Chapter 6 Flashcards
Corporate Level Strategy
The strategy that top management formulates for the overall company.
Strategies exist at three levels in any organization: (1) the corporate or firm level, (2) the business unit or competitive level, and (3) the functional or tactical level.
Compete in a single industry
Allows a firm to specialize, but “all eggs are in a single basket.”
Firms operating in a single industry are more susceptible to sharp downturns in business cycles, however.
Compete in related industries (synergy)
Allows a firm to develop synergy among the business units. Synergy occurs when the combination of two organizations results in higher effectiveness and efficiency than would otherwise be generated separately.
Compete in unrelated industries
Minimizes risk through diversification.
Participating in numerous unrelated businesses may result in uncertainties associated with losing touch with the fundamentals of each business.
Growth (1)
Increase in size. Internal growth and external growth
Stability (2)
Retain current size
Retrenchment (3)
Decrease in size. Turnaround, divestment, and liquidation.
Internal Growth
Expanding by internally increasing its size and sales. Is accomplished when a firm increases revenues, production capacity, and its workforce; it can occur by growing an existing business or creating new ones. Internal growth enables a firm to maintain control over the enterprise by adding new products, facilities, or businesses incrementally. Internal growth enables the firm to preserve its corporate culture and image while expanding at a more controlled pace.
External Growth
External growth is accomplished when two firms merge or one acquires the other. A merger occurs when two or more firms, usually of roughly similar sizes, combine into one through an exchange of stock. An acquisition is a form of a merger whereby one firm purchases another, often with a combination of cash and stock. The combined organization possesses all the strengths of the individual firms. When two firms possess complementary resources and cooperate in a friendly acquisition or merger, the results can be positive
Growth stages (internal vs external)
External growth can usually occur more quickly than internal growth, but integrating newly acquired entities into the current organization can be difficult.
The pursuit of external growth can enable a firm to modify its corporate profile.
Growth is not necessarily the best strategic alternative for every healthy organization.
5 growth alternatives
Horizontal (related) Integration Horizontal (related) diversification Conglomerate (unrelated) diversification Vertical integration Strategic Alliances (Partnerships)
Horizontal (related) Integration
A firm that acquires other companies in the same line of business is engaging in horizontal integration. Doing so allows a firm operating in a single industry to grow rapidly without moving into other industries. Desire for increased market share
Horizontal (related) diversification
A firm engages in horizontal related diversification when it acquires a business outside its present scope of operation but with similar or related core competencies, the firm’s key capabilities and collective learning skills that are fundamental to its strategy, performance, and long-term profitability. The purpose of horizontal related diversification is to create synergy by transferring and/or sharing the capabilities among the various business units.
Conglomerate (unrelated) diversification
When a corporation acquires a business in an unrelated industry to reduce cyclical fluctuations in cash flows or revenues, it is pursuing conglomerate (unrelated) diversification. Diversifying into unrelated industries is primarily financially driven
Vertical integration
Vertical integration refers to merging various stages of activities in the distribution channel.
When a firm acquires its suppliers (i.e., expanding “upstream”), it is engaging in backward integration, whereas a firm acquiring its buyers (i.e., expanding “downstream”) is engaging in forward integration.
Pro: Transactions costs between suppliers and buyers may be reduced when the same firm owns both entities.
Con: It raise production costs and reduce efficiency because of the lack of supplier competition