing in something but being hypocrites to it themselves
cognitive dissonance
inducing hypocrisy in myself:
it sucks that theres such a disparity between the rich and poor some people don’t even have water and yet people in North America use it so frivolously
And the environment bad for the environment
Me i use it too frivolously, i can’t stop taking long hot showers, bruh -> taking shorter showers idiot if you actually care about other people and the way we’re using 1.6 earths every year when we only have one
I suffered for my country
What I suffered for was valuable
(2)
effort justification
Phenomenon where people reduce cognitive dissonance by convincing themselves what they suffered for was valuable (2).
the reward seems better if you put more effort into trying to achieve it
effort justification
- me when i say studying is valuable. In fact i love studying. I love it. So fun.
Frat houses put pledges or whatever they’re called through crazy or embarrassing or difficult initiations to build loyalty. This is due to _________ (2) .
effort justification
Using a minimal level of external justification necessary to deter unwanted behaviour. -> minimal consequence makes it more likely to decrease desire to do something while severe consequence can make the thing seem more special
minimal deterrence
Misattribution of arousal
Self consistency at the macro level consists of
sustaining a sense of self as a unified whole - how we integrate the micro level self concepts into the macro one
Having a clearly defined, internally consistent, temporally stable self-concept
self-concept clarity
Someone who’s identity is molded by the world and whatever people say to her has
a low self-concept clarity
And honestly I think I’ve been changing that soo
Self-verification
seeking out others and social situations that confirm the way they view themselves
- can be extremely good or extremely bad
- extremely good in the way that people with high self-clarity will find people who reinforce that high self-clarity (treat them how they think they deserve)
- but people with low self-clarity like people with identity issues will find people who reinforce that low self-clarity (treat them badly or whatever)
The extent to which an individual’s self-concept consisted of many different aspects.
3 aspects:
self-complexity
- Social roles
- Relationships
- Activities
Self-narrative
- life story
- draw my life
- past, present, what those mean for the future
Connecting past to present to future - figuring out the because and the WHY, helping us cope
self narratives
that time Jen drew what she wanted to look like in a year; when people manifest what they want to be like (2)
possible selves
The level of positive feeling you have about yourself, the extent to which you value yourself.
self-esteem
self-esteem as a trait
consistent attitude towards yourself for your whole life
self-esteem as a state
feeling about the self that can fluctuate based on circumstances, achievements, or setbacks
- idk i like this definition better because it makes me feel like i can change and get better
Stability of trait self esteem depends on (3 variables):
- reflected appraisals/assessments
- Social comparisons
- Standards of value
self-serving attributional bias
goal of self-serving attributional bias
make external (situational) attributions for bad things people do but internal attributions for their good things
maintain self esteem
placing obstacles in the way of your success to protect your self-esteem from potential failure
self-handicapping
“i didn’t even study and i still got an 85!”
this is stupid i need to stop doing this
Self-handicapping stems from uncertainty about one’s __________ (1).
competence
- real i do this all the time and i feel incompetent
How do i self handicap:
- procrastination - “i waited till the last minute to study and i still got an 80!” “I didn’t do so well on this test but at least i know it was because I didn’t put enough effort in; this doesn’t mean I’m stupid”
- generating test anxiety - i was soooo anxious i couldnt even study on time so the fact that i did is great in itself
- i have mental health issues so the fact that i actually made it this far in life is incredible when you take my extreme mental issues into consideration
I need to stop doing this and causing stress in my life like literally what the hell did i spend a whole week on
Better-than-average effect
people overestimate the frequency of their own good deeds
Form of self esteem defence in which you view others as also having the negative characteristics you have
projection
Compensating by striving very hard to improve in valuable domains of life -> you probably have an
inferiority complex
when people feel threatened, they feel incomplete, and compensate by trying to acquire symbols that support their self-definition (5). (Theory of….)
theory of symbolic self-completion
Eg: someone who feels like they don’t deserve to be in UofA starts wearing their UofA hoodie more often