Chapter 5 textbook notes Flashcards
construct validity
how well a studys variables are measured or manipulated
what are the 3 kinds of measures for operationalization?
self-report, observational, and physiological
What equipment can be used for physiological measures?
EMG (facial emg records muscles in the face), fMRI or MRI
How can saliva help us operationalize stress?
measure the amount of the hormone cortisol released in saliva
what do most people believe is the best measure for operationalization?
physiological measures but even these need to be validated using other measures
How many levels must a variable have?
at least 2
What are operational variables classified as?
categorical (nominal) or quantitative (height, weight, etc)
ordinal scale
ranked order; intervals between may be unequal. ex ranking 10 books in a bookstore.
interval scale
Quantitative: intervals are equal distances; there is no true 0. ex: A score of 0 on an IQ test does not mean the person has 0 intelligence. Body temperature in Celsius is another example; a temperature of 0 degrees does not mean no temperature.
Ratio Scale
Quantitative equal intervals, and the value of 0 truly means 0. For example, on an exam, a score of 0 means a 0.
what is the difference betweeen reliability and validity?
reliability refers to how consistent the results fo a measure are and validity refers to whether the operationalization is measuring what it is supposed to measure
test-retest reliability
a participant will get the same score each time they are measured with it
inter-rater reliability
consistent scores are obtained no matter who measures the variable
internal reliability
a participant gives a consistent pattern of answers, no matter how the researchers phrase the question
what are 2 statistical devices researchers can use for data analysis?
scatterplots and correlation coefficient
correlation coefficient
how close the dots or points on a scatterplot are to a line drawn through them
average inter-item correlation
average of all these correlations
Cronbach’s alpha
combines the AIC and the number of items in the scale
what does it mean if the AIC or cronbachs alpha is acceptable?
this means there is good internal reliability and they can sum all the items together.
what does it mean if the AIC and cronbachs alpha are unacceptable?
the researchers look carefully at the items, perhaps revisiting or omitting some
face validity
the extent to which a measure is subjectively considered a plausible operationalization of the conceptual variable
content validity
the extent to which a measure captures all parts of a defined construct
criterion validity
an empirical form of measurement validity that establishes the extent to which a measure is associated with a behavioral outcome, which it should be associated with
known groups paradigm
A method for establishing criterion validity, which a researcher tests 2 or more groups who are known to differ on the variable of interest to ensure they score differently on a measure of that variable