Chapter 6: Intersubjectivity Flashcards

1
Q

means we are beings thrown into the world.

A

Dasein

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

can be understood as an

environment, situation, world, space, or even objects and people.

A

there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

“Dasein is never ‘proximally’ an entity which is free from Being-in, but which sometimes inclines to

A

take up a ‘relationship’ toward the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

WHO — there are things about human existence that are not controlled by our
free will and intellect and which we cannot fully comprehend.

A

Heidegger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

It refers to the conditions given to

us and fixed from without. It means that there are features that are beyond our control.

A

factity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

human beings are not only limited to recognizing both things and people but are most essentially capable of

A

connecting with those objects and relating to those individuals encountered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

This means that we do not only recognize the things and the people in
our world but, more so, connect and relate with them.

A

Being relational beings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

This refers to a condition of our existence that has been decided or created by us.

A

transcendence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

establishment of meaningful and authentic relationships

A

subjects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

suggests either being ready-at-hand or present-at-hand.

A

objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

human beings, as Dasein, pertain to two conditions:

A
  1. we are being thrown into it with no access to freedom.

2. we must realize that human beings, as subjects, are innately relational beings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Since we have the innate tendency to establish relationships with our fellow human beings, we have the capacity to

A

transcend our own facticity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

person. It means that there is no gap

or distance between the body and the subjectivity.

A

my body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If we express ourselves through our embodiment, we cannot be distinguished
from it.

A

my body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(my body) For Gabriel Marcel, intimacy is a moment wherein

A

realities are shared

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

suggests that people should realize and

consider the bond that exists between the self and the body.

A

Intimacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

There will be no avenue for the self to use or manipulate one’s body because

A

there is a recognition that the body is also the person and not an object.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

is understood as the possession of the body. It means that we
own our bodies as we own things.

A

Having a body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

We understand our body as a possession because our subjectivity
appears to other people as a body.

A

Having a body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

authentic relationships among humans can only be possible

A

if we treat each other as subjects and not as mere objects, just like treating our embodiment as a person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

It is a fundamental notion that human persons are not solitary beings. This means that a person always lives one’s life together with other human beings.

A

Intersubjectivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

In this relationship, a person not only fulfills one’s call to be human to others but,
most importantly, values this kind of relationship.

A

Intersubjective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

described as the subject-to-object relationship.

A

I-It

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

_______, a Jewish existential philosopher, would differentiate it as an ‘I-Thou
relationship,” subject to subject, and “ I-lt relationship,” that is, subject to object.

A

Martin Buber

25
there is no unity in each other's being but only distance.
I-It relationship
26
is described as the subject-to-subject relationship.
I-Thou relationship
27
This kind of relationship is an | interpersonal relationship.
Interpersonal relationship
28
a relationship is not a meeting wherein one keeps a distance from the other, but an encounter wherein realities are shared and unified.
I-Thou relationship
29
Stated that "If I face a human being as my thou and say the primary word I-Thou to him/her, he/she is not a thing among things and does not consist of things"
Buber
30
violations of our I-Thou relationships.
Manipulations and violations
31
the life of relation.
dialogue
32
defined and understood as disguised dialogue. It is when one insists on talking all by oneself without allowing others to be heard.
monologue
33
As a form of dialogue wherein, an authentic relationship is impossible, what two do not manifest but rather manipulation and abuse reign in monologue?
respect and mutuality
34
described as objective understanding.
technical dialogue
35
because it seeks to achieve a shared understanding and knowledge in both parties but not relationships.
Technical dialogue
36
is commonly understood as a humane dialogue wherein sincerity, presence, sharing, mutuality, availability, and fidelity are manifested. Through this dialogue, all forms of relationship are gradually developed, strengthened, and grounded.
genuine dialogue
37
Buber adds that authentic dialogue is much more essential and sincere in our relationship with the
eternal thou
38
with God, there is no such thing as a
potential substance of being
39
means unchanging | over time. It is calling us to be courageous and persistent in our fidelity while being persevering.
Constancy
40
are manifestations of how | constant we are to our fidelity.
persenverance and immutability
41
Marcel introduced availability, or as he called it
Disponibilité.
42
________ means being present in | all circumstances.
Availability
43
The first act is to commit to the other without _______. The second act is the ________ to that commitment.
questioning one's future disposition; response of the other person
44
is always put into question in a genuine relationship since it requires constancy over time, perseverance, and commitment.
fidelity
45
is a reality wherein one does not only express one's creativity to fidelity but, most essentially, create one's life to meet the demands of fidelity.
creative fidelity
46
"to be disposable is to believe | the other, to place me at her disposal and to maintain the openness of
Disponibilité.
47
consists in actively maintaining ourselves in a state of openness and permeability — open to the influx of the presence of the other"
creative fidelity
48
Creative fidelity is not just about being | committed and disposed to the other but also about having
gleaming hope toward the relationship | and the other.
49
something transcendent that human beings keep.
Hope
50
For | Marcel, it is the final guarantor of fidelity.
Hope
51
It means that we submit everything to a transcendent being | (Buber calls it "Eternal Thod'), hoping that He will be with us in our journey of commitment and fidelity.
Hope
52
The beauty of hope gives us an avenue to
participate in that intervention and help.
53
"Hope consists in asserting that there is at the heart of being, beyond all data, beyond all inventories and all calculations, a mysterious principle which is in connivance with me"
Marcel
54
In Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence, Levinas speaks of ______ as the essential, primary, and fundamental structure of subjectivity
responsibility
55
ordains that the I be responsible for that Other; such is | ordination to goodness.
face of the other
56
When the I recognizes and claims this responsibility as a predetermined morality before ontology, which leads the Ito summon the self to be present, then the responsibility of the Ito the Other will never _______, but a ________
be a return to the self but a continuous responsibility that is always outside of the self.
57
In this situation, the many Other, which Levinas called the ______, is substantially disturbing this intimacy between the land the Other
third
58
Our responsibility's generality obliges us to compare the unique Other with all Others, meaning to say to allow for
equal treatment and calculation.
59
an inescapable and ad infinitum responsibility
The life of others, the being of others, falls to me as a duty: