Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

FPSYCH > Chapter 5: Eyewitness Testimony > Flashcards

Chapter 5: Eyewitness Testimony Flashcards

1
Q

Recall memory

A

Reporting what you remember off the top of your head

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Recognition memory

A

Determining whether the person or thing you saw in the past is the same as what you’re looking at now (ex. multiple choice, choosing the one you recognize)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 5 stages of memory?

A

1) perception/attention
2) encoding stage
3) short-term memory
4) long-term memory
5) retrieval stage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how to study eyewitness research

Archival Data

A

police reports, transcripts, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Naturalistic Observations

(of witnesses)

A

Observe witness in real time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How are lab studies used to do research on eyewitness testimony?

(what is their focus?)

A

Most common is tests relating to memory (ex. showing change blindness videos)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

IND. Estimator Variables

A

variables present at the time of the crime that cannot be changed (ex. age of witness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

IND. System Variables

A

Variables that can be manipulated in order to increase or decrease eyewitness accuracy (ex. the type of lineup used)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 3 general DEP. variables in eyewitness studies?

A
  1. recognition of perp.
  2. recall of perp.
  3. recall of event/crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Open-ended recall/Free narrative

A
  • recount without being prompted
  • TED questions (tell, explain, describe)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Direct question recall

A
  • asked specific questions about the event/crime (ex. what was the colour of their jacket?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the 3 ways recall of info is measured?

A

1) Amount (ex. how many details)
2) Type (ex. important? related? specific?)
3) Accuracy (ex. how many errors when comparing to other answers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 2 ways that witness recognition is measured?

A
  1. Accuracy (rate of correctly identifying the perp in a lineup)
  2. Errors (rate of identifying an innocent person, rate of stating perp isn’t present when they are)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Memory conformity

A

When there are multiple witnesses to a crime, one can be “contaminated” when they know what another witness has said about the crime
- when what one witness reports influences what another witness reports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is it beneficial to mix visual and auditory questions during an interview?

A

No because asking a witness to recall on physical memories and audio memories can get confusing and may impact what is remembered correctly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Loftus and Palmer (1974) discover?

A

A witness recall report can be altered by the phrasing of the question being asked
- studies on “smashed” vs. “hit” cars (ex. the people who were asked questions using “smashed” reported that the car was going faster than the people who were asked “hit” questions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Misinformation Effect/ Post-Event Information Effect

A

If a witness is given false information about the event after it has happened, they are more likely to incorporate that misinformation into their recall of the event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Misinformation Acceptance Hypothesis

A
  • witness trying to please the questioner
  • guessing which answer they think the questioner wants to hear
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Source Misattribution Hypothesis

A

witnesses remember their accurate and inaccurate memories of the event but can’t remember which one is which

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Memory Impairment Hypothesis

A

Original memory gets overwritten by a new memory that is likely influenced by leading questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Why is it thought that hypnosis can improve eyewitness recall?

A

Idea that a hypnotized person may be able to retrieve more details about an event from their subconscious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What’s an issue with using hypnosis in an interview?

A

Hypnotized people are highly suggestible and are usually equally confident in their accurate and inaccurate info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Is hypnosis allowed in canadian courts?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Cognitive Interview

A

an interview based on the principles of memory storage and retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are 4 memory retrieval techniques used in a cognitive interview?

A
  1. reinstating context
  2. reporting everything
  3. recall event in a different order
  4. changing perspective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Enhanced Cognitive Interview

A

includes principles of social dynamics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Enhanced Cognitive Interview

Rapport building

A

Officer should spend time with witness and make them feel comfortable

28
Q

Enhanced Cognitive Interview

Supportive interviewer behaviour

Cognitive Interview + principles of social dynamics

A

officer shouldn’t interrupt free-recall and should pay attention to the witness

29
Q

Enhanced Cognitive Interview

Transfer of control

A

since the witness is the person who saw the crime, they should be in charge of the flow of the interview

30
Q

Enhanced Cognitive Interview

Focused retrieval

Cognitive Interview + principles of social dynamics

A

questions should be open-ended, not leading or suggestive
- officer should use focused memory techniques

31
Q

Enhanced Cognitive Interview

Witness compatible questioning

A

officer’s questions should match with what the witness is talking about (ex. witness talking about clothing=questions about clothing)

32
Q

What are some common descriptions of perpetrators that are typically accurate?

(three)

A

gender, hair colour, hair style

33
Q

What are some common descriptions of perpetrators that are typically inaccurate?

(three)

A

weight, eye colour, shoes

34
Q

What’s the difference between a suspect and a perpetrator?

A

Suspect is the person in question but they could be innocent or guilty
Perpetrator is the person who did it 100%

35
Q

What is considered a “fair lineup”?

A

One where the suspect doesn’t stand out (the foils look like them too)

36
Q

What are some reasons that police choose to use a photo lineup vs. a live lineup?

(four)

A
  • faster and easier to construct, portable
  • behaviour of suspects don’t interfere
  • suspect doesn’t have the right to counsel (doesn’t need to be told their rights because they aren’t there)
  • witness may be less anxious looking at photos than standing in front of people
37
Q

Simultaneous Lineup
- what kind of judgement does it rely on?

A

All lineup members presented at the same time
- good for relative judgement

38
Q

Relative Judgement

A

witness compares lineup members with each other and decides which one looks most like the perp.

39
Q

What are Sequential lineups?
What kind of judgement do they rely on?

A

Witness shown one suspect and asked to make a decision before being shown the next suspect
- reduces the use of relative judgement because the witness can’t ask to see a suspect twice
- good for absolute judgement

40
Q

Are children more effective when shown a simultaneous lineup or a sequential lineup? Adults?

A

Children: more effective = simultaneous/elimination lineup
Adults: more effective = sequential lineups

41
Q

Absolute Judgement

(in identification procedures)

A

Witness compares the suspect with their memory of the perp instead of comparing them to the other suspects

42
Q

1) What is a showup?
2) What kind of judgement is likely to occur?
3) What is a problem with this kind of lineup?

A

1) Suspect is shown to witness
2) absolute judgement
3) the witness knows who the police think the suspect is so their response may be biased (showups are suggestive)

43
Q

What is a walk-by?

(identification prodedure)

A

Witness is taken to a public place where the suspect is likely to be
Asked to report when they think they see the perp.

44
Q

What is a biased lineup?

A

A lineup that is suggestive as to who the suspect is

45
Q

What are 3 common biases that increase the risk of false identification in lineup procedures?
- What is the major concern?

A

1) Foil bias
2) Clothing bias
3) Instruction bias
- false positives/identification

46
Q

Foil Bias

(in lineups)

A
  • only one person in the lineup that has similar features (ex. only one red head)
47
Q

1) What is Clothing Bias?
2) How can it be avoided?

(in lineups)

A

1) only one person wearing the specific clothing described to police
2) either everyone needs the same clothing or no one has it

48
Q

Instruction Bias (most important)

(in lineups)

A

The police don’t tell the witness that the perp may not be present and that they don’t have to choose someone if they don’t feel it is anyone
- this avoids the witness choosing someone because they feel they have to

49
Q

Voice Identification: What are some factors that increase accuracy?

(2 points)

A
  • longer voice samples
  • similar accent to witness
50
Q

Voice Identification: What are some factors that decrease accuracy?

(5 points)

A
  • whispering, muffling
  • change in tone
  • threatening messages
  • more foils (too many to remember and compare)
  • target’s voice occurs later in the lineup
51
Q

Does confident = correct?

A

confident witnesses aren’t more accurate in their memory

52
Q

Estimator Variable: Age

Are older adults and younger adults equally as accurate in identification procedures?

A

Older adults are less accurate
- memory, vision, etc.

53
Q

Estimator Variable: Race

Cross-Race Effect

(identification procedures)

A

Higher accuracy when target is the same race as witness
(not a lot of empirical evidence)

54
Q

What are the 3 explanations of the cross-race effect/other-race effect

A

1) ATTITUDES
people with racist views may be less inclined to distinguish among members of other races
research suggests that this may not be about attitude but more about how much contact someone typically has with other races (if they’re racist)
2) PHYSIOGNOMIC HOMOGENEITY
some races have less variability in their faces “they all look the same”
lacks empirical evidence
3) INTERRACIAL CONTACT
suggests that the more time you spend with other races, the better you will be at identifying them
has the most evidence to back it up but still not certain

55
Q

What does the weapon focus phenomenon suggest?

A

The witness may not remember as many details about a crime when there is a weapon present

56
Q

Estimator Variable: Presence of a weapon

Cue-Utilization Hypothesis

A

Theory that emotional arrousal increases in the presense of a weapon
- attentional arrousal decreases (less details noticed)

57
Q

Estimator Variable: Presence of a weapon

Unusualness Hypothesis

A

Theory that less details are encoded because weapons are unusual and unexpexted
- witness focuses more on weapon because they’re surprised (exogenous cue)
- when something is unexpected, it’s harder to remember details because you weren’t prepared to pay attention

58
Q

What are the 4 guidelines for improvement in eyewitness evidence in the US?

A

1) person conducting lineup shouldn’t know who the suspect is
2) witesses told suspect/perp may not be in the lineup
3) suspect shouldn’t stand out
4) witnesses confidence assessed prior to feedback

59
Q

What did Kassin add to eyewitness evidence guidelines?

A

lineups should be recorded and taped

60
Q

What are the 4 additional guidelines for improvement in eyewitness evidence in Canada?

A

1) photo lineups videotaped
2) tell witnesses it’s just as important to identify innocent suspects (elimination)
3) sequential lineups
4) officers should not provide feedback

61
Q

Approximately _ percent of wrongful conviction cases (exonerated through DNA evidence) have been attributed to eyewitness identification
a) 50
b) 10-20
c) 75
d) 25

A

c) 75

62
Q

Which Canadian case involving poor police techniques in collecting eyewitness evidence resulted in a set of recommendations for conducting lineup identifications?
a) R. v. Reno
b) Neil v. Biggers
c) R. v. Brooks
d) R. v. Sophonow

A

d) R. v. Sophonow
Wrongful conviction of woman strangled in a donut shop

63
Q

Factors affecting encoding

Attentional Saturation

A
  • so much going on all the time so we generalize it because we can’t encode it all
  • may miss details but can still recognize familiarity
64
Q

What factors may affect encoding?

A

attention, unexpectedness, witness involvement, stress level of witness, state of witness (tired, under the influence, etc.)

65
Q

What factors may affect retrieval?

(six)

A
  • inferences (people guess)
  • stereotypes (fill in gaps)
  • biases influence memory
  • scripts/schemas (typical vs. actual info)
  • emotional factors (ex. anxiety blocks retrieval)
  • context effects (cues trigger memories)

FPSYCH (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions