Chapter 5 - Excessive Sum in Bankruptcy Notice Flashcards
1
Q
EXCESSIVE SUM IN BN
Overview
A
1) General rule
2) Time & how to challenge
3) Interest on judgment
4) Understatement of interest
2
Q
EXCESSIVE SUM IN BN
General Rule
A
1) S.3(2)(ii):
- BN shall not be invalidated by reason only that the sum specified exceeds the amount actually due.
2) Re Loh Kok Hua ex p Ban Hin Lee Bank:
- BN shall not be invalidated merely because the sum in BN exceeds the amount actually due;
- JD cannot raise such issue, unless he gives notice disputing the validity of BN on the ground of such error within 7 days of service of BN.
3
Q
EXCESSIVE SUM IN BN
Time & how to challenge
A
Chin Sin Lian v Delta Finance Bhd:
- Debtor shall challenge it at BN stage;
- It can be done by giving notice to the creditor within 7 days of service of BN.
4
Q
EXCESSIVE SUM IN BN
Interest on judgment
A
Moscow Narodny Bank Ltd v Ngan Ching Wen:
- interest of more than 6 years cannot be claimed;
- 6 years is calculated from the date of judgment.
5
Q
EXCESSIVE SUM IN BN
Understatement of interest
A
Re KV Sathasivam ex p Phileo Allied Bank (Malaysia) Bhd:
- The understatement of interest could not have embarassed the JD;
- The BN made it clear on what was required to be paid.
- Therefore, the BN is not invalidated.
6
Q
EXCESSIVE SUM IN BN
Recent Application
HC, 2020
A
RE CHUA LIANG HONG; EX P: KUALA EXCEL SDN BHD
- An error in the amount stated in a bankruptcy notice should be treated as a minor error and should be cured by a simple amendment made thereto.
- OTF, the overstated amount is small, remaining amount due is still over the statutory amount & JD was well aware of the error.
- since it cannot mislead, prejudice or cause any injustice to the judgment debtor, the bankruptcy notice cannot be invalidated on the ground of such error per se.