Chapter 6: Surveys and Observations Flashcards
Open-ended
Allows respondents to answer in any way they see fit. Can be difficult to code and categorize these responses.
Forced-choice
Pick the best of two or more options.
Likert scale
Rate the degree of agreement with each statement. Researchers place “anchors” on the numbers (strongly agree/disagree).
Semantic differential format
Rate a target object using a numeric scale that is anchored with adjectives.
Double-barreled questions
Incorporates two questions into one, which are difficult for participants to accurately answer.
Leading questions
Leading the participant to a particular response through the question wording.
Negatively worded question
A question in a survey or poll that contains negatively phrased statements, making its wording complicated or confusing and potentially weakening its construct validity.
Question order
This matters within a questionnaire and the order that questionnaires are presented in.
Response sets
A shortcut respondents may use to answer items in a long survey, rather than responding to the content of each item.
Acquiescence or yea-saying
When people say “yes” or “strongly agree” without thinking carefully about each item.
Nay-saying
When people say “no” or “disagree” with every item.
Reverse-worded items
Items that are worded to mean the opposite of other items in the scale to spot participants using response sets to answer items.
Fence sitting
Playing it safe by answering in the middle of the scale, especially when survey items are controversial.
Socially desirable responding/Faking good
Giving answers on a survey (or other self-report measure) that make one look better than one really is.
Faking bad
Giving answers on a survey (or other self-report measure) that make one look worse than one really is.
Ways to avoid socially desirable responding
- Make survey anonymous (may treat less seriously/accurately)
- Include special survey items that ID socially desirable responders
- Ask people’s friends to rate them
- Computerized measures like the Implicit Association Test
Ways to avoid fence-sitting
- Take away the neutral option (not great for people who are truly ambivalent)
- Use forced-choice questions
Survey/Poll
A method of posing questions to people online, in personal interviews, or in written questionnaires.
Observational research
When a researcher watches people or animals and systematically records how they behave or what they are doing.
Observer bias
Observers record what they want to see or expect to see, rather than what is really happening. Participant behavior may not change but the interpretation of it by the researcher does.
Observer effects
Due to subtle cues from the researcher, the participants confirm the observer’s expectations.
Preventing observer bias and observer effects
Training, codebooks, multiple observers, or blind (i.e., masked) design.
Masked/blind design
The observers are unaware of the purpose of the study and the conditions to which participants have been assigned.
Reactivity
Participant reacts to being watched and behaves differently.
How to handle reactivity
- Blend in unobtrusive observations (e.g., one-way mirror).
- Wait it out- let the participant get used to your presence.
- Measure the behavior’s results - rather than directly observing the participants, measure something related to the behavior.
Keeping observational research ethical
- How people behave in public places is done with the expectation that others will see it. (no informed consent)
- We don’t report the behavior of specific participants, but of the group as a whole.
- More secretive observation or observation of private behaviors should be done with the permission of the participants (i.e., informed consent).
- Video/audio taping must get special permission. Has to be highlighted!
4 basic questions format (frequency claim)
- Open-ended
- Forced-choice
- Likert scale
- Semantic differential format
Reasons to use behavioral observation over self-report
May be better than self-reports because of the limitations we just discussed (response sets, social desirability).
May be better than self-reports because it can provide more detailed and rich information.
Sometimes self-report may not be possible (how many times do you smile per day?).