Chapter 18 - Opposing Winding Up Petition Flashcards
FIGHTING WINDING UP PETITION
Overview
1) Opposing by Fortuna Injunction
2) Opposing at hearing
3) Grounds to oppose at hearing
4) Powers of court at hearing
OPPOSING BY FORTUNA INJUNCTION
Overview
1) What & effect of Fortuna Injunction
2) Grounds of Fortuna injunction
3) When will Fortuna injunction be granted
4) Application
OPPOSING BY FORTUNA INJUNCTION
What is Fortuna injunction & effect of Fortuna injunction
- A Fortuna Injunction is a specific order by the Court directing that the creditor be restrained from presenting a winding-up petition against the company.
- If successful, the company would be able to prevent the creditor from commencing winding-up proceedings against it
OPPOSING BY FORTUNA INJUNCTION
Grounds for Fortuna injunction
Fortuna Holdings Pty Ltd v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation:
- there are two grounds in which a company can be granted a Fortuna Injunction:
1) 1st ground: where the winding-up petition, if presented, has no chance of success or is bound to fail; or
2) 2nd ground: the creditor is intending to present a winding-up petition on a disputed claim, which will produce irreparable damage to the Company, rather than by a suitable alternative procedure.
OPPOSING BY FORTUNA INJUNCTION
When will Fortuna injunction be granted
Fortuna Holdings Pty Ltd v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation:
- a Fortuna Injunction will be granted when the Notice is based on a clearly disputed debt.
- This is because the proper alternative in such cases would be for the creditor to commence a civil suit and obtain a judgment before attempting to wind-up the company.
- Therefore, a Notice based on a disputed debt may be seen as an attempt to coerce a company into paying the amount which may be an abuse of process of the Court.
OPPOSING BY FORTUNA INJUNCTION
Application - bona fide dispute of the debt
CA, 2007
Mobikom Sdn Bhd v. Inmiss Communications Sdn Bhd:
- a party may be restrained from presenting a winding-up petition if it is found, for example that there is a bona fide dispute about the debt on which the notice of demand issued under [section 466] of the Companies Act is based.
OPPOSING BY FORTUNA INJUNCTION
Application - what must be shown by applicant
2007
Tan Kok Tong v. Hoe Hong Trading Co Sdn Bhd:
- when deciding whether to grant an injunction to restrain a petition that is based on a statutory demand for a debt, the court must be satisfied that the debt is bona fide disputed on substantial grounds
OPPOSING AT HEARING
Overview
1) General opposing at hearing
2) Grounds to oppose at hearing
OPPOSING AT HEARING
General oppossing
- where the company opposes the winding-up petition during the hearing, they must establish that the debt is “bona fide” disputed.
- The company would need to file affidavits in reply and written submissions in opposing a winding-up petition through a hearing.
- The Company would also need to exhibit proper evidence and documents to prove that there is a substantial dispute over the debt which should have been properly litigated first instead of going through the winding-up route.
GROUNDS TO OPPOSE AT HEARING
Overview
1) Amount claimed exceeded amount actually due
2) Failure to specify limb at intitulement
3) Bad service
4) Failure to quantify interest
5) Defective affidavit
6) Defective advertisement
GROUNDS TO OPPOSE AT HEARING
Amount claimed exceeded amount actually due
Wangsini Sdn Bhd v Grand United Holdings Bhd
cf.
YPJE Consultancy Service Sdn Bhd v Heller Factoring (M) SB
See: STATUTORY NOTICE
GROUNDS TO OPPOSE AT HEARING
Failure to specify limb at intitulement
Wong Thai Kuai & Anor v. Kansas Corporation Sdn Bhd
cf.
RHB Bank Bhd v Wembley Industries Holdings Bhd
See: STATUTORY NOTICE
GROUNDS TO OPPOSE AT HEARING
Bad service
S.466(1)(a)
r.18 Companies WUR
See: STATUTORY NOTICE
GROUNDS TO OPPOSE AT HEARING
Failure to quantify interest
Malaysia Air Charter Co SB v Petronas
cf.
Wangsini Sdn Bhd v Grand United Holdings Bhd
See: STATUTORY NOTICE
GROUNDS TO OPPOSE AT HEARING
Defective affidavit
YPJE Consultancy Service Sdn Bhd v Heller Factoring (M) Sdn Bhd;
cf.
Pontian United Theatre Sdn Bhd v Southern Finance Berhad
See: WINDING UP PETITION