chapter 5 Flashcards
what are the prefrontal regions of the brain known for
-Associated with extracting meaning from pictures and sentences
-Left prefrontal: verbal material
-Right prefrontal: visual material
what do the the posterior regions of the temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes aid in
Categorical information
explain the memory for meaning vs. memory for exact wording study with the different sentences
Participants warned/not warned about exact wording memory test (Wanner, 1968), if people knew they would literally be asked about the wording later on
-Measured ability to remember meaning versus style of the sentence and effect of warning participants
-People tend to do the best when they can extract the underlying meaning behind words or what is going on, however we still have an impressive ability to understand details
-Giving people instructions, trying to see if people would remember meaning of instructions or exact meaning of instructions
Four groups with different instructions
-When you score your results, do nothing to correct your answers but mark carefully those answers which are wrong
-When you score your results, do nothing to correct your answers, but carefully mark those answer which are wrong
-When you score your results, do nothing to your correct answers but mark carefully those answers which are wrong
-When you scores your results, do nothing to your correct answers but carefully mark those answers which are wrong
The words “mark carefully” it does not matter what order they are in, it means the same thing
-“Correct your answers” vs. “your correct answers” mean slightly different things
-People were then asked to recall exactly what they read, people were either warned or not warned that they would have to do this
Results
-Memory is better for changes of meaning than for changes of style.
-Better memory for the correct your answers piece
-Memory for meaning is equally good whether people are warned or not.
-Warning did have an effect on memory for the stylistic change.
Interaction
-Memory for meaning is always good whether people are warned or not, memory for the wording is not good when people are unwarned, but gets better when people are warned (still never as good as meaning, because meaning is something that seems to matter)
early experiment for memory of visual information and the similar study in the future
SHEPARD (1967): EARLY EXPERIMENT
-Compared memory for pictures with memory for verbal material
-Found memory for verbal information good; memory for visual information nearly perfect
BRADY AND COLLEAGUES (2008)
-Demonstrated capacity for remembering pictures
-2500 pictures, 87.5% accuracy
explain the penny study that shows visual memory isnt always perfect
Penny study
-Participants were shown pictures of pennies and had to determine which one was the real penny
-Participants struggle to determine the actual image, people have held pennies and looked at them many times in their lives, but have never really paid attention to the actual image on the penny because it does not change the meaning of the penny, we do not remember things that do not matter
explain memory for the meaning of a picture study with the teacher in the classroom
-Participants studied pictures of scenes
-Type change versus token change
-Subjects are sensitive to meaning-significant changes in a picture.
-The meaning of a picture is more memorable than style.
-Participants were shown two pictures and then had to point out the differences between that one and the second one they were shown
-Cannot notice when the teacher has different pants, but do notice when the map is showing something different because the teacher is teaching something different
explain the laundry video and how it relates to meaningful memory
-Memory for “not meaningful” information
-To the extent to what we are encoding is meaningful to us, the better we are able to remember it
-Video about the laundry
explain faces vs snowflakes study
-Memory for faces versus snowflakes
-People have good memory for faces, snowflakes are similar to faces in that they tend to be unique and all look different from one another, but there is no meaning to how they look
-With faces you will make meaning, oh they look like me
explain the meaningful words vs abstract picture study
-Recognition memory for meaningful words versus abstract pictures
-When people had to try and remember abstract pictures they were not able to do it
explain the droodle study
Memory for Pictures Tied to their Interpretation
BOWER, KARLIN, AND DUECK (1975)
Subjects studied and recreated “droodles” with or without an explanation of their meaning, would then later ask participants to recreate these pictures
-(a) A midget playing a trombone in a telephone booth. (b) An early bird that caught a very strong worm (pictures were abstract but these were meaningful explanations)
-When people were given explanations for the pictures they were better able to draw the pictures
what are the two systems for propositional representations
amodal symbol system vs. perceptual symbol system
what is the amodal symbol system
-Elements within the system are inherently non-perceptual.
-Ex. Skeleton in class; What is stored is inherently not a picture of the skeleton in the class, it is an abstract representation and you can turn it into a picture or turn it into words
what is the perceptual symbol system
All information is represented in terms that are modality specific and basically perceptual.
-When you recall the skeleton later tonight, you have actually seen the skeleton, and that is what is stored in your brain, a visual representation of it, you can still convert it into other things
where did perceptual symbol system come from
DUAL-CODE THEORY (Paivio, 1971, 1986)
-Information is represented in combined verbal and visual codes.
-This is where perceptual symbol system came from, can talk about other codes as well like movement
explain sentence study with hammer
-When people understand a sentence, they actually come up with a perceptual representation of that sentence.
-Concepts are represented in brain areas similar to those that process perceptions.
Ex. Describe someone hammering a nail, in one condition people heard about hammering a nail into a wall; in the other condition, people heard about a person hammering a nail into the floor
Asked people to identify what they were looking at, when people heard about people hammering into a wall they were quicker to identify the nail being hammered into the wall than they did being hammered into the floor, and vice versa
-Evidence for storing some perceptual thing,