Chapter 3: attention Flashcards
what factors determine where we direct our attention
1) GOAL-DIRECTED FACTORS (ENDOGENOUS)
-Intentional
2) STIMULUS-DRIVEN FACTORS (EXOGENOUS)
-Incidental
explain serial bottleneck
A point in the path from perception to action at which people cannot process all the information in parallel
-Think about all the info you encounter at any given time. It’s too much for you attentional resources all at once.
when do bottle necks occur
EARLY-SELECTION THEORIES
-Filter occurs before we perceive the stimulus.
LATE-SELECTION THEORIES
-Filter occurs after we perceive the stimulus.
explain the dichotic listening task
-Subjects are presented with two messages to two ears over headphones and are instructed to “shadow” one
-SHADOWING: repeating back the words from one message only.
-Very little about the unattended message is processed in a shadowing task.
explain the filter theory
-Early selection theory
-Sensory information has to pass through some bottleneck, at which point only some of the information is selected for further processing.
-Selection of the message to which to attend is based on physical characteristics (e.g., pitch of voice).
what else can drive attention
semantic content (meaning of language)
explain cocktail party effect
When you are at a party where a lot of sound is going on, you attend to your name being said
explain the Gray and Wedderburn study with two lists
Two lists are presented simultaneously:
Dogs eight
Six scratch
Fleas two
Participants instructed to shadow meaningful message
-“dogs scratch fleas”
what are the two theories for auditory attention
1) THE ATTENUATION THEORY (Treisman, 1960)
-Early selection theory
-Certain messages would be weakened but not filtered out entirely on the basis of their physical properties
-Messages are minimized but not eliminated
2) LATE-SELECTION THEORY (Deutsch and Deutsch, 1963)
-The filter occurs after the perceptual stimulus has undergone analysis for verbal content
-No attenuation
-Limitations are in response system
which theory for auditory attention is better
Probably attenuation theory
-Treisman and Geffen (1967)
-Shadow one message while listening to both for target word
-Tap when word is heard in either stream
-87% of target words in shadowed ear detected
-8% of target words in unshadowed ear detected
-If late selection is correct, they should have done equally well
explain the Neisser and Becklen visual attention study
Performed visual analog of the shadowing task:
-Participants watched two videotapes superimposed over each other.
-Could find critical events… (ex. Being told to pay attention to the times people shook hands with one another)
-When told to monitor one film
-Not when told to monitor both
-Indicates they could successfully filter
explain the O’Craven study with the houses and faces layered on top of each other
-When face is attended, there is activation in the fusiform face area
-When house is attended, there is activation in the parahippocampal place area
explain the neural basis of visual attention
-Similar to auditory processing
-Provided evidence that there is enhanced neural processing in the portion of the visual cortex corresponding to the location of visual attention (much like the ear)
explain the visual search task with letters and search time
Neisser (1964)
-Participants scanned a matrix of letters searching for a target letter.
-Search time was a function of how far down the target letter was in the matrix.
explain the pop out effect
TREISMAN AND GELADE (1980)
-Distinctive targets are easier to find (pop out at you) than when they blend with the context.
-People are much more affected by the number of objects to scan when target is not distinctive
-Ex. Finding a T is harder in a field of Zs than in Ys