Chapter 5 Flashcards

1
Q

Takeover of Stresseman and priorities

A

In August 1923, at the height of the hyperinflation crisis, the government of Cuno collapsed and was replaced by a new coalition led by Gustav Stresemann. Stresemann’s coalition - the so-called ‘great coalition’ - was the first in the short history of the Weimar Republic to include parties from both the left and the right. Stresemann’s own party, the DVP, shared power with the Centre Party, the Socialists and the DDP. Stresemann, who was Chancellor for a mere 103 days, took office at a time when the Weimar Republic was in serious political and economic difficulty. By the time he left office in November, the currency had been stabilised, inflation had been brought under control and attempts to overthrow the republic from both the left and the right had ended in failure.
Stresemann’s priority was to bring inflation under control. This involved three key steps.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Three steps by Stresseman to keep inflation under control

A

The end of passive resistance
The issuing of a new currency
Balancing the budget

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The end of passive resistance

A

Passive resistance against the occupation of the Ruhr was called off in
September. This was a highly unpopular and risky move, which led to serious unrest and the attempted Beer Hall Putsch in Munich. Stresemann calculated, however, that he had no alternative. Germany’s economy was beginning to grind to a halt and inflation was completely out of control. Ending passive resistance, which meant that the government stopped paying workers who refused to work for the French, was an essential first step towards reducing government expenditure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The issuing of a new currency

A

In November, a new currency called the Rentenmark was introduced to replace the old and worthless Reichsmark. The new currency was exchanged for the old on the basis of one Rentenmark for one trillion old marks. Since Germany did not have sufficient gold reserves to back the new currency, it was supported by a mortgage on all industrial and agricultural land. Once the new currency was successfully launched, the government kept tight control over the amount of money in circulation in order to prevent inflation reappearing.
The old inflated marks were gradually cashed in and, in August 1924, the Rentenmark became the Reichsmark, backed by the German gold reserve, which had to be maintained at 30 per cent of the value of the Reichsmarks in circulation. Inflation ceased to be a problem and the value of the new currency was established at home and abroad. All this happened under the direction of Hialmar Schacht.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Effect of Stresseman’s measures

A

These changes made a considerable difference to the way that the German
KEY PROFILE
economy operated. Well-managed companies that were run prudently and were careful not to build up excessive debt continued to prosper. Weaker companies that were heavily reliant on credit crumbled. The number of companies that went bankrupt in Germany rose from 233 in 1923 to over 6000 in 1924. Moreover, those who had lost their savings in the collapse of the old currency did not gain anything from the introduction of a new currency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Stat on increased bankruptcies

A

The number of companies that went bankrupt in Germany rose from 233 in 1923 to over 6000 in 1924.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who was Hjalmar Schact?

A

Hjalmar Schacht (1877-1970) had been director of the National Bank from 1916 and was a co-founder of the DDP party in November
1918. He has been described as a financial genius for his role in the stabilisation of the German currency. In 1923, he became Reich Currency Commissioner and head of the Reichsbank, and introduced the Rentenmark. He then went on to help negotiate the Dawes and Young Plans, which modified Germany’s reparations payments. He later became Economics Minister under the Nazis (1934-37) but lost favour and was removed from the Reichsbank in 1939.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Background to Dawes Plan

A

The stabilisation of Germany’s economy was as much dependent on settling the reparations dispute as it was on domestic issues. In November 1923, Stresemann asked the Allies’ Reparations Committee to set up a committee of financial experts to address Germany’s repayment concerns. The USA had a vested interest in getting Germany back to a position where reparations could be made to France, because much of this money was then passed on to the USA to repay loans. Therefore, the American banker Charles Dawes acted as the new committee’s chairman. By the time the Dawes Plan was finalised in April 1924, Stresemann’s government had fallen, but he remained as foreign secretary and took credit for much of what was achieved. Although the Dawes Plan confirmed the original figure of a total reparations payment of £6.6 billion (132,000 million gold marks), it made the payments more manageable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the Dawes Plan recommend?

A

It recommended that:
• The amount paid each year by Germany should be reduced until 1929, when the situation would be reappraised. It proposed that Germany should re-start reparations by paying 1000 million marks (a fraction of what had been expected before and that this sum should be raised by annual increments over five years by 2500 million marks per year. After this, the sum paid should be related to German industrial performance.
• Germany should receive a large loan of 800 million marks from the USA to help get the plan started and to allow for heavy investment in German infrastructure.

Allies to take control of German banks and railways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who was Charles Dawes?

A

Charles Dawes (1865-1951) was an American banker and politician. He became the US Vice-President in 1924. For his work with Stresemann to resolve the reparations issue, the two men were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1925.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reichstag reaction to Dawes Plan

A

There was a heated debate in the Reichstag over the Dawes Plan. Stresemann himself did not actually believe in the plan, privately referring to it as no more than an economic armistice, but he agreed to it as a way of securing foreign loans. The so-called ‘national opposition’ (mainly the DNVP, but also smaller right-wing groups like the Nazi movement) bitterly attacked this policy of compromise, since they believed Germany should defy the unjust Versailles Treaty and refuse to pay reparations altogether. However, the Dawes Plan was eventually agreed and accepted by both Germany and the Allies in July 1924

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Benefits of Dawes Plan to Reichstag

A

It brought several benefits to Germany:
• The Allies accepted that Germany’s problems with the payment of reparations were real.
• Loans were granted, with which new machinery, factories, houses and jobs could be provided and the German economy rebuilt.

The French gradually left the Ruhr during 1924-25, once it became clear that Germany was going to restart paying reparations and the occupation could no longer be justified. Such measures contributed to German optimism that their country was once again its own master.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Extent of general industrial recovery

A

BY 1925, Germany appeared more stable and prosperous. The combination of the new currency, the Dawes Plan and Schacht’s work at the Reichsbank (where interest rates were kept high to attract foreign investment), helped improve Germany’s situation enormously. American loans helped stimulate the economy. Industrial output grew after 1924 but did not reach 1913 levels until 1929. The extent of this boom should not be exaggerated. Growth rates were unsteady. The years 1924-25 and 1927 were good years, but the economy shrank in 1928 and 1929. Investment in new machinery and factories was falling by 1929.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rationalisation of German industry

A

German industry underwent extensive ‘rationalisation’ as new management and production techniques were introduced
Coal produ
and antiquated equipment was replaced with new machinery.
The fact that Germany had to hand over many of its materials as reparations at the end of the war opened the way for this new start and, with American finance, the big industrialists began to buy out or make cooperative agreements with smaller firms to form cartels.
By 1925, there were around 3000 such cartel arrangements in operation, including 90 per cent of Germany’s coal and steel production. After 1925, Germany was allowed, under the terms of the Versailles Treaty, to protect its industries by introducing tariffs
on imported foreign goods. Many firms also received state subsidies to enable them to survive. All of these practices reduced competition and propped up inefficient enterprises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rise in living standards

A

Advances were made in the chemical industry, such as the large-scale production of artificial fertilisers. The car and aeroplane industries also developed, although cars were still too expensive for the average German. The inflation rate was close to zero and living standards rose as wages began to increase from 1924. Loans helped to finance the building of housing, schools, municipal buildings, road and public works. Massive population growth had created an acute housing shortage in Germany by the early twentieth century, and the overcrowding and insanitary conditions of working-class city accommodation had been linked to political instability. Consequently, state initiatives to provide affordable homes were of great importance for future stability. In 1925, 178,930 dwellings were built - over 70,000 more than in the previous year - and, in 1926, there were to be 205,793 more new homes.
Money was spent on welfare payments and health improvements and, in 1924 new schemes of relief were launched.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Number of strikes in Germany
1924-1930

A

Year
1924:1973
1925:1708
1926:351
1927:844
1928:739
1929:429
1930:353

17
Q

What was Economic armistice?

A

typically in a conflict situation, an armistice is a temporary agreement to suspend action; a truce (Stresemann believed that the Dawes Plan was no more than a temporary agreement on the reparations issue and not a final solution)

18
Q

Areas that benefitted

A

-Wages
-Living standards
-Welfare
-Advances in industry
-Boost in production and industry
-Inflation/prices down

19
Q

Areas that didn’t benefit

A

-Unemployment
-Specific groups ( )
-Agriculture

20
Q

Strike action

A

The number of strikes in German industry declined in these years, partly
KEY TERM
Compulsory arbitration: industrial disputes are often settled by arbitration, in which both sides agree to allow an independent figure, known as the arbitrator, decide on a solution; in Weimar Germany, arbitration was made compulsory by law
Lock out: an action by an employer to stop workers doing their jobs until they agree to the employer’s terms and conditions
because a new system of compulsory arbitration for settling industrial disputes was issued. However, employers felt that this system was biased in favour of the unions and resented the states interference in their affairs. The Weimar Republic had already set a maximum of eight hours for a working day and had given trade unions the right to be part of work councils in factories and mines.

21
Q

Wage increases for workers

A

There were undoubtedly improvements in living standards for ordinary German workers, especially those who were backed by powerful trade unions. They benefited from increases in the real value of wages in each vear after 1924. In 1927, real wages increased by 9 per cent and, in 1928, they rose by a further 12 per cent.

22
Q

1925 wage dispute

A

In 1928, a dispute over wages in the iron and steel industry in the Ruhr resulted in the arbitrator granting a small wage increase to the workers. The employers then refused to pay the increase and locked out the workers for four weeks. In this dispute the workers were backed by the government and paid by the state.

23
Q

What was a cartel?

A

groups of companies in the same industries, which combined together to fix prices and protect profits; cartels reduced competition but allowed more of the profits to be reinvested, for example, in research

24
Q

What was a tariff?

A

duties or taxes that have to be paid on goods entering a country; their purpose is to make foreign goods more expensive than those produced in the country, thereby protecting firms from foreign competition

25
Q

Continuing problem of unemployment

A

In a speech given shortly before his death in 1929, Gustav Stresemann warned, The economic position is only flourishing on the surface. Germany is dancing on a volcano. If the short-term loans are called in, a large section of our economy would collapse? Unemployment was a continuing problem in these years. By the end of 1925, unemployment had reached one million; by March 1926, it was over three million, although it did fall after that. This was due partly to there being more people seeking work, partly to public spending cuts, but also to companies reducing their workforces in order to make efficiency savings. The mining companies reduced their workforces by 136,000 between 1922 and 1925, and reduced them by another 56,000 between 1925 and 1929.

26
Q

Which groups did not benefit from the ‘economic miracle’?

A

The Weimar economic miracle did not benefit everyone. The Mittelstand, the professional middle classes, gained very little in this so-called golden age.
Bankrupted by the hyperinflation of 1923, middle-class managers, clerks and bureaucrats did not benefit fully from the improved economic climate. White-collar workers did not enjoy the wage rises of the industrial sector. By the late 1920s, industrial sector wages had drawn level with those of the middle class and in some cases exceeded them.

27
Q

Unemployment in Germany 1925-29

A

1925:3.4%
1926:10%
1927:6.2%
1928:6.3%
1929:8.5%

28
Q

How much did farmers benefit from the ‘economic miracle’?

A

Farmers gained very little beneft from the economic recovery of these years.
A worldwide agricultural depression kept food prices low and few farmers were able to make a profit on their land. During the inflation of the early 1920s, large landowners and farmers borrowed money to buy new machinery and improve their farms. Smaller peasant farmers, however, tended to hoard money and their savings were wiped out by inflation.

29
Q

Gov measures to help farmers and success

A

After 1923, the government made it easier for farmers to borrow money,
but this made matters worse. Farmers became saddled with debt at a time when prices were falling and they could not, therefore, keep up the repayments. The increased taxes introduced to pay for the welfare benefits of the unemployed and sick were regarded as an unfair burden on farmers and landowners. The governments of these years tried to relieve the farmers’ plight by introducing high import tariffs on food products, import controls and subsidies to farmers, but these measures did not go far enough.

30
Q

How did the situation for farmers get worse later on?

A

The plight of German farmers worsened due to a global grain surplus and price slump in 1925 and 1926. By the late 1920s, there was an increase in
bankruptcies amongst farmers and many of them lost their land as the banks demanded repayment of loans. In 1928, farmers initiated a series of small-scale riots - known as the ‘farmers’ revenge - in protest against foreclosures and low market prices. By 1929, German agricultural production was at less than three-quarters of its pre-war levels.

31
Q

The farmers and the banks

A

When farmers borrowed from banks, they had to use their farms as security for the loans. When those farmers were unable to repay the loans, the banks ‘foreclosed on the contract - the banks took over the farms and evicted the farmers.

32
Q

Agricultural production in 1929

A

By 1929, German agricultural production was at less than three-quarters of its pre-war levels.

33
Q

Who was Owen D Young?

A

Owen D. Young (1874-1962)
was a lawyer by profession but became a leading businessman. He was President of General Electric and founded RCA - the Radio Corporation of America. He helped in the writing of the Dawes Plan in 1924.

34
Q

Background to the Young Plan

A

The Dawes Plan of 1924 was only ever intended to be a temporary settlement of the reparations issue. Although the French and Belgians left the Ruhr by 1925, Allied forces remained in occupation of the Rhineland and the French would not agree to withdraw these forces unless and until a final settlement of the reparations issue had been agreed. Therefore Stresemann, who had continued to serve as Foreign Minister after his own coalition government collapsed, agreed that the issue should be considered by an international committee headed by the American businessman Owen Young. This committee met in Paris in 1929, with Schacht as one of Germany’s representatives, and produced a report on the final settlement of the reparations issue.

35
Q

What did the Young Plan entail?

A

The Young Plan obliged Germany to continue paying reparations until
1988. The total reparations bill was considerably reduced, with Germany being required to pay €1.8 billion instead of the original sum of £6.5 billion, but the annual payment Germany was required to make increased. All foreign control over reparations was ended and the responsibility for paying reparations was placed solely on the German government. In return, Britain and France agreed to withdraw all their troops from the Rhineland by June 1930.

36
Q

Nationalist reaction to the Young Plan

A

Despite containing a number of concessions to Germany, the Young Plan nevertheless inflamed nationalist opinion in Germany. The new leader of the right-wing DNVP, Alfred Hugenberg, launched a nationwide campaign against the plan, which involved other conservative groups, including Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. This campaign group drew up the draft of a law - the so-called ‘freedom law - which they demanded should be submitted to a national referendum. This law required the government to repudiate the war guilt clause of the Treaty of Versailles, to demand immediate evacuation of the occupied areas and declared that any minister who signed a treaty that involved acceptance of war guilt would be tried for treason. Hugenberg’s group launched a petition in support of their freedom law and attracted 4,135,000 signatures. This was enough to ensure that it would have to be debated by the Reichstag and put to a referendum.

37
Q

What happened with the Freedom Law?

A

In the Reichstag debate, the ‘freedom law was decisively defeated and it was also rejected in the referendum. On the other hand, the fact that 5,825,000, or 13.8 per cent of the electorate, voted for the ‘freedom Law was an indication of the depth of support for right-wing nationalism. Moreover, Adolf Hitler’s leading role in the campaign, which was financed by Hugenberg, enabled him to make a decisive breakthrough as a national political figure.

38
Q

Who was Alfred Hugenberg?

A

Alfred Hugenberg (1865-1951) had been a civil servant and then a banker before the war. He owned newspapers and film companies as well as being a deputy in the Reichstag, representing the conservative
DNVP. After he became leader of the DNVP in 1928, the party became more extreme in its hostility to democratic government, and his money and media influence provided crucial support for the campaign against the Young Plan. In 1933, Hugenberg was appointed Minister for Economics and Food in the Nazi government.

39
Q

Summary

A

After the trauma of hyperinflation in 1923, the German economy became more stable in the years 1924-29. Inflation was brought under control with the issue of a new currency, and diplomatic efforts to resolve the reparations issue helped Germany to attract foreign loans to help rebuild the economy.
Parts of German industry boomed during these years and many Germans experienced growing prosperity. This was not, however, the experience of all Germans. Farmers faced very difficult trading conditions and many of them lost their livelihoods. The Mittelstand, particularly white-collar workers, found that their living standards did not improve and they did not have access to the range of welfare benefits available to industrial workers. Moreover, reliance on short-term foreign loans to finance industrial investment left Germany highly vulnerable to changes in the world economic climate.