Chapter 5 - Land Dealing: Security Transactions - Charges Flashcards
CHARGES
Overview
1) Introduction
2) What can be charged
3) Powers to charge or grant charges
4) Does charge amount to an interest in the land
5) Difference between charges & mortgage
6) Unregistered charge
7) Equitable mortgage
8) Enforcement of charge by way of order for sale - Registry Title
9) Enforcement of by way of order for sale - Land Office Title
10) Effects of sale
11) Discharge
12) Rights of chargor
13) Sale by private treaty
14) Purchase money
15) Forfeiture of deposit
16) Order for possession
17) Miscellaneous
18) LACA
19) Third party charge
CHARGES
Introduction
R, F, E
1) R: Must be registered - S.206
2) F: Registration in form 14B - S.218
3) E: Charges take effect upon registration - S.243
CHARGES
What can be charged - overview
1) The law
2) Loan transaction
3) Turnkey contracts
4) Part of land
WHAT CAN BE CHARGED
The law
S.241
WHAT CAN BE CHARGED
Loan transaction
R&I Securities v Golden Castle Finance:
- charge can only be created pursuant to a loan transaction
- the essence of charge is to secure repayment of loan.
WHAT CAN BE CHARGED
Turnkey contracts
Hong Kew Holdings (M) Sdn Bhd v Hyundai Heavy Industries:
- S.241 also covers charge created to secure the repayment of instalment payments under a turnkey contracts to construct a building.
WHAT CAN BE CHARGED
Charge on part of the land
J. Raju v Kwong Yik Bank Bhd:
- part of land can only be charged by way of equitable charge;
- equitable charge is incapable of registration.
POWERS TO CHARGE OR GRANT CHARGES
Overview
1) Power to create second charge
2) Power to grant charge to two or more persons
POWERS TO CHARGE OR GRANT CHARGES
Power to create second charge
S.241(2):
- Registered proprietor has the power to create 2nd or subsequent charge.
POWERS TO CHARGE OR GRANT CHARGES
Power to grant charge to two or more persons
S.241(4):
- charges may be granted to two or more persons to bodies as trustees or representative to be held jointly.
WHETHER CHARGES AMOUNT TO INTEREST IN LAND
Overview
1) The law
2) Application
WHETHER CHARGES AMOUNT TO INTEREST IN LAND
The law
Duly registered charge amount to interest in land;
- i.e. S.215(1)(a)
WHETHER CHARGES AMOUNT TO INTEREST IN LAND
Application
Ho Giok Chay v Nik Aishah:
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHARGES & MORTGAGE
The difference
Bank Bumiputra Msia Bhd v Doric Development:
- Charge does not require transfer of ownership of the land;
- Chargee only acquire interest in the land with a statutory right to enforce his security by order for sale.
- Mortgage is recognised under equity & is not contradictory with NLC.
UNREGISTERED CHARGE
Overview
1) Effect - general
2) Effect - application
3) Example
4) Application
UNREGISTERED CHARGE
Effect - general
- amounts to creation of equitable charge;
- enforceable at equity under S.206(3)
UNREGISTERED CHARGE
Effect - application
Oriental Bank v Chup Seng (Restaurant) Butterworth Sdn Bhd:
- Unregistered chargee has no right to enforce charge under NLC;
- This is so unless & until the charge is registered.
UNREGISTERED CHARGE
Example
- Charge instrument not presented for registration;
- Erroneously attested charge.
UNREGISTERED CHARGE
Application
FC, 1984
Mahadevan S/O Mahalingam v Manilal & Sons:
- Equitable charge provides remedy in equity;
- NLC does not prohibit the creation of equitable charges or liens;
- The word “other charge on land” in S.21(1) LA include equitable charges & liens;
- Unregistered charge can be enforced as a contractual agreement by virtue S.206(3).
EQUITABLE MORTGAGE
Overview
1) Recognition of equitable mortgage
2) Enforcement of equitable mortgage
RECOGNITION OF EQUITABLE MORTGAGE
In NLC
Chuah Eng Khong v Malayan Banking Bhd (FC):
- NLC does not have any express provision that renders an equitable mortgage null & void.
RECOGNITION OF EQUITABLE MORTGAGE
By LACA
Phileoallied Bank (M) Bhd v Bupinder Singh a/l Avatar Singh (FC):
- LACA is recognised as an equitable mortgage.
ENFORCEMENT OF EQUITABLE MORTGAGE
When there is no IDT
Phileoallied Bank (M) Bhd v Bupinder Singh a/l Avatar Singh (FC):
- The assignee bank is entitled to enforce & sell the assigned property w/o court order for sale.
- i.e. agreement may be enforced w/o the need to resort to NLC.
ENFORCEMENT OF EQUITABLE MORTGAGE
When IDT is issued subsequently
Damai Freight (M) Sdn Bhd v Affin Bank Bhd:
- lender may proceed to sell the property under the assignment w/o the need to create the charge under NLC & obtain order for sale from the court;
- lender is empowered to realise its security for the loans by way of private sale of the land.
- S.206(3) NLC recognises the contractual operation of any transaction relating to land & interest therein.
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
Overview
1) What is Registry title
2) Letter of demand
3) Statutory notice
4) Application for OFS
5) Cause to contrary
6) Whether LA applies & when does COA arise
7) Computation of time & when does COA arise
8) Fixing new auction date
9) Procedures at sale
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
What is Registry title
S.77
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
Letter of demand
Multi-purpose Bank Bhd v Maimoon Abd Razak:
- LoD is not a pre-requisite;
- There is no requirement to serve LoD before serving a notice.
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
Statutory notice - overview
1) Default of repayment
2) Default on demand
3) Issue on statutory notice
STATUTORY NOTICE
default of repayment - the law
S.254 + Form 16D
STATUTORY NOTICE
default of repayment - sum lumped together
Syarikat Kewangan Melayu Raya v Malayan Banking Bhd:
- notice that cited two sums together is not defective;
- this is so provided that the chargor is not misled or prejudiced by any defect in the notice.
STATUTORY NOTICE
default on demand - the law
S.255 + Form 16E
STATUTORY NOTICE
issue on statutory notice - wrong number of days for breach
BBMB v Hj Mohd Din:
- Such error unless prejudiced to the chargor, is not fatal.
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
Application for an order for sale - overview
1) The law
2) Duty of judge
3) Procedures
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER FOR SALE
The law
S.256
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
Duty of judge
Low Lee Lian v Ban Hin lee Bank:
- the procedure is speedy & summary in nature;
- thus, considerations for judges are:
1) whether chargee has given the appropriate statutory notice;
2) whether procedural requirements under O.83 have been complied with;
3) whether material produce by chargor constitute CTC;
- if he is satisfied with CTC: refuse OFS;
- otherwise: grant OFS.
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
Procedures - overview
1) The law
2) Affidavit requirement
3) Cause to contrary
PROCEDURES OFS REGISTRY TITLE
The law
O.83, r.3
- procedures for charge actions.
PROCEDURES OFS REGISTRY TITLE
Affidavit requirement - the law
O.83, r.3:
- shall quantify the amount repayment & interest;
- shall exhibit the copy the charge;
- shall give particulars the amount due as at the hearing date.
PROCEDURES OFS REGISTRY TITLE
Affidavit requirement - non-compliance
Perwira Habib Bank v Lum Choon Realty Sdn Bhd:
MAJORITY:
- Failure to comply with the requirements of the rule will render the order granted defective & liable to be set aside.
DISSENTING:
- When the order is made, the order shall state the amount due as on the date the order is made.
- Failure to comply with the rule does not render the OFS defective.
PROCEDURES OFS REGISTRY TITLE
CTC - overview
1) How to show CTC
2) CTC in collateral proceedings
PROCEDURES OFS REGISTRY TITLE
CTC - how to show CTC
Low Lee Lian v Ban Hin Lee Bank:
- Show that the charge is defeasible due to one of the grounds under S.340(2) & (4)(b);
- Show that the chargee has failed to meet the conditions precedent for the making of an application for an order for sale, such as failure to make a demand or service of a notice in Form 16D, or that the notice demands sums not lawfully due from the charge;
- example: Co-operative Central Bank v Meng Kuang Properties [1991] 2 CLJ 1144, the court submit that there was a cause to contrary when the notice of demand and form 16D were invalid as they did not disclose the correct amount of money and interest to be claimed.
- Show that the grant OFS would be contrary to the rule of law or equity.
- example: Kuching Plaza Sdn Bhd v Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd [1991] 3 MLJ 163, the application for Order of Sale was set aside by the court as it was against rule of equity because if the Order of Sale was granted, it would cause the unfairness to the other parties who had interest on the land.
PROCEDURES OFS REGISTRY TITLE
CTC - CTC in collateral proceedings
FC, 2014
CIMB Investment Bank Bhd v Metroplex Holdings Sdn Bhd:
- Unless the order is a nullity in Baddiadin sense, CTC could not be raised in collateral proceedings;
- Issue relating to CTC could only be raised in charge action;
- An OFS, unless set aside or appeal against, is a final order.
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
Whether LA applies & when does COA arise
FC, 2020
CIMB Bank Bhd v Sivadevi Sivalingam:
- Default in repayment of loan does not make ‘the right to receive the money accrued’ for the chargee to initiate an action in court for order for sale.
- The chargee must serve on the chargor a notice in Form 16D specifying the breach in question, requiring the chargor to remedy the breach within one month from the date of service of the notice, and warning the chargor that if the notice is not complied with, the chargee will take proceedings to obtain an order for sale.
- Only if, at the expiry of the period specified in the notice in Form 16D, the breach in question has not been remedied, then the ‘whole sum secured by the charge shall become due and payable to the chargee’ & in such a case, limitation period of 12 years will begin to run.
- It is on this date that ‘the right to receive the money accrued’ and the cause of action arises for an action pertaining to order for sale.
- Therefore, even if the Form 16D is issued after the period of 12 years, any Originating Summons filed by the chargee thereafter will not be barred by limitation under s. 21(1) of the Limitation Act.
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
Computation of time & when does COA arise
CA, 2019
Sivadajadatcham P. Sethuram v CIMB Bank Bhd:
- Meaning of 4 clear days: Exclude Sat & Sun.
- When does COA accrue: when chargee approach court for arise.
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
Fixing new auction date
FC, 2020
RHB Bank Bhd v Dato’ Hj Muhammad Hamzah:
- “Action” in S.21 mean fresh actions & exclude procedurally filed applications or executions;
- Therefore it does not apply to fixing new auction date.
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
Procedures at sale - overview
1) The law
2) When is the sale concluded
3) Order for sale made by court
PROCEDURES AT SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
The law
S.257-259
PROCEDURES AT SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
When is the sale concluded
M&J Frozen Food v Siland Sdn Bhd:
- Sale is concluded at the fall of hammer;
- Contract of sale is formed, bidder is not allowed to retract his acceptance;
- Proprietary rights do not pass to the purchaser until registration.
PROCEDURES AT SALE - REGISTRY TITLE
Order for sale
Maimumah Megat Montak v Maybank Finance:
- Order for sale made by court must be in Form 16H;
- Must contain all particulars set out in S.263;
- Compliance is mandatory;
- Failure will render the OFS invalid.
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - LAND OFFICE TITLE
Overview
1) What is LO title
2) Jurisdiction to grant OFS
3) Letter of demand
4) Statutory notice
5) Application for OFS
6) Making OFS
7) Prior to sale
8) Procedures at sale
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGE BY WAY OF ORDER FOR SALE - LAND OFFICE TITLE
What is LO title
S.77