Chapter 3: attention Flashcards

1
Q

what factors determine where we direct our attention

A

1) GOAL-DIRECTED FACTORS (ENDOGENOUS)
-Intentional

2) STIMULUS-DRIVEN FACTORS (EXOGENOUS)
-Incidental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

explain serial bottleneck

A

A point in the path from perception to action at which people cannot process all the information in parallel
-Think about all the info you encounter at any given time. It’s too much for you attentional resources all at once.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

when do bottle necks occur

A

EARLY-SELECTION THEORIES
-Filter occurs before we perceive the stimulus.

LATE-SELECTION THEORIES
-Filter occurs after we perceive the stimulus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

explain the dichotic listening task

A

-Subjects are presented with two messages to two ears over headphones and are instructed to “shadow” one
-SHADOWING: repeating back the words from one message only.
-Very little about the unattended message is processed in a shadowing task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

explain the filter theory

A

-Early selection theory
-Sensory information has to pass through some bottleneck, at which point only some of the information is selected for further processing.
-Selection of the message to which to attend is based on physical characteristics (e.g., pitch of voice).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what else can drive attention

A

semantic content (meaning of language)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

explain cocktail party effect

A

When you are at a party where a lot of sound is going on, you attend to your name being said

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

explain the Gray and Wedderburn study with two lists

A

Two lists are presented simultaneously:
 Dogs eight
 Six scratch
 Fleas two

Participants instructed to shadow meaningful message
-“dogs scratch fleas”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the two theories for auditory attention

A

1) THE ATTENUATION THEORY (Treisman, 1960)
-Early selection theory
-Certain messages would be weakened but not filtered out entirely on the basis of their physical properties
-Messages are minimized but not eliminated

2) LATE-SELECTION THEORY (Deutsch and Deutsch, 1963)
-The filter occurs after the perceptual stimulus has undergone analysis for verbal content
-No attenuation
-Limitations are in response system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

which theory for auditory attention is better

A

Probably attenuation theory
-Treisman and Geffen (1967)
-Shadow one message while listening to both for target word
-Tap when word is heard in either stream
-87% of target words in shadowed ear detected
-8% of target words in unshadowed ear detected
-If late selection is correct, they should have done equally well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

explain the Neisser and Becklen visual attention study

A

Performed visual analog of the shadowing task:
-Participants watched two videotapes superimposed over each other.
-Could find critical events… (ex. Being told to pay attention to the times people shook hands with one another)
-When told to monitor one film
-Not when told to monitor both
-Indicates they could successfully filter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain the O’Craven study with the houses and faces layered on top of each other

A

-When face is attended, there is activation in the fusiform face area
-When house is attended, there is activation in the parahippocampal place area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain the neural basis of visual attention

A

-Similar to auditory processing
-Provided evidence that there is enhanced neural processing in the portion of the visual cortex corresponding to the location of visual attention (much like the ear)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explain the visual search task with letters and search time

A

Neisser (1964)
-Participants scanned a matrix of letters searching for a target letter.
-Search time was a function of how far down the target letter was in the matrix.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain the pop out effect

A

TREISMAN AND GELADE (1980)
-Distinctive targets are easier to find (pop out at you) than when they blend with the context.
-People are much more affected by the number of objects to scan when target is not distinctive
-Ex. Finding a T is harder in a field of Zs than in Ys

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the binding problem

A

-Different neurons respond to different individual features – a vertical red line is both vertical and red. Furthermore, what if there is a red vertical bar and a green horizontal bar?
-If different neurons respond to each feature, how do we “bind” them together to make a coherent perception?

17
Q

solution to the binding problem

A

TREISMAN AND GELADE: FEATURE-INTEGRATION THEORY
-First, people perceive features from visual field (color, movement, etc.)
-Next, use attention to synthesize those features located in the same place into an object
-Attention is important here

18
Q

explain illusory conjunctions in the realm of the study with numbers and different colored letters

A

TREISMAN AND SCHMIDT (1982)
-People report digits from one part of their visual field
-(they pay attention to this)
-colored letters are shown in another part
-(they’re not paying attention to this)
-People report color/letter combinations of features that did not occur
-Can combine features accurately only when attention is focused

19
Q

what are the three studies on neural mechanisms involving binding of a single object together

A

1) LUCK AND COLLEAGUES (1997)
-Found neurons specific to particular object types fire only when attending to that object (even if other objects are there)

2) KASTNER AND COLLEAGUES (1998)
-Demonstrated enhanced neural processing in visual area of attended objects (not unattended objects)

3) SIMONS AND CHABRIS (1999)
-video of people and basketball with gorilla
-Demonstrated effects of sustained attention

20
Q

what brain areas are involved in controlling attention

A

Posterior parietal lobe

21
Q

explain unilateral vision neglect

A

POSNER AND COLLEAGUES (1982)
-Patients ignore information in the visual field on the opposite side as the brain damage.

22
Q

study with unilateral vision neglect

A

Someone with brain damage on the one side was unable to cross out circles on the left side of an array

23
Q

explain the study with brain damage on either side of the brain and drawing

A

-The right parietal region is responsible for attention to such global features as spatial location, whereas the left parietal region is responsible for directing attention to local aspects of objects.
-Showed people pictures and asked people to reproduce the pictures
-Those with right brain damage got the detail right but not the overall shape, those with left brain damage got the shape right but not the detail

24
Q

explain object based attention

A

-Where people focus their attention on objects rather than on regions in space
-May be easier

25
Q

explain central attention: selecting lines of thought to pursue

A

Executive control

People are often able to pursue only one line of thought at a time.

Two laboratory tasks:
-No ability to overlap two tasks
-Almost total ability to overlap tasks

26
Q

explain the Byrne and Anderson study about solving math problems

A

-Selecting lines of thought to pursue
-Participants were not able to overlap two math computations at the same time.
-Participants were given three numbers and had to verify that they were an addition math equation and multiply the first and last number by each other as well
-Hit a bottleneck trying to do two math problems at the same time

27
Q

explain the schumacher et al study about time sharing

A

-Selecting lines of thought to pursue
- PERFECT TIME-SHARING
-The ability to pursue more than one task at the same time
-Hearing different tones, when they heard the tone had to say high, medium or low and encoding different letter locations

CENTRAL BOTTLENECK
-The inability of central cognition to pursue multiple lines of thought simultaneously
-Can occur for any stream of processing
-(also, some practice – task became automatic)

They did not have any bottlenecks with the timing of each task so they were able to do them at the same time or by themselves at the same speed
-You cannot think about two things at the same time, but you can think about a thing while you are doing something else

28
Q

what is automaticity

A

Expertise through practice
-Performance of a skill that has been practiced repeatedly that eventually is executed with little or no direct attention
-What are some things that you do automatically?
-Usually this is a good thing, but sometimes maybe not

29
Q

explain the stroop effect

A

Reading becomes automatic

Participants say the ink color in which words are printed
-The words spell names of colors that are not congruent with the ink color.

30
Q

what prefrontal sites are important for executive control

A

Direction of central cognition (executive control)

Prefrontal regions important in executive control
-Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
-Anterior cingulate cortex