Chapter 6 Flashcards

Statistics

1
Q

Lying with statistics

A

The intentional misapplication of statistical methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Statistical methodology

A

Justification of the choice of using a particular statistical method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Descriptive statistics

A

In descriptive statistics, one aims to display data and conclusions accurately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Inferential statistics

A

In inferential statistics, one aims to draw a justified conclusion from data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Stochastic hypothesis

A

A hypothesis whose implications come in the form of a probability distribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Deterministic hypothesis

A

A hypothesis all of whose implications are certain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Quantitative measure of measurement error

A

The likelihood of a measurement error being made, presented on a quantitative scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Error based statistics

A

Determining the probability of an observation given that a certain hypothesis is true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Confidence in a hypothesis

A

The subjective estimation of the probability of a hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fisher’s significance testing

A

A method of statistical hypothesis testing developed by Ronald Fisher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Test statistic

A

Any quantity, computed from values in a sample, that is considered for a statistical purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sampling distribution

A

A distribution over the possivle outcomes of the test statistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

p-value

A

The probability of observing an outcome at least as extreme as the observed outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Significance level

A

A conventionally set lever for p-values, below which the associated hypothesis should be rejected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

p-value abuse

A

Changing test setup, statistical method, or sample in order to make the p-value either higher or lower than the significance level (depending on what result is desired)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Neyman-Pearson hypothesis testing

A

A method of hypothesis testing developed by Jerzy Neyman and Karl Pearson

17
Q

Original hypothesis (Hi)

A

Some claim that you are interested in

18
Q

Alternative hypothesis (Ha)

A

A hypothesis that due to logical necessity has to be true if the original hypothesis is false and vice versa. I.e. Ha is the inverse, or negation, of Hi

19
Q

Type I error

A

Wrongly rejecting a true hypothesis Hi

20
Q

Type II error

A

Wrongly accepting a false hypothesis Hi

21
Q

Power of a test

A

The probability of correctly rejecting a false hypothesis Hi

22
Q

Bayesian statistics

A

Posterior probability of a hypothesis is calculated based on the prior probabilities for this hypothesis together with the observed outcome, using Bayes’ theorem

23
Q

Prior probability

A

The (estimated) probability of the hypothesis being true before the application of Bayes’ theorem

24
Q

Subjective degrees of belief

A

The Bayesian view of what is meant by “probability” - that probability is the subjective estimation of likelihood rather than a property belonging to the world

25
Q

Posterior probability

A

The (calculated) probability of the hypothesis being true after the application of Bayes theorem

26
Q

The problem of priors

A

Bayesianism does not offer a clear way to determine prior probabilities

27
Q

The principle principle

A

A subject’s prior probability should be assigned on the basis of objective probability, if it is known

28
Q

The principle of indifference

A

A subject’s prior probabilities should be assigned equally to the possible outcomes, if there is no information about the objective probabilities

29
Q

The problem of slow convergence

A

If two subjects assign sufficiently different prior probabilities to the same hypothesis, it is possible that their respective posterior probabilities will not converge even though Bayes’ theorem has been applied to large amounts of data

30
Q

The problem of old evidence

A

The problem of determining what evidence that has been previously used to determine posterior probabilities

31
Q

The problem of uncertain evidence

A

Bayesianism does not take uncertainty about evidence into account