Chapter 3 - Remedies Against Defeasibility of Title Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

REMEDIES AGAINST DEFEASIBILITY OF TITLE

Overview

A

1) Rectification or errors or mistake
2) Claims in personam
3) Claims for damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

RECTIFICATION OF ERROR OR MISTAKE

Overview

A

1) Power of registrar

2) Power of court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

POWER OF REGISTRAR

Overview

A

1) The law
2) Scope of power
3) Who is entitled to be rectifying
4) Test for rectification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

POWER OF REGISTRAR

The law

A

S.380(1)

  • Limited to errors made by the Registry;
  • Does not include errors made by parties or solicitors.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

POWER OF REGISTRAR

Scope of power

A

Mohammad bin Buyong v Pemungut Hasil Tanah, Gombak:

  • Powers are limited to errors made the Registry;
  • It can include errors by Registrar, arising from errors made by third party.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

POWER OF REGISTRAR

Who is entitled to be rectifying

A

Kuah Chiew Ann:

  • Registrar of title, NOT the court.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

POWER OF REGISTRAR

Test for rectification

FC, 2017

A

Malaysian Building Society Berhad v KCSB Konsortium Sdn Bhd:

  • Test to allow for correction is:

1) Whether there has been substantial compliance of the prescribed form;
2) Whether any party has been prejudiced or misled by the error.

  • OTF, rectification is allowed as there is substantial compliance with the procedures & no party is misled or prejudiced by the error.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

POWER OF COURT

Overview

A

1) To rectify - the law
2) To rectify - the scope
3) To rectify - limitation of power
4) To hear appeal - the law
5) To hear appeal - procedures to appeal
6) To hear appeal - power in appeal hearing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

POWER OF COURT

To rectify - the law

A

S.417

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

POWER OF COURT

To rectify - the scope

A

Sungai Biak Tin Mines Ltd v Saw Choo Teng:

  • S.417 allows court to rectify or make consequential orders to give effect to any judgment or order.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

POWER OF COURT

To rectify - limitation of power

A

Hassan bin Seman & Ors v Jusoh bin Awang Chik:

  • Powers cannot be exercised in violation of indefeasibility.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

POWER OF COURT

To hear appeal - the law

A

S.418

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

POWER OF COURT

To hear appeal - procedures to appeal

A

Pengarah Hasil Tanah & Galian WP v Sri Lempah Enterprise:

  • Appeal must be filed within 3 months;
  • Service of originating motion need not be effected within 3 months but follow the normal course of service.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

POWER OF COURT

To hear appeal - power in appeal hearing

A

UMBC Bhd v Pemungut Hasil Tanah Kota Tinggi:

  • Appellate court must examine the relevant substantive law before making order as it thinks just.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

CLAIMS IN PERSONAM

Overview

A

1) What is claim in personam
2) Right to claim in personam
3) Example of application

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

CLAIMS IN PERSONAM

What is claim in personam

A

Krishnadas & Ors v Maniyam:

  • A form of relief that is granted against a person personally.
  • e.g. rectification of contract, mandatory injunction.
17
Q

CLAIMS IN PERSONAM

Right to claim in personam

A

Wong Yew Kwan v Wong Yu Kee:

  • Right in personal arises in equity;
  • For right to arise, the opposite party must act unconscionably.
18
Q

CLAIMS IN PERSONAM

Example of application

A

Oh Hiam & Ors v Tham Kong:

  • Parties mistakenly believe as to the plots of land for cross-purpose;
  • The transaction is void pursuant to doctrine of common mistake;
  • Court ordered for rectification of the agreement as equity operated in personam.
19
Q

CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES

Overview

A

1) The law
2) Scope & application
3) Relief

20
Q

CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES

The law

A

S.206(3)

21
Q

CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES

Scope & application

FC, 2015

A

Damai Freight (M) Sdn Bhd v Affin Bank Bhd

Section 206(3) of the NLC, by providing a liberal application of equity, recognises the contractual operation of any transaction relating to alienated land or any interest therein.

22
Q

CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES

Relief

A

Inter-continental Sdn Bhd v Societe des Elains de bayas Tudjuh:

  • remedy of SP or damages in lieu thereof may be obtained in respect of the agreement.